In this communication, we present theoretical and experi-
mental evidence showing that the absolute configuration of
1,2-amino alcohols with secondary/primary and primary/
secondarystructures,6 (type 1 and 2 respectively, Figure 1)
Figure 1. Structures of (R)-MPA, sec/prim-, and prim/sec-1,2-amino
alcohols (1 and 2, respectively).
can be determined by comparison of the 1H NMR chemical
shifts of the auxiliary OMe or CRH groups at the corre-
sponding bis-(R) and bis-(S)-MPA derivatives, easily pre-
pared in a one-pot reaction.7
This constitutes the first case where the assignment of
configurations by NMR can be carried out by examination
of the auxiliary signals instead of those of the substrate due
to the cross anisotropic interactions between auxiliaries. An
additional merit is that the diagnostic signals are easily
identified singlets instead of the more complex signals due
to L1/L2 substituents.
Bis-(R) and bis-(S)-MPA derivatives of (S)-2-amino-
propan-1-ol (3) were selected as model compounds to
perform the conformational analysis8 of sec/prim-1,2-
amino alcohols with general structure 1 (Figure 1). Figure
2a shows the main processes and conformers (sp, ap) as
obtained from theoretical calculations9 (AM1, B3LYP),
dynamic and low-temperature NMR, selective deuteration,
and CD studies. Figure 2b-c shows the NMR significant
conformers10 and shielding effects for the bis-(R) and bis-
(S)-MPA derivatives of (S)-2-aminopropan-1-ol (3). These
Figure 2. (a) Generation of bis-MPA main conformers. Expected
shielding effect for bis-(R) and (S)-MPA derivatives of (S)-2-
aminopropan-1-ol (3) (b and c, respectively) and (S)-1-aminopropan-
2-ol (11) (d and e, respectively).
structures have a characteristic not present in any of the
polyfunctional substrates studied so far and that makes
this case special: in the bis-(R)-MPA derivative, the MPA
amide group shields the MPA ester moiety, whereas in
the bis-(S)-MPA derivative, the role between the two MPA
units is reversed and now the MPA amide unit is shielded
by the MPA ester.
A parallel situation takes place in the bis-MPA derivatives
of a prim/sec-1,2-amino alcohol with general structure 211
[i.e., (S)-1-aminopropan-2-ol (11), Figures 2d-e].
(6) The terms secondary/primary and primary/secondary refer only to
the carbons to which the amino/hydroxy groups are linked.
(7) The bis-MPA derivatives of amino alcohols 3-18 were prepared
(always introducing the two units of the auxiliary in a single reaction) by
treatment of the amino alcohol (1.0 equiv) with the corresponding (R) and
(S)-R-methoxy-R-phenylacetic acid (MPA; 2.2 equiv) in the presence of
1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, 2.2
equiv) and DMAP (cat) in dry CH2Cl2, under a nitrogen atmosphere. The
reactions were stirred at rt for 3-8 h, followed by the usual purification
and isolation steps.
These results mean that in the bis-derivatives of 1,2-amino
alcohols of type 1 and 2, one of the MPA units is always
acting as “active reagent” and projecting its aromatic
shielding effect on the other MPA unit that therefore can be
considered as a “substrate”.
This “reagent-substrate” role of the two MPA units
exchanges both with the stereochemistries of the auxiliary
(the MPA unit acting as “reagent” in the bis-(R) is trans-
formed into the “substrate” in the bis-(S)-derivative of the
same amino alcohol) and with those of the amino alcohol
(for the same derivative, i.e., bis-(R)-MPA, the role of each
MPA unit is reversed with the absolute configuration of the
amino alcohol: the MPA unit acting as “reagent” in the (R)-
amino alcohol acts as “substrate” in the (S)-amino alcohol,
Figure 2). As a consequence, the chemical shifts of the
(8) See Supporting Information for conformational energy distribution
and a detailed conformer description.
(9) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.;
Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.;
Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski,
J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.;
Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz,
J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.;
Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.7; Gaussian, Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(10) Only conformers generated by rotation around ω1 and ω2 bonds
[CR-CO, MPA] are of interest from the NMR point of view. They explain
the shielding effects and chemical shift differences experienced by CRH
and OMe MPA signals.
(11) The same conformational analysis (rotation around ω1-4 bonds,
AM1, B3LYP calculations, NMR and CD) performed on the bis-(R) and
(S)-MPA derivatives of (S)-1-aminopropan-2-ol leads to the same results.
See Supporting Information for detailed information.
2730
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 13, 2008