T. Ohishi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 7067–7070
7069
C8H17
O
C8H17
O
OOB
O
N
H
C
O
N
TFA = CF3COOH
N
C
N
C
O
OOB
O
O
H
O
C
TFA
TIPS
C8H17
C8H17
TIPS =
HSi
reflux, 20 h
N
C
N C
O
O
H
OOB O
O
C8H17
C8H17
cycle1b' (32%)
cycle1b
Scheme 2. Deprotection of cycle1b.
as a model compound of the polyamide, was more stable than a
curved structure (ca. 2.1 kcal/mol). This implies that poly1 would
preferentially adopt a planar zigzag conformation rather than a
curved conformation, and the former conformation is likely to have
stronger intermolecular interaction among polymer chains.
Since the cyclic triamide was obtained as byproduct in the poly-
merization of 1, we next tried to selectively synthesize the cyclic
triamide of 1b. Contrary to the case of cyclic trimerization of N-
alkylated p-aminobenzoic acid esters,9 when LiHMDS was added
to a solution of 1b,10 the GPC profile of the product obtained after
4 h showed a sharp peak due to cyclic triamide (Fig. 2). Purification
on a silica gel column afforded the cyclic triamide of 1b in a 70%
yield.
Deprotection of the cyclic triamide was attempted with TFA, but
the OOB group was not removed. Then, the cyclic triamide was re-
fluxed in neat TFA with triisopropylsilane (TIPS) as a scavenger, as
reported by Wilson et al. (Scheme 2).11 In the 1H NMR spectrum of
the product, the signal of the benzylic protons of the OOB group at
around 4.90 ppm had disappeared, and a new signal due to amide
N–H proton was observed at around 7.27 ppm (Fig. 3). The MALDI-
TOF mass spectrum contained only one peak corresponding to the
Na+ adduct of N–H cyclic triamide (cycle1b0).
h
g
f
h
e
c
O
b
N
C
O
a
H
3
d
e
g
d
a
c
f
b
ppm
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
Figure 3. H NMR spectrum (600 MHz, CDCl3) of cycle1b0.
alkoxy group did not afford cyclic triamides.7 The difference may
be accounted for by the lower acidity of the amino group of 1
due to intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the amine pro-
ton and the alkoxy oxygen; slow proton abstraction of the amino
group would induce the reaction of deprotonated 1 with non-
deprotonated 1, leading to self-condensation. Actually, the amino
proton of 1 appears at higher magnetic field (4.64–4.57 ppm), com-
pared to that of meta-substitute monomers without the alkoxy
group (4.09–4.02 ppm).7b
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that well-defined poly(m-
benzamide)s having a specific conformation arising from intramo-
lecular hydrogen bonding between CONH and an alkoxy group can
be obtained by means of CGCP of 1 bearing alkoxy groups on the
benzene ring, followed by removal of the OOB group with TFA. Fur-
thermore, we found that the cyclic trimer of 1 was selectively
obtained by the slow addition of LiHMDS to a solution of 1; the ob-
tained cyclic tertiary triamide was converted to the secondary tria-
mide by the removal of the OOB group with TFA/TIPS.
Removal of the OOB group on the amide nitrogen of the
obtained poly1b and poly1c was conducted with trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) in CH2Cl2 at ambient temperature for 3 days.7b,8 The
reaction proceeded homogeneously, and the products were puri-
fied by precipitation into a large amount of hexane. In the 1H
NMR spectra of the products, the signal of the benzylic protons
of the OOB group at around 4.90 ppm was absent. The FT-IR spectra
of the products showed N–H stretching bands at 3290 cmꢁ1. There-
fore, the OOB group was quantitatively removed, resulting in the
desired secondary polyamides. However, both the N–H polybenza-
mides were only soluble in TFA and CH2Cl2 and had lower
solubility than poly(N-H-m-benzamide), which is soluble in
dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc).7b
This result is considered to be due to intramolecular hydrogen
bond formation between amide N–H and the oxygen atom at the
ortho position of the benzene ring in poly1, which favours the for-
mation of a sheet structure, such as a planar zigzag or a curved
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Scientific Frontier Research Project
Grant from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sport and Culture,
Japan.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. For example (review), see: (a) Gong, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4336–4342; (b)
Huc, I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 17–29; (c) Huc, I.; Cuccia, L. In Foldamers:
Structure, Properties, and Applications; Hecht, S., Huc, I., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2007; (d) Zhao, X.; Li, Z.-T. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1601–1616.
2. (a) Yokozawa, T.; Yokoyama, A. Polym. J. 2004, 36, 65–83; (b) Yokozawa, T.;
Yokoyama, A. Chem. Rec. 2005, 5, 47–57; (c) Yokoyama, A.; Yokozawa, T.
Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4093–4101; (d) Yokozawa, T.; Yokoyama, A. Prog.
Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 147–172; (e) Yokozawa, T.; Yokoyama, A. Chem. Rev. 2009,
109, 5595–5619.
structure (Fig. S2), resulting in strong
p–p interaction between
polymer chains. Furthermore, density functional theory (DFT) cal-
culations at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level showed that a zigzag struc-
ture of 3-(N-benzoylamino)-4-methoxybenz-20-methoxyanilide,