tion of 7-methoxycoumarin,13 or regioselective allylation,14
have been reported in the literature. However, these methods
cannot be used to produce optically active molecules and
we have not found any reports of attempts to prepare these
quinones in an enantiomeric form, probably because of the
difficult access to such an asymmetric center. We therefore
turned our attention to a new synthetic access to these
molecules permitting the introduction of an induction step.
In the past few years, methods for the asymmetric
hydrogenation of double bonds, using optically active
complexes of transition metals, have been extensively
developed.15 This approach has been successfully applied
to the preparation of optically active amino acids, via the
reduction of acrylic acid derivatives,15 and to the asymmetric
reduction of allylic alcohols,16 catalyzed by chiral rhodium
or ruthenium complexes.
Despite the presence of two rather similar aromatic
functions on the allylic alcohol 2, the large enantiomeric
excess obtained opens the way to the synthesis of dalber-
gione-type molecules. We now report the stereoselective
synthesis of (R)- and (S)-4-methoxyalbergione, thus provid-
ing a new access to this family of optically active quinones.
7-Methoxy-4-phenylcoumarin (5)18 was prepared from 2-hy-
droxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (4) and ((ethoxycarbonyl)-
methylene)triphenylphosphorane by a Wittig-type reaction
in refluxing toluene with a 78% yield (Scheme 2). The
Scheme 2a
We have previously investigated whether such an approach
could give access to optically active quinones of the
dalbergione type and found that intermediates 3a and 3b
could be prepared from the allylic alcohol 2 with an
enantiomeric excess of up to 95%, via an asymmetric
hydrogenation step (Scheme 1).17 The enantiomeric excess
a Reagents, conditions, and yields: (a) Ph3PdCHCO2Et, toluene,
reflux, 10 days, 78%; (b) LiAlH4, THF/Et2O, 0 °C, 97%; (c) MeI,
K2CO3, acetone, 100%.
Scheme 1a
coumarin 5 was then reduced at 0 °C using LiAlH4 in a 1/1
mixture of ether and THF to give, in 97% yield, the allylic
alcohol 6.19 Note that the same reaction carried out in THF
alone gave an unseparable mixture of allylic and saturated
alcohols. Subsequent treatment of 6 with MeI and K2CO3 in
refluxing acetone gave the key intermediate 2.
The induction step was carried out on a 2 mmol scale,
using either [Rh((R,R)-bdpp)(NBD)]ClO4 or [Rh((S,S)-bdpp)-
(NBD)]ClO4 as catalyst (substrate/catalyst 10/1) at an
hydrogen pressure of 80 bar with a reaction time of 7 days.
Thus, hydrogenation of 2 provided selective access to both
enantiomers 3a and 3b with enantiomeric excess up to 95%.20
a Reagents: (a) H2, MeOH, [Rh((S,S)-bdpp)(NBD)]ClO4; (b) H2,
MeOH, [Rh((R,R)-bdpp)(NBD)]ClO4.
1
was determined by H NMR using tris[3-(trifluoromethyl-
hydroxymethylene)-(+)-camphorato]europium(III), but at
that time the absolute configuration could not be determined.
(14) Mukerjee, S. K.; Saraja, T.; Seshadri, T. R. Indian J. Chem. 1970,
8, 21.
(15) For review articles see: (a) Valentine, D.; Scott, J. W. Synthesis
1978, 329. (b) Caplar, V.; Comisso, G.; Sunjic, V. Synthesis 1981, 85. (c)
Noyori, R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1989, 18, 187. (d) Brown, J. M. Chem. Soc.
ReV. 1993, 22, 25.
(5) (a) Hausen, B. Woods Injurious to Human Health; de Gruyter: Berlin.
1981. (b) Woods, B.; Calnan, C. D. Br. J. Dermatol. 1976, 94, 1 (Suppl.
13).
(6) (a) Benezra, C.; Ducombs, G.; Sell, Y.; Foussereau, J. Plant Contact
Dermatitis; Decker: Toronto, Philadelphia, 1985. (b) Lepoittevin, J.-P.;
Benezra, C. Pharm. Weekbl., Sci. Ed. 1991, 13, 119.
(7) Eyton, W. B.; Ollis, W. D.; Sutherland, I. O.; Jackman, L. M.;
Gottlieb, O. R.; Magalhaes, M. T. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1962, 301.
(8) (a) Eyton, W. B.; Ollis, W. D.; Sutherland, I. O.; Gottlieb, O. R.;
Magalhaes, M. T.; Jackman, L. M. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 2683. (b) Eyton,
W. B.; Ollis, W. D.; Fineberg, M.; Gottlieb, O. R.; Salignac de Souza
Guimaraes, I.; Magalhaes, M. T. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 2697.
(9) (a) Donnely, B. J.; Donnely, D. M. X.; O’Sullivan, A. M.; Prender-
gast, J. P. Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 4409. (b) Donnely, D. M. X.; O’Reilly,
J. Phytochemistry 1975, 14, 2287.
(10) Donnelly, B. J.; Donnely, D. M. X.; Sharkey, C. B. Phytochemistry
1965, 4, 337.
(11) Barnes, M. F.; Ollis, W. D.; Sutherland, I. O.; Gottlieb, O. R.;
Magalhaes, M. T. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 2707.
(12) Mageswaran, S.; Ollis, W. D.; Roberts, R. J.; Sutherland, I. O.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 34, 2897.
(13) Narata, Y.; Uno, H.; Maryjama, K. Nippon Kagaku Kaishi 1981,
831.
(16) Takaya, H.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1596.
(17) Bissel, P.; Sablong, R.; Lepoittevin, J.-P. Tetrahedron Asym. 1995,
6, 835.
(18) 7-Methoxy-4-phenylcoumarin (5): white crystals, mp 105-106 °C;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 3.86 (s, 3H), 6.15 (s, 1H), 6.40 (dd, 1H, J
) 9.0 Hz, J ) 2.4 Hz), 6.50 (d, 1H, J ) 2.4 Hz), 7.45-7.86 (m, 6H). 13
C
NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz) δ 55.7, 101.1, 111.7, 112.2, 112.4, 128.3, 128.7,
129.5, 135.5, 155.7, 155.9, 161.0, 161.1, 182.7. Anal. Calcd for C16H12O3:
C, 76.18; H, 4.80. Found: C, 75.94; H, 4.71.
(19) 3-(2′-Hydroxy-4′-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenyl-2-propenol (6): white
crystals, mp 136-137 °C; 1H NMR ((CD3)2CO, 200 MHz) δ 2.85 (bt, 1H,
J ) 6.5 Hz), 3.78 (s, 3H), 4.07 (dd, tlike, J ) 6.6 Hz), 6.33 (t, J ) 6.6 Hz),
6.46-6.53 (m, 2H), 6.88 (d, 1H, J ) 8.2 Hz), 7.20-7.29 (m, 5H), 7.92 (s,
1H); 13C NMR ((CD3)2CO, 50 MHz) δ 55.5, 61.0, 102.5, 106.2, 119.4,
127.5, 127.8, 128.9, 130.9, 132.6, 139.0, 142.8, 156.5, 161.4. Anal. Calcd
for C16H16O3: C, 74.98; H, 6.29. Found: C, 74.59; H, 6.39.
(20) The enantiomeric excess was determined using 1H NMR by adding
0.4 equiv of tris[3-(trifluoromethylhydroxymethylene)-(+)-camphorato]-
europium(III) to 5 mg of 3a or 3b in CDCl3 (0.5 mL). 3a: ee ) 95%, [R]D
) +49° (c ) 0.82, CHCl3). 3b: ee ) 94%, [R]D ) -49° (c ) 0.82, CHCl3).
1284
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 8, 1999