Organic Letters
Letter
extended its relevance due to its low toxicity, cost-effectiveness,
and no requirement for noncommercial ligands in chemical
reactions.15 In continuation of our ongoing research on base-
promoted reactions16 and hydroamination chemistry,17 we
anticipated that the direct hydroamidation of alkene could
occur via KOH-DMSO assisted nucleophilic addition (Scheme
1c).
To explore the base-assisted nucleophilic addition we began
with the examination of a several bases and solvent reported in
the literature using benzamide 1a and styrene 2a as a model
substrate (Table 1). Inspired by our previous conditions,17 we
reactants and product 3a is negligible (0.028 kcal/mol); i.e.,
the reactant and product exist in equilibrium. Alternatively, the
product 3a′ (Markovnikov’s) formation is an endergonic
process by 4.18 kcal/mol and hence is not a preferred path (as
supported by experimental observation).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we
extended the scope of the developed protocol with various
arylalkyl alkenes (Scheme 2). The reaction of benzamide 1a
a b
,
Scheme 2. Scope of Vinyl Arenes
a
Table 1. Optimization Table
b
entry
base
solvent
time (h) temp (°C) yield (%) 3a
117
2
3
4
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
K2CO3
K3PO4
Et3N
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
EtOH
EG
NMP
THF
toluene
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
0.5
6
12
120
120
120
120
80
120
70
120
120
60
c
30
48
80
30
c
trace
55
61
c
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
5
6
d
a
b
Optimized conditions (entry 4, Table 1). Isolated yield.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
with styrene 2a, electron-releasing alkenes 2b (4-Me), and 2c
(4-OMe) furnished the products 3a−c in 70−80% yields.
Notably, the halogen-substituted styrene 2d effectively gave
the corresponding hydroamidated product 3d in 75% yield. It
is worth noting that reaction of 1a with a bulky and sterically
hindered alkene such as diphenyl(4-vinylphenyl)phosphine 2e
and (4-methylpent-1-ene-2,4-diyl) dibenzene 2f provided the
desired products 3e and 3f in 71 and 60% yield, respectively.
However, the 4-nitrostyrene 2g, aliphatic alkene 2h, and
acrylate 2i were incapable of producing the hydroamidated
product (Scheme 2).
100
120
120
120
c
40
50
c
a
Reactions were carried out using 0.5 mmol of 1a, 2a (0.8 mmol), and
b
c
base (0.5 equiv) in 2.0 mL of solvent. Isolated yield. No reaction.
d
Base (0.2 equiv). 3a′ product was not obtained. EG = ethylene
glycol, NMP = N-methylpyrrolidone, THF = tetrahydrofuran.
Encouraged by the above results, the reaction of alkene 2
with electronically bias ring/substituents on the amide partner
was performed (Scheme 3). The reaction of amide 1b bearing
an electron-releasing methyl group provided the desired
hydroamidated products 4a−f in 60−79% yields. The reaction
of 4-methoxybenzamide 1c with styrene 2a was fruitful in
providing the product 4g in 78% yield. It was interesting to
note that the 4-hydroxybenzamide 1d selectively gave the
hydroamidated product 4h in 65% yield. However, strong
electron-withdrawing nitro-substituted benzamide 1e did not
undergo the addition reaction smoothly. The addition of 3-
(trifluoromethyl) benzamide 1f on to alkene 2a furnished the
product 4j in 81% yield. The halogen and electron-with-
drawing group containing alkenes 2j (4-Cl) and 2k (4-CF3)
were successful in delivering the nucleophilic addition product
4k−l in good yield. When benzamide 1g containing a bromo
substituent at the ortho position of aryl ring was used for the
reaction, the desired addition products 4m−o were obtained in
69−78% yields. In contrast to o-bromobenzamide, the para-
substituent 1h gave 4-bromo-N-phenethylbenzamide 4p in
80% yield. A sluggish reaction of 4-fluoro-3-formylbenzamide
1i with 2a was observed (Scheme 3).
carried out the reaction of 1a with alkene 2a using KOH in
DMSO at 120 °C for 0.5 h, but the conversion did not initiate
(entry 1). The promotional effect of time elevates the yield of
the product 3a (entries 2−4). On lowering the reaction
temperature, a 30% yield of the hydroamidated product was
observed (entry 5). When 0.2 equiv of KOH was loaded in the
system, the nucleophilic addition reaction did not occur (entry
6). Exchanging the solvents EtOH, ethylene glycol, NMP,
THF, and toluene with KOH proved to be inferior for the
reaction (entries 7−11). Different bases such as K2CO3, and
K3PO4 were studied, and it was found that the nature of bases,
as well as their counterions, influenced the reactivity of the
hydroamidation reaction and provided compound 3a in
moderate yields (entries 12 and 13), while no product was
observed with Et3N (entry 14).
To understand the possible reason for the selective
formation of anti-Markovnikov product, quantum chemical
calculations were accomplished using the B3LYP/6-311+G(d)
method. Complete optimization of the 3D structures of 1a, 2a,
3a, and 3a′ (Table 1) were performed using the Berny
optimization procedure. The enthalpy of the reactions was
carried out by estimating the relative energies. The formation
of 3a (anti-Markovnikov product) is a thermodynamically
favorable process because the energy difference between the
Subsequently, we explored the chemoselectivity of the
reaction using aminobenzamides (Scheme 4). To study the
chemoselective hydroamidation, we carried out reaction
566
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 565−570