Barbier Allylation in Aqueous Media
species.8 It is known that the Barbier allylation in aprotic
solvents proceeds through a direct nucleophilic addition reaction
with zinc and tin,10 while allylmagnesium bromide reacts by a
single electron-transfer process.11 A recent computational study
has shown that allylzinc, -indium, -tin, -antimony, and -bismuth
species are more reactive toward the allylation of carbonyl
compounds than toward hydrolysis, while allylmagnesium
bromide shows a similar reactivity in the two reactions.12
Secondary deuterium kinetic isotope effect studies on the
allylation of benzaldehyde in aqueous media have indicated that
the reaction with zinc, indium, and tin proceeds through a rate-
determining polar addition with the allylmetal species, while
the allylation with magnesium and antimony follows a single
electron-transfer pathway on the metal surface in the magnesium
case and between the allylmetal and the aldehyde in the
antimony case.13 Further experimental evidence comes from
NMR studies that have shown that indium, tin, and antimony
react with allylbromide in water to form allylmetal intermedi-
ates.14 However, for the different metals, there are still a number
of unanswered questions with regard to the nature of the
allylmetal species and the involvement of single electron-transfer
processes. Therefore, we decided to perform a more systematic
study of the mechanism for the Barbier allylation in aqueous
media in the presence of various metals. Herein, we describe a
combined experimental and theoretical study with six metals
where we employed Hammett studies and isotopic labeling
experiments in combination with high-level computational
modeling.
SCHEME 1. General Scheme for Competitive Allylation of
Benzaldehydes
TABLE 1. Yields for Allylations in Scheme 1
yielda (%)
entry
X
Znb
Inc
Snc
Sbd
Bic
Mge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-CN
99 (94f) 90
94
93
98
-COOMe 98 (93f) 87 (99g) 82 (85g) 95
83 (88g) 25 (26g)
-CF3
-Cl
-H
-Me
-tBu
-OMe
-OBu
99 (91f) 98
96 (90f) 75 (80g) 95
96 (92f) 92
94
99
66 (90g) 94
60 (65g)
87 (92g) 84 (92g) 60 (62g)
69
88
49f
99 (95f) 75 (81g) 82 (93g) 50 (83g) 71 (84g) 14 (79g)
99 (92f) 56 (81g)
76 (82f)
63 (82g)
37 (72g)
18 (41g)
83 (90f)
a Yields determined by GC. b Performed in 1:1 THF/saturated aqueous
NH4Cl with acid-washed zinc. c Performed in 1:1 THF/H2O. d Performed
in 7:3 THF/0.5 M HCl with antimony metal prepared from reduction of
SbCl3 with NaBH4. e Performed with allyliodide in 4:1 DMF/0.1 M NH4Cl.
f Isolated yield. g Yield based on converted aldehyde.
with allylbromide (Scheme 1). Zinc, indium, tin, antimony,
bismuth, and magnesium were selected as the metals since they
display vastly different reactivities in aqueous media and may
react by different mechanisms.
First, reaction conditions had to be established for each of
the six metals. In most cases, THF was used as a cosolvent to
dissolve the para-substituted benzaldehydes. With zinc, the
highest yield of the homoallylic alcohols was obtained in a 1:1
mixture of THF and aqueous ammonium chloride (Table 1).8c
This mixture formed a two-phase system consisting of an
aqueous THF phase and a saturated ammonium chloride phase.
It was shown by GC that the aldehydes and the allylbromide
were present in the THF phase, while no compounds could be
detected in the ammonium chloride phase. The yields of the
homoallylic alcohols were lower when the reactions were
performed in a THF/water mixture, and this did not change by
using ultrasound. On the other hand, with indium, tin, and
bismuth, the THF/water mixture proved to give the best results.
All three metals reacted significantly more slowly than zinc,
and it was necessary to heat the reactions with tin and bismuth
to 60 °C. Antimony and magnesium resulted in a slower reaction
than all the other metals. With antimony, it was necessary to
use a solvent system of THF and 0.5 M hydrochloric acid.14c
Furthermore, antimony had to be prepared from antimony(III)
chloride and sodium borohydride16 to give a good conversion,
while commercially available antimony powder reacted more
sluggishly. It has been reported previously that antimony and
bismuth can be activated by potassium fluoride for the allylation
of aldehydes,8h,17 but in our hands, this procedure did not provide
a more reactive metal. Magnesium proved to be even more
troublesome, and we were unable to reproduce the original
conditions with allyliodide in either a THF/water mixture or in
a 0.1 M ammonium chloride solution.8g In our hands, these
reactions did not go to completion and mainly led to pinacol
Results and Discussion
Hammett Studies. We recently used a combination of
Hammett correlations and computational studies to investigate
the mechanism for the addition of functionalized organozinc
reagents to a series of para-substituted benzaldimines and found
that the rate-determining step most likely did not involve free
radicals.15 Prompted by this study, we chose to investigate the
Barbier reaction by allylating para-substituted benzaldehydes
(8) (a) Killinger, T. A.; Boughton, N. A.; Runge, T. A.; Wolinsky, J. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1977, 124, 131-134 (Zn). (b) Nokami, J.; Otera, J.;
Sudo, T.; Okawara, R. Organometallics 1983, 2, 191-193 (Sn). (c) Pe´trier,
C.; Luche, J.-L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 910-912 (Zn). (d) Li, C. J.; Chan,
T. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7017-7020 (In). (e) Wada, M.; Ohki,
H.; Akiba, K.-y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 1738-1747 (Bi). (f) Li,
C.-J.; Meng, Y.; Yi, X.-H.; Ma, J.; Chan, T.-H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
7498-7504 (Mn). (g) Zhang, W.-C.; Li, C.-J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
3230-3236 (Mg). (h) Li, L.-H.; Chan, T. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
5009-5012 (Sb).
(9) We recently used both metals for allylation of carbohydrate aldehydes
in aqueous media, see: (a) Håkansson, A. E.; Palmelund, A.; Holm, H.;
Madsen, R. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 3243-3253. (b) Hansen, F. G.;
Bundgaard, E.; Madsen, R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10139-10142. (c)
Palmelund, A.; Madsen, R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8248-8251. (d)
Keinicke, L.; Madsen, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 4124-4128.
(10) (a) Yamataka, H.; Nishikawa, K.; Hanafusa, T. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1992, 65, 2145-2150. (b) Yamataka, H.; Nishikawa, K.; Hanafusa,
T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994, 67, 242-245.
(11) Gajewski, J. J.; Bocian, W.; Harris, N. J.; Olson, L. P.; Gajewski,
J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 326-334.
(12) Chung, L. W.; Chan, T. H.; Wu, Y.-D. Organometallics 2005, 24,
1598-1607.
(13) (a) Gajewski, J. J.; Bocian, W.; Brichford, N. L.; Henderson, J. L.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4236-4240. (b) Lucas, P.; Gajewski, J. J.; Chan,
T. H. Can. J. Anal. Sci. Spectrosc. 2003, 48, 1-6.
(14) (a) Chan, T. H.; Yang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3228-
3229. (b) Chan, T. H.; Yang, Y.; Li, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4452-
4455. (c) Li, L.-H.; Chan, T. H. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 1536-1540.
(15) Keinicke, L.; Fristrup, P.; Norrby, P.-O.; Madsen, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 15756-15761.
(16) Ren, P.-D.; Jin, Q.-H.; Yao, Z.-P. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 2761-
2767.
(17) Smith, K.; Lock, S.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Wada, M.; Miyoshi, N. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 935-938.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 73, No. 8, 2008 3229