ORDER
REPRINTS
❛
¨ ¨
ASTROM AND STROMBERG
1388
The thermal stability of the 2ꢀ-O-Me modified oligonucleotide 1 was deter-
mined by means of thermal melting of complex with complementary sequence 2.
In order to determine the effect of the catalytic group on the duplex-stability, the
melting temperature was checked both before and after conjugation with 7. The
melting point was determined to 44◦C and 39◦C respectively.
Kinetic cleavage studies have been initiated using the 5-aminoneocuproine-
1 nuclease to cleave complementary oligonucleotide substrate 2 and sequence 3
that contains an additional adenosine unit in the middle of the sequence. In both
cases cleavage was detected in presence of 10-mM Zn2+ ions at pH 7. In the case
of sequence 3 the cleavage appears to be more sequence selective. In the case of
5-aminoneocuproine-1 nuclease cleaving substrate 2 the estimated first order rate
constant is 2 × 10−4 min−1.
EXPERIMENTAL
Synthesis of the 5-aminoneocuproine-1 conjugate. Carbamate 7 (250 µg,
0.73 µmol) was dissolved in 14 µl dry DMSO. To this solution was added:
7 µl H2O, 75 µl Sodium tetraborate buffer (0.1-M, pH 8.5) and finally a 4 µl
(37 nmol) solution of oligonucleotide 1. The vial containing the reaction mixture
was agitated, 2 µl aliquotes were withdrawn from the reaction mixture, filtrated,
diluted to 100 µl water and analysed with reversed phase (RP) HPLC. The reaction
was incubated overnight although it appeared complete in 2 h. The reaction mixture
was then filtered and purified on RP HPLC. 18.3 nmol product corresponding to a
yield of 50% was isolated. Both analytical and preparative HPLC was performed
on a Hypersil ODS column (5 µm, 4.6 × 25 mm) using 5 min isocratic elution with
0.1-M triethylammonium acetate (aq.), then a linear gradient to the same buffer
containing 20% MeCN in 35 min and finally from 20 to 50% MeCN in 20 min.
Flow rate was 1 ml/min and temperature 50◦C.
REFERENCES
1. Trawick, B.N.; Daniher, A.T.; Bashkin, J.K. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 939–960.
2. Putnam, W.C.; Bashkin, J.K. Chem. Comm. 2000, 767–768.
3. Smith, G.F.; Cagle, F.W. JR. J. Org. Chem. 1947, 781–784.
4. Pojer, P.M.; Angyal, S.J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 3067–3068.
5. Veeneman, G.H.; Van der Marel, G.A.; Van der Elst, H.; Van Boom, J.H. Tetrahedron
1991, 47, 1547–1562.
6. (a) Garegg, P.J.; Lindh, I.; Regberg, T.; Stawinski, J.; Stro¨mberg, R.; Henrichson,
C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 4051–4054. (b) Garegg, P.J.; Lindh, I.; Regberg, T.;
Stawinski, J.; Stro¨mberg, R.; Henrichson, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 4055–4058.
(c) Froehler, B.C.; Matteucci, M.D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 469–472.
7. (a) Garegg, P.J.; Regberg, T.; Stawinski, J.; Stro¨mberg, R. Chemica. Scripta 1986, 26,
59–62. (b) Stawinski, J.; Stro¨mberg, R.; Thelin, M.; Westman, E. Nucleic Acids Res.
1988, 16, 9285–9298.