A. Cecchi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 3475–3480
3479
can be envisaged,3,21,22 considering also their potential as biore-
ductive drugs.
compound 1 in buffer (2 10-5 M)
compound 1 + hCA II (11:1 mol/mol)
A
In conclusion, we report here a novel series of spin-labeled sul-
fonamides incorporating TEMPO moieties which have been synthe-
sized by a procedure involving the formation of a thiourea
functionality between the benzenesulfonamide and free radical
fragment of the molecules. These new sulfonamides showed mod-
erate–weak inhibitory activity against isozyme hCA I, but were in
general much more efficient inhibitors of hCA II and hCA IX, the
last one being predominantly found in tumors. Some of these com-
pounds showed significant changes in their ESR signals when com-
plexed within the enzyme active site, making them potential
candidates of interest for the investigation of hypoxic tumors over-
expressing CA IX by ESR techniques for imaging and diagnostic
purposes.
Acknowledgments
3360
3380
3400
3420
Special thanks are addressed to Dr. Sally-Ann Poulsen (Griffith
University, Brisbane, Australia) for critically reading and correcting
our manuscript. This research was financed in part by a grant of the
6th Framework Programme of the European Union (EUROXY
project).
Magnetic Field, G
compound 6 in buffer (2 10-5 M)
compound 6 + hCA II (1:1 mol/mol)
B
References and notes
1. Alterio, V.; Vitale, R. M.; Monti, S. M.; Pedone, C.; Scozzafava, A.; Cecchi, A.; De
Simone, G.; Supuran, C. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8329.
2. (a) Cecchi, A.; Hulikova, A.; Pastorek, J.; Scozzafava, A.; Winum, J. Y.; Montero, J.
L.; Supuran, C. T. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4834; (b) Cecchi, A.; Supuran, C. T. Curr.
Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 699.
3. (a) Supuran, C. T. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2008, 7, 168; (b) Supuran, C. T.;
Scozzafava, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4336; (c) Thiry, A.; Dogné, J. M.;
Masereel, B.; Supuran, C. T. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27, 566.
4. (a) Svastova, E.; Hulikova, A.; Rafajova, M.; Zatovicova, M.; Gibadulinova, A.;
Casini, A.; Cecchi, A.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T.; Pastorek, J.; Pastorekova, S.
FEBS Lett. 2004, 577, 439; (b) Supuran, C. T. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 12,
283; (c) Pastorekova, S.; Kopacek, J.; Pastorek, J. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7,
865.
5. (a) Dubois, L.; Douma, K.; Supuran, C. T.; Chiu, R. K.; van Zandvoort, M. A. M. J.;
Pastoreková, S.; Scozzafava, A.; Wouters, B. G.; Lambin, P. Radiother. Oncol.
2007, 83, 367; (b) Pastoreková, S.; Zatovicova, M.; Pastorek, J. Curr. Pharm. Des.
2008, 14, 685.
3360
3380
3400
3420
Magnetic Field,G
6. (a) Taylor, J. S.; Mushak, P.; Coleman, J. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1970, 67,
1410; (b) Mushak, P.; Coleman, J. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 373; (c) Chignell, C.
F.; Starkweather, D. K.; Erlich, R. H. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 876; (d) Erlich, R. H.;
Starkweather, D. K.; Chignell, C. F. Mol. Pharmacol. 1972, 9, 61; (e) Hower, J. F.;
Henkens, R. W.; Chesnut, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 6665.
Figure 2. ESR spectra of compounds 1 (A), and 6 (B) in solution without enzyme
(dotted line) and in the presence of hCA II at a molar ratio of 1:1 (continuous line).
7. (a) Supuran, C. T. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2008, 101, 39; (b) Parkkila, S. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2008,
101, 16; (c) Oostewijk, E. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2008, 101, 2; (d) Pastoreková, S.;
Ratcliffe, P. J.; Pastorek, J. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2008, 101, 8.
fer solution (in the absence of enzyme). The measured hyperfine
coupling constant was typical of a polar medium, being hANi = 17.1.
When in the presence of hCA II, the ESR spectrum of compounds 1
and 6 significantly changed to a slow motion signal, indicating that
binding within the enzyme active site has efficiently occurred. It
should be noted that a very small fraction of labeled compounds
did not interact with the enzyme. This fraction was found to be
of the order of 0.1–3%, as measured from double integration of
the different ESR peaks. The exact amount of non-interacting TEM-
PO-CAIs (whose corresponding peak is indicated by an arrow in
Figure 2A and B) depended both on the structure of the nitroxide
derivative and the molar ratio with respect to hCA II. However,
as mentioned above, in all cases the ESR line shape of TEMPO-CAIs
in the presence of hCA II was completely dominated by the spec-
trum of the bound molecules, which showed the anisotropic fea-
tures characteristic to restricted motional conditions.6–8 A similar
behavior was found for the vast majority of compounds 1–10 (data
not shown) proving that these free radicals were able to interact
strongly with the amino acid residues lining the cavity of the
hCA II enzyme, and making them promising molecules for the
investigation of various CA isozymes by means of ESR techniques.
Both imaging as well as therapeutic applications of such molecules
8. Aaron, J. A.; Chambers, J. M.; Jude, K. M.; Di Costanzo, L.; Dmochowski, I. J.;
9. (a) Boriack, P. A.; Christianson, D. W.; Kingery-Wood, J.; Whitesides, G. M. J.
Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2286; (b) Kim, C. Y.; Chang, J. S.; Doyon, J. B.; Baird, T. T.;
Fierke, C. A.; Jain, A.; Christianson, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12125; (c)
Antel, J.; Weber, A.; Sotriffer, C. A.; Klebe, G. In Carbonic anhydrase – Its
inhibitors Anhydrase—Its Inhibitors and activatorsActivators; Supuran, C. T.,
Scozzafava, A., Conway, J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2004; pp 45–65.
10. (a) Di Fiore, A.; De Simone, G.; Menchise, V.; Pedone, C.; Casini, A.; Scozzafava,
A.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1937; (b) Weber, A.; Casini,
A.; Heine, A.; Kuhn, D.; Supuran, C. T.; Scozzafava, A.; Klebe, G. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 47, 550; (c) Menchise, V.; De Simone, G.; Alterio, V.; Di Fiore, A.; Pedone,
C.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5721.
11. (a) Abbate, F.; Coetzee, A.; Casini, A.; Ciattini, S.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 337; (b) Alterio, V.; De Simone, G.; Monti, S.
M.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4201; (c)
Güzel, Ö.; Temperini, C.; Innocenti, A.; Scozzafava, A.; Salman, A.; Supuran, C. T.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 152.
12. (a) Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. J. Enzyme Inhib. 1998, 13, 103; (b) Supuran, C.
T.; Scozzafava, A.; Jurca, B. C.; Ilies, M. A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 33, 83; (c)
Casini, A.; Scozzafava, A.; Mincione, F.; Menabuoni, L.; Ilies, M. A.; Supuran, C. T.
J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4884; (d) Innocenti, A.; Casini, A.; Alcaro, M. C.; Papini,
A. M.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5224.
13. (a) Cecchi, A.; Winum, J. Y.; Innocenti, A.; Vullo, D.; Montero, J. L.; Scozzafava,
A.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 5775; (b) Puccetti, L.;
Fasolis, G.; Cecchi, A.; Winum, J. Y.; Gamberi, A.; Montero, J. L.; Scozzafava, A.;
Supuran, C. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2759.