10.1002/chem.202002315
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
TEMPO is to be believed to aromatize a radical intermediate (As
shown in Figure 1d, path a) by hydrogen atom abstraction,
which is in line with previous Nicewice’s report.[18a] This result
implies that a fluoroarene radical cation 5 may be involved in the
reaction pathway. Furthermore, Stern-Volmer quenching
experiments were performed to identify the primary radical
species involved in the reaction process. The results indicate
that both 1a (a comparable arene, anisole, has an oxidation
potential, Ep/2 = +1.87 V vs. SCE)[18a] and 2a (a comparable
amine, isopropylamine, has an oxidation potential, Ep/2 = +1.16 V
vs. SCE) can act as reductive quenchers for the excited state of
the photocatalyst t-Bu2-Mes-Acr+* (E1/2 red = +2.15 V vs.
SCE);[18a] however, 1a is more effective than 2a (see the
Supporting Information, Figure S1). These results suggest that a
fluoroarene radical cation and/or an aminium radical cation may
be involved in the reaction pathway. As we have shown, the use
regioselective nucleophilic attack of 5 by 2a at the carbon atom
bearing the fluorine would lead to 6. Then 6 is reduced by the t-
Bu2-Mes-Acr radical to regenerate the photocatalyst and
produce anion 7. Finally, anion 7 eliminates HF to give the
desired product 3aa.
In summary, we have developed a SNAr of unactivated
fluoroarenes with primary aliphatic amines in the presence of an
organic photocatalyst under blue light irradiation. The notable
features of this protocol include mild reaction conditions, wide
substrate scope, and excellently functional group tolerance. In
addition, the utility of this protocol has been demonstrated by the
late-stage functionalization of several complex drug molecules.
Further applications of this strategy towards other synthetically
important nitrogen-containing compounds are currently being
explored in our laboratory.
of
a
weaker
oxidizing
photocatalyst
such
as
Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6 (E1/2*III/II = +1.21 V vs SCE in
MeCN)[19] resulted in no product formation (table 1, entry 1),
which indicates that a fluoroarene radical cation is most likely
involved in the reaction mechanism and that the aminium radical
cation is unlikely. Additionally, we noted that the reaction of 1a
with 2a gives rise to product 3aa upon irradiation, while no
product was formed under darkness (ESI, Figure S2). Moreover,
the quantum yield of the model reaction of 1a and 2a was
determined to be 0.56 (see ESI). These results suggest that this
reaction should undergo a non-chain radical pathway.
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (NNSFC) (no. 91956201), the Program of
Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111
Program, B17019), and the Research Funds for the Central
Universities (no.CCNU20TS015 and CCNU18TS041). We thank
Profs. Wen-Jing Xiao, Liang-Qiu Lu and Jia-Rong Chen all from
CCNU, for helpful discussions.
Keywords: nucleophilic aromatic substitution • unactivated aryl
fluorides • primary aliphatic amines • visible light photocatalysis
[1] Modern Amination Methods (Ed.: A. Ricci), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008
[2] For selected reviews, see: a) P. Ruiz-Castillo, S. L. Buchwald, Chem. Rev.
2016, 116, 19, 12564–12649; b) J. F. Hartwig, Nature 2008, 455, 314–
322; c) D. Ma, Q. Cai, Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450–1460.
[3] a) D G. Brown, J. Boström, J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 4443–4458; b) J.
Boström, D G. Brown, R. J. Young, G. M. Keserü, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.
2018, 17, 709–727.
[4] March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and
Structure, Sixth Ed, Smith, M. B.; March, J. Wiley, Hoboken, 2007, pp.
853-932.
[5] M. Otsuka, K. Endo, T. Shibata, Chem. Comm. 2010, 46, 336–338.
[6] F. Zhu, Z.-X. Wang, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 3694–3702.
[7] a) Transition Metal-Catalyzed Couplings in Process Chemistry: Case
Studies from the Pharmaceutical Industry; Magano, J. and Dunetz, J.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013, pp. 313-354; b) C. J. Welch, J.
Albaneze-Walker, W. R. Leonard, M. Biba, J. DaSilva, D. Henderson, B.
Laing, D. J. Mathre, S. Spencer, X. Bu, T. Wang, Org. Process Res. Dev.
2005, 9, 198–205.
[8] C. B. Jacobsen, M. Meldal, F. Diness, Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 846–851.
[9] a) J.-P. Chen, D.-Y. Huang, Y.-Q. Ding, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 4300–
4304; b) Y.-Y. Lin, M. Li, X.-F. Ji, J.-J. Wu, S. Cao, Tetrahedron 2017, 73,
1466–1472.
Scheme 1. A proposed mechanism.
[10] S. Van Brandt, F. J. R. Rombouts, C. Martínez-Lamenca, J. Leenaerts, T.
R. M. Rauws, A. A. Trabanco, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 7048–7052.
[11] X.-G. Meng, Z.-Y. Cai, S. Xiong, W.-C. Zhou, J. Flu. Chem. 2013, 146,
70–75.
On the basis of these observations, a plausible mechanism
was proposed for this reaction by using la as the aromatic
substrate and 2a as the nitrogen nucleophile (Scheme 1).
Irradiation of t-Bu2-Mes-Acr+ forms an excited state
photocatalyst, t-Bu2-Mes-Acr+*, which could be reduced by 1a to
generate a t-Bu2-Mes-Acr radical and radical cation 5. Owing to
[12] L. J. Bole, L. Davin, A. R. Kennedy, R. Mclellan, E. Hevia, Chem.
Commun. 2019, 55, 4339–4342.
[13] A. Jana, S. P. Sarish, H. W. Roesky, D. Leusser, I. Objartel, D. Stalke,
Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5434–5436.
[14] K. A. Margrey, J. B. McManus, S. Bonazzi, F. Zecri, D. A. Nicewicz, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11288–11299.
the higher positive charge on the ipso carbon in fluoroarene
16, 20]
radical cation relative to anisole radical cation,[14,
the
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.