June 2008
785
3
The column was washed twice with 60 ml methanol (10%) and aqua dest.
(90%). More than 80% of the coupling products were eluted by acetonitrile
100%. The eluted metabolites were evaporated to dryness using a vacuum
rotator at 30 °C.
d2) dH 13.28 (s, 1H, NH aromatic), 9.77 (t, 1H, Jꢃ5.4 Hz, NH, H2ꢅ), 7.35
(dd, 3Jꢃ7.7 Hz, 1H, H6ꢄ), 7.33 (d, 3Jꢃ7.5 Hz, 1H, H5ꢄ or H7ꢄ), 7.14 (d,
3Jꢃ7.9 Hz, 1H, H5ꢄ or H7ꢄ), 6.52 (d, 3Jꢃ10.2 Hz, 1H, H4), 6.47 (d,
3Jꢃ10.2 Hz, 1H, H5), 3.91 (s, 1H, OH heterocyclic), 3.65 (m, Jꢃ5.1 Hz,
3
2H, H4ꢅ), 3.46 (m, 3Jꢃ5.5 Hz, Jꢃ3.9 Hz, 1H, H3ꢅ), 3.41 (m, 3Jꢃ5.5 Hz,
Jꢃ3.9 Hz, 1H, H3ꢅ), 3.18 (t, 3Jꢃ5.1 Hz, 1H, H5ꢅ OH aliphatic), 3.08 (s, 3H,
H8ꢄ), 2.02 (m, 2H, H9ꢄ), 1.17 (m, 6H, H11ꢄ, H12ꢄ, H13ꢄ), 0.82 (m, 3H,
H14ꢄ), 0.76 (m, 1H, H10ꢄ), 0.65 (m, 1H, H10ꢄ). 13C-NMR (100 MHz;
CH2Cl2-d2; determination of proton assignment by hetcor) d 184.9, 181.2
(C6/C3); 170.0 (C1ꢅ); 166.1 (C3ꢄ); 154.8 (C1); 149.1, 136.8, and 121.8
(C7aꢄ/C3aꢄ/C4ꢄ); 139.0 (C4); 134.3 (C5); 133.5 (C6ꢄ); 124.9, 119.4
(C7ꢄ/C5ꢄ); 101.1 (C1); 90.3 (C1ꢄ); 62.7 (C4ꢅ); 42.6 (C3ꢅ); 35.5 (C9ꢄ); 31.8,
29.2, and 22.8 (C13ꢄ/C12ꢄ/C11ꢄ); 23.41 (C10ꢄ); 23.42 (C8ꢄ); 14.1 (C14ꢄ).
LC/MS m/z: APCI, neg. ion mode, 454.2 [MꢁH]ꢁ; API-ES, pos. ion mode,
478.1 [MꢂNa]ꢂ, 933.3 [2MꢂNa]ꢂ; API-ES, neg. ion mode 454.2 [MꢁH]ꢁ.
After 20 min: APCI, neg. ion mode, 454.2 [MꢁH]ꢁ and 456.2 [MꢁH]ꢁ of
the hydroquinone form of 3a; ESI, pos. ion mode, 478.1 [MꢂNa]ꢂ and
480.1 [MꢂNa]ꢂ of the hydroquinone form of 3a; ESI, neg. ion mode 454.2
[MꢁH]ꢁ and 456.2 [MꢁH]ꢁ of the hydroquinone form of 3a. HR-MS
Calcd for C24H29N3O6Na [MꢂNa]ꢂ: 478.1949; Found: 478.1944. HR-MS
Calcd for C24H31N3O6Na [MꢂNa]ꢂ, the hydroquinone form of 3a:
480.2106; Found: 480.2108 (all confirmed by FT-ICR MS).
LC/MS, NMR The products were characterized by liquid chromatogra-
phy/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Atmospheric pressure ionization (API)
mass spectrometry experiments were performed using an Agilent Series
1100 HPLC system and an Agilent 1946C quadrupole mass spectrometer
(Waldbronn, Germany). The mass spectrometer was used with both, APCI
and ESI sources.
HPLC-MS separation was performed on
a
LiChroCART® 125-4,
LiChrosphere® 100 RP-18e column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with the
following binary standard gradient system at a flow rate of 1 ml/min: 14-min
gradient elution from 10 to 100% eluent B (MeOH) where eluent A was
0.1% formic acid in water; 100% eluent B (MeOH) for further 2 min, 10%
eluent B and 90% A for 2 min to equilibrate the column for next run. Chro-
matography was performed at 25 °C and a UV signal recorded at 220 nm
with a variable wavelength detector (VWD). APCI conditions (positive and
negative ion mode) were as follows: nebulizer and drying gas, nitrogen; neb-
ulizer pressure, 30 psig; drying gas flow, 10 l/min; vaporizer temperature,
350 °C; drying gas temperature, 250 °C; capillary voltage, 4 kV; corona cur-
rent, 4 mA.
ESI conditions (positive and negative ion mode): nebulizer and drying
gas, nitrogen; nebulizer pressure, 30 psig; drying gas flow, 10 l/min; drying
gas temperature, 350 °C; capillary voltage, 4 kV.
2-(2,6-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-4-ylamino)-3,6-
dioxo-cyclohexa-1,4-dienecarboxylic acid (2-hydroxy-ethyl)amide (3b)
Synthesis and isolation as described above. Red solid. Yield 63 mg (82%).
LC/MS m/z: ESI, neg. ion mode 382.1 [MꢁH]ꢁ and 787.1 [2(MꢁH)ꢂ
Na]ꢁ; ESI, pos. ion mode, 406.0 [MꢂNa]ꢂ. HR-MS Calcd for C19H18N3O6
[MꢂH]ꢂ: 384.1190; Found: 384.1195 (confirmed by FT-ICR MS).
2-(1ꢀ-Heptyl-1ꢀ-hydroxy-2ꢀ,5ꢀ,7ꢀ-trimethyl-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-
isoindol-4-ylamino)-3,6-dioxocyclohexa-1,4-dienecarboxylic acid (2ꢁ-hy-
droxyethyl)amide (3c) Synthesis and isolation as described above. Red
solid. Yield 75 mg (80%). LC/MS m/z: ESI, pos. ion mode, 492.2 [MꢂNa]ꢂ,
452.2 [MꢁOH]ꢂ, and 961.4 [2MꢂNa]ꢂ; ESI, neg. ion mode 468.2
[MꢁH]ꢁ and 959.5 [2(MꢁH)ꢂNa]ꢁ. HR-MS Calcd for C25H31N3O6Na
[MꢂNa]ꢂ: 492.2110; Found: 492.2091 (confirmed by FT-ICR MS).
2-(1ꢀ-Heptyl-1ꢀ-hydroxy-2ꢀ,5ꢀ,7ꢀ-trimethyl-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-
isoindol-4-ylamino)-3,6-dioxocyclohexa-1,4-dienecarboxylic acid methyl
ester (3d) Synthesis and isolation as described above. Red solid. Yield
75 mg (85%). LC/MS m/z: ESI, pos. ion mode, 441.2 [MꢂH]ꢂ, 463.2
[MꢂNa]ꢂ, and 903.4 [2MꢂNa]ꢂ; ESI, neg. ion mode 439.1 [MꢁH]ꢁ and
901.2 [2(MꢁH)ꢂNa]ꢁ. HR-MS Calcd for C24H29N2O6 [MꢂH]ꢂ: 441.2020;
Found: 441.2019 (confirmed by FT-ICR MS).
All FT-ICR MS high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) experiments
were performed on a Bruker Daltonics APEX III FT-ICR mass spectrometer
(Bremen, Germany) equipped with a 7.0 T shielded superconducting mag-
net. The flow rate for the eluent (H2O/ACN/HCOOH 49/49/2, all HPLC-
grade) was 2 ml/min, using a syringe pump (Cole-Palmer 74900 series). The
ions were generated from an external electrospray ionization source (Apollo
ESI-Source) with nebulizing gas pressure at 20 psi, heated drying gas at 10
psi (back-pressure) and 150 °C, and a capillary entrance voltage of ꢁ4500 V
in negative ion mode and ꢂ4500 V in positive ion mode.26—28)
Mass spectra were acquired with both, positive and negative, ion modes
with broadband detection (32 scans each experiment) from 100 to 2.000 Da
using 1024 K data points. All experimental sequences, including scan accu-
mulation and data processing, were performed with XMASS 6.1.2 on Win-
dows 2000.
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a
Bruker (Karlsruhe, Germany) Avance 600 instrument (1H, 600 MHz) or on a
Bruker ARX 400 with QNP probe head (1H, 400.13 MHz; 13C, 100.61 MHz)
at 25 °C.
Antimicrobial Activity To determine the antimicrobial activity an agar
diffusion assay according to Burkhardt29) was used. Sterile Mueller-Hinton
II-Agar in Stacker Petri discs (Becton Dickinson Microbiology systems,
Cockeysvill, U.S.A.) was inoculated with cells (200 ml of a yeast or bacterial
cell suspension in 20 ml medium) of the yeast Candida maltosa SBUG 700,
the bacterial strains Escherichia coli 11229, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
27853, Bacillus subtilis 6051 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 and
the multiresistant bacteria strains Staphylococcus aureus North German Epi-
demic Strain, Staphylococcus epidermidis 847 and Staphylococcus
haemolyticus 535. Samples were applied in different concentration on sterile
paper discs (Sensi-Disc, 6 mm diameter, Becton Dickinson Microbiology
systems, Cockeysvill, U.S.A.). Plates were kept for 3 h in a refrigerator to
enable prediffusion of the substances into the agar and then incubated for
24 h at 37 °C. Inhibition zone diameters around each of the disc were meas-
ured and recorded at the end of the incubation time. An average zone of in-
hibition was calculated from 3 replicates.
Chemicals Chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers: 2,5-
dihydroxy-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-benzamide (97%, 1a) was received from Mi-
dori Kagaku Co., Ltd. (Japan). Methyl 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (99%, 1b)
and 4-methylcatechol (95%, 1c) are commercially available from Aldrich
(Steinheim, Germany).
2-(1ꢀ-Hexyl-1ꢀ-hydroxy-2ꢀ-methyl-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-4-
ylamino)-3,6-dioxocyclohexa-1,4-dienecarboxylic acid (2ꢁ-hydroxy-
ethyl)amide (3a) Synthesis and isolation as described above. Red solid.
Yield 86 mg (94%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; methanol-d4) dH 7.35 (m,
3Jꢃ8.3 Hz, 3Jꢃ7.5 Hz, 1H, H6ꢄ), 6.99 (d, 3Jꢃ8.7 Hz, 1H, H4), 6.95 (d,
3Jꢃ7.5 Hz, 1H, H5ꢄ or H7ꢄ), 6.74 (d, 3Jꢃ8.7 Hz, 1H, H5), 6.51 (d,
3Jꢃ8.3 Hz, 1H, H5ꢄ or H7ꢄ), 3.71 (m, 3Jꢃ5.6 Hz, 2H, H4ꢅ), 3.49 (m,
3Jꢃ5.7 Hz, 2H, H3ꢅ), 3.39 (s, 3H, H8ꢄ), 2.11 (m, 2H, H9ꢄ), 1.25 (m, 8H,
H10ꢄ, H11ꢄ, H12ꢄ, H13ꢄ), 0.89 (m, 3H, H14ꢄ). 1H-NMR (600 MHz; CH2Cl2-
Acknowledgments Financial support from the government of Mecklen-
burg-Vorpommern, Germany, and from the European Union (Landes-
forschungsschwerpunkt “Neue Wirkstoffe und Biomaterialien–Innovative
Screeningverfahren and Produktentwicklung”) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1) Mikolasch A., Niedermeyer T. H. J., Lalk M., Witt S., Seefeldt S.,
Hammer E., Schauer F., Gesell M., Hessel S., Jülich W. D., Lindequist
U., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 54, 632—638 (2006).
2) Mikolasch A., Niedermeyer T. H. J., Lalk M., Witt S., Seefeldt S.,
Hammer E., Schauer F., Gesell M., Hessel S., Jülich W. D., Lindequist
U., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 55, 412—416 (2007).
3) Critchley I. A., Karlowsky J. A., Draghi D. C., Jones M. E., Thorns-
berry C., Murfitt K., Sahm D. F., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 46,
550—555 (2002).
4) Fluit A. C., Schmitz F. J., Jones M. E., Acar J., Gupta R., Verhoef J.,
Int. J. Infect. Dis., 3, 153—156 (1997).
5) Klugman K. P., Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 3, 171—196 (1990).
6) Shimizu M., Shiota S., Mizushima T., Ito H., Hatano T., Yoshida T.,
Tsuchiya T., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 45, 3198—3201 (2001).
7) Fisher J. F., Meroueh S. O., Mobashery S., Chem. Rev., 105, 395—424
(2005).
8) Waley S. G., “The Chemistry of b-Lactams,” ed. by Page M. I.,
Blackie A. & P., London, 1992, pp. 198—228.
9) Helfand M. S., Bonomo R. A., Curr. Opin. Pharmacol., 5, 452—458
(2005).
10) Liberra K., Jansen R., Lindequist U., Pharmazie, 53, 578—581
(1998).
11) Ohzeki T., Mori K., Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 65, 172—175
(2001).