S.-H. Yoon et al.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 36 (2021) 127780
Fig. 3. Effects of 2a and 16n on iNOS
production in LPS-induced BV2 cells.
BV2 microglial cells were pretreated
with the indicated concentrations of
2a and 16n for 1 h before incubating
with LPS (200 ng/mL) for 6 h (reverse
transcription polymerase chain reac-
tion [RT-PCR]) or 18 h (immunoblot).
Total RNA was prepared for RT-PCR
analysis of iNOS gene expression. Re-
sults are expressed as a ratio of iNOS
and GAPDH (A). Lysates were
analyzed by immunoblotting with
anti-iNOS antibody. Results are
expressed as
a ratio of iNOS and
β-actin (B). GAPDH and β-actin were
used as the internal controls for RT-
PCR analysis and immunoblotting as-
says, respectively. Data are presented
as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3) for three
independent experiments.
trifluoromethyl analogue 16f instead of nitro analogue 16g because the
presence of a nitro group can result in several toxicity issues including
carcinogenicity, hepatotoxicity and mutagenicity.17 This toxicological
issue generally removes compounds containing nitro groups from
screening collections in drug development.18
understand the mechanism of action of 16n. As shown in Fig. 3, the
unstimulated cells released basal levels of iNOS protein while a signifi-
cant increase of iNOS protein was detected in LPS-stimulated BV2 cells.
When the LPS-treated BV2 cells were treated with 16n at different
concentrations (2, 10 and 20 μM), the densities of iNOS protein in the
When the trifluoromethyl group in analogue 16f was moved from the
para position in the benzene ring to the ortho and meta positions, sur-
prisingly, the NO inhibition of the ortho positioned analogue 16n
exhibited significantly higher inhibition (78.3 ± 0.4% with IC50 value of
cells were decreased in a dose-dependent manner. These results
demonstrated that the inhibitory action of 16n in BV2 cell was related to
modulation of iNOS induction.
In conclusion, a series of simplified morpholine analogue of fluoxe-
tine were synthesized and their inhibitory effects on nitric oxide (NO)
production in LPS-induced BV2 cells were tested. Among the synthe-
8.6 μM) than the meta positioned analogue 16m (44.6 ± 1.0%) and the
para positioned analogue 16f (50.3 ± 5.3%). Analogue 16n exhibited a
NO inhibitory activity in a dose-dependent manner, while parent com-
pound 2a revealed almost the same inhibitory effect of 49% in the range
sized compounds, 2-trifluoromethyl analogue 16n (IC50 = 8.6 μM) was
the most potent and exhibited much higher inhibitory effect than the
parent compound 2a (IC50 > 50 M). Analogue 16n suppressed NO
of 12.5–50
μM without cytotoxicity (Fig. 2).
μ
To clarify whether the inhibitory effects of simplified morpholine
analogue of fluoxetine 2 (salt form 2a) and its analogues (6, 8, 11, 13
and 16b–16m) on NO production were related to their toxicity, the
cytotoxicities of analogues were evaluated by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylth-
iazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay, which is a widely
used test to measure cell viability or drug toxicity.19–21 As shown in
Tables 1 and 2, there was no suppression in the cell viabilities of the BV2
cells after being treated with simplified morpholine analogue of fluox-
etine 2 (salt form 2a) and its analogues (6, 8, 11, 13 and 16b–16m) at
production dose-dependently without cytotoxicity and also inhibited
NO production through the suppression of iNOS expression. Our results
suggested that the proper position of the trifluoromethyl group in the
benzene unit is crucial for high suppression of NO production in this
series and that the ortho positioned analogue 16n could be a good lead
compound for the development of useful therapeutic agents to modulate
inflammatory damage associated with microglia activated by LPS.
Declaration of Competing Interest
the concentrations of 20 μM. This result confirmed that the inhibitory
effects on NO production were due solely to its intrinsic activities rather
than its cytotoxicity.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence
the work reported in this paper.
NO is generated from ι-arginine by three distinct isoforms of nitic
oxide synthases (NOS): neuronal NOS (nNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS)
and endothelial NOS (eNOS).22 While the constitutive eNOS and nNOS
play roles in the nervous and cardiovascular system, iNOS often
expressed at high levels by stimulation of pathogen such as LPS.23 Pre-
vious studies showed that agents with the ability to inhibit iNOS
expression are potentially beneficial in the treatment of disease associ-
ated with an overproduction of NO.11,24 Therefore, the inhibition of NO
overproduction and iNOS overexpression via NF-κB may be a useful drug
target molecule for developing effective therapeutic anti-inflammatory
agent.25,26
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded
by the Ministry of Education [NRF-2020R1A2B5B02002032 (to S.-H
Yoon and D.-K Choi) and (NRF-2020R1I1A1A01062002 and
2019R1A6A1A11051471 (to J.-Y Park)].
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Since fluoxetine analogues have inhibitory activities on NO pro-
duction in BV2 cell and iNOS expression at the concentration of 20
Supplementary data (Synthetic procedural and data of intermediates
and target compounds 2, 6, 8, 11, 13 and 16b–16n) to this article can be
μ
M,9,12 we examined the effect of 16n on iNOS mRNA expression and
protein level using RT-PCR and western blot analysis to further
4