Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
therapeutic potential, is currently an active area of research.2
Examples include the C-glycoside R-C-GalCer 2, which was
found to induce a markedly Th1 skewed response,3 while
truncation of one of the lipid chains, such as in OCH 3,4
caused a Th2 bias in NKT cell response.
ability to accept a hydrogen bond,10 and to investigate the
effect of this modification on the immunostimulating proper-
ties.
An R-galactosylceramide construction strategy was envi-
sioned in which the modified sphingosine 6 (Scheme 1)
would be glycosylated with the galactosyl donor 7,11
followed by azide reduction, amide bond formation with 5,11b
and global deprotection. The sphingosine derivative 6 would
be obtained by fluorination of ketone 8, which would be
accessible from the commercially available phytosphingosine
9. Hence, the project started by investigating the conversion
of 9 to 8 aiming for minimal protection/deprotection opera-
tions.
In attempting to differentiate the 4-OH from the other
alcohol groups, direct 1,3-protection, for example as silylene
acetal,12 proved not of use for our purposes. A high-yielding
selective alcohol differentiation was developed from 1-O-
trityl phytosphingosine 11 (Scheme 2). Masking the amino
group of phytosphingosine 9 as an azide13,14 was followed
by regioselective tritylation of 10.15 Subsequent azide
reduction led to 11, upon which treatment with Boc2O
surprisingly led to the 3-O carbonate 12 as the only product
in 80% yield. The origin for the selectivity is unclear. Given
that there is no additional stabilizing group present on the
nitrogen, prior amine protection followed by NfO migration
of the Boc group under steric pressure from the trityl group
is not expected under the employed reaction conditions.16
The functionalization at the 3-position was easily proven by
NMR spectroscopy. This remarkably high-yielding selective
3-OH protection step allowed us to easily obtain the desired
ketone 13 by subsequent protection of the amino group with
At present the relationship between glycolipid structure
and cytokine polarization is not completely understood, but
could relate to the stability of the glycolipid complex with
CD1d,5 or to a difference in glycolipid presenting cells.6
It has been established that the sphingosine 3-OH is much
more important than the 4-OH for antigenic activity.1,20
Following crystallographic studies of CD1d complexed with
KRN70006a,7 and related GalCers,8 it was shown that the
3-OH forms a H-bond with the CD1d Asp80. Furthermore,
the crystal structure of the human NKT TCR in complex
with CD1d bound to 1 reveals a H-bond between the 3-OH
and Arg 95 of the CDR3R-loop.9 Given the apparent pivotal
role of the 3-OH in the interaction with both proteins, it was
decided to synthesize the 4-deoxy-4,4-difluoro KRN7000
analogue 4, in which the 3-OH would display a better
hydrogen bond donating capacity, but a significantly reduced
(2) (a) Wu, D.; Fujio, M.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16,
1073–1083. (b) Savage, P. B.; Teyton, L.; Bendelac, A. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2006, 35, 771–779.
(3) (a) Schmieg, J.; Yang, G.; Franck, R. W.; Tsuji, M. J. Exp. Med.
2003, 198, 1631–1641. (b) Yang, G.; Schmieg, J.; Tsuji, M.; Franck, R. W.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3818–3822. (c) Franck, R. W.; Tsuji, M.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 692–701.
(4) (a) Miyamoto, K.; Miyake, S.; Yamamura, T. Nature 2001, 413,
531–534. (b) Goff, R. D.; Gao, Y.; Mattner, J.; Zhou, D.; Yin, N.; Cantu,
C., III; Teyton, L.; Bendelac, A.; Savage, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 13602–13603.
(5) (a) Berkers, C. R.; Ovaa, H. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005, 26, 252–
257. (b) Oki, S.; Chiba, A.; Yamamura, T.; Miyake, S. J. Clin. InVest. 2004,
113, 1631–1640. (c) Stanic, A. K.; Shashidharamurthy, R.; Bezbradica, J. S.;
Matsuki, N.; Yoshimura, Y.; Miyake, S.; Choi, E. Y.; Schell, T. D.; Van
Kaer, L.; Tevethia, S. S.; Roopenian, D. C.; Yamamura, T.; Joyce, S.
J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 4539–4551.
(10) Review: Be´gue´, J.-P.; Bonnet-Delpon, D.; Crousse, B. Synlett. 2004,
18–29.
(11) (a) Koeman, F. A. W.; Kamerling, J. P.; Vliegenthart, J. F. G.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 5291–5304. (b) Plettenburg, O.; Bodmer-Narkevitch,
V.; Wong, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4559–4564.
(12) Dondoni, A.; Fantin, G.; Fogagnolo, M.; Pedrini, P. J. Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 1439–1446.
(6) (a) Zajonc, D. M.; Cantu, C., III; Mattner, J.; Zhou, D.; Savage,
P. B.; Bendelac, A.; Wilson, I. A.; Teyton, L. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 810–
818. (b) Bezbradica, J. S.; Stanic, A. K.; Matsuki, N.; Bour-Jordan, H.;
Bluestone, J. A.; Thomas, J. W.; Unutmaz, D.; Van Kaer, L.; Joyce, S.
J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 4696–4705. (c) Yang, Y.; Ueno, A.; Bao, M.; Wang,
Z.; Im, J. S.; Porcelli, S.; Yoon, J.-W. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 5913–5920.
(d) Fujii, S.-I.; Shimizu, K.; Kronenberg, M.; Steinman, R. M. Nature
Immunol. 2002, 3, 867–874.
(13) (a) Alper, P. B.; Hung, S.-C.; Wong, C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 6029–6032. (b) Vasella, A.; Witzig, C.; Chiara, J.-L.; Martin-Lomas,
M. HelV. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 2073–2077
.
(14) (a) van den Berg, R. J. B. H. N.; Korevaar, C. G. N.; van der Marel,
G. A.; Overkleeft, H. S.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8409–
8412. (b) van den Berg, R. J. B. H. N.; Boltje, T. J.; Verhagen, C. P.;
Litjens, R. E. J. N.; van der Marel, G. A.; Overkleeft, H. S. J. Org. Chem.
(7) Koch, M.; Stronge, V. S.; Shepherd, D.; Gadola, S. D.; Mathew,
B.; Ritter, G.; Fersht, A. R.; Besra, G. S.; Schmidt, R. R.; Jones, E. Y.;
Cerundolo, V. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 819–826.
(8) Wu, D.; Zajonc, D. M.; Fujio, M.; Sullivan, B. A.; Kinjo, Y.;
Kronenberg, M.; Wilson, I. A.; Wong, C.-H. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.
2006, 103, 3972–3977.
2006, 71, 836–839
.
(15) Kratzer, B.; Mayer, T. G.; Schmidt, R. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
291–298.
(9) Borg, N. A.; Wun, K. S.; Kjer-Nielsen, L.; Wilce, M. C. J.; Pellicci,
D. G.; Koh, R.; Besra, G. S.; Bharadwaj, M.; Godfrey, D. I.; McCluskey,
J.; Rossjohn, J. Nature 2007, 448, 44–49.
(16) (a) Bunch, L.; Norrby, P.-O.; Frydenvang, K.; Krogsgaard-Larsen,
P.; Madsen, U. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 433–435. (b) Valentekovich, R. J.;
Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9069–9070.
4434
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 20, 2008