SCHEME 2. Plausible Mechanism of the Rearrangement
TABLE 1. Substituent Effect on Rearrangement Reaction
FIGURE 2. Iminium ions whose structures were determined by X-ray
crystallography.
as a crystalline product and its structure was determined by
X-ray crystallography. To the best of our knowledge, examples
of X-ray crystallography of iminium ions are very rare8 except
for the case of conjugated iminium ions.9 An example most
resembling the desired iminiums 3 and 7 is Fe(CO)3 complex
of iminium tetrafluoroborate 8 (Figure 2).8b,10 In the case of
the iminium 8, anchimeric participation of the double bond
derived from a homoallylic system and an inert counteranion,
tetrafluoroborate would stabilize the iminium ion. Moreover,
the bulky Fe(CO)3 group may contribute to the stability of the
iminium ion 8. The other examples of nonconjugated iminium
ions 9-11 (Figure 2) whose structures were determined by X-
ray crystallography also had inert counteranions8 and would be
stabilized by an intramolecular interaction with an olefin moiety
(iminium 9)8c or by intermolecular interactions with phenyl
groups of a counteranion (iminium 10).8d In contrast, iminium
compounds 3 and 7 had neither an olefin moiety nor a Fe(CO)3
group participating in stabilization of the iminium ion. Further-
more, iminium ion 3 had a reactive counteranion, the chloride
ion. The X-ray crystallography indicated that the length of
C5-C6 (1.545 Å) in iminium 7b, which was parallel to the
π-orbital of the N1-C23 double bond, was longer than that of
the corresponding C11-C13 bond in saturated compound 12
(1.532 Å) derived from iminium 7a (Figure 1). Parallel bonds
can easily overlap each other. This observation suggested that
the σ bond C5-C6 would interact with the π* bond of the
iminium and that the electronic interaction (hyperconjugation)
may play a crucial role in stabilization of the iminium ion. To
investigate hyperconjugative stabilization of the iminium, we
performed natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis11 with the ab
entry morphinan product
R
yield (%) reaction time (h)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
CPM
i-Bu
Me
Et
allyl
CF3
93
39
95a
93
92
0b
1
2
1.25
1.25
3.5
31.5
a Including some amount of inseparable impurities. b Only the
morphinan 1f was recovered.
FIGURE 1. Structures of compounds 7b and 12 (see the Supporting
Information for CIF files and ORTEP plots of compounds 7b and 12).
iminium 7a in 93% yield without dehydrated product 4 (Table
1, entry 1). The rearrangement reactions of morphinans 1a-e
with some 17-substituents proceeded in moderate to excellent
yields, but iminium 7f was not obtained from morphinan 1f
with the strong electron-withdrawing CF3 group6 at the 17-
position and only the starting material 1f was recovered (entry
6). These results suggested that the 14-hydroxy group may not
be directly mesylated. If the lone pair electrons on the
17-nitrogen initially attacked the sulfene prepared in situ,
followed by migration of the Ms group from the 17-nitrogen to
the 14-hydroxy group, the results shown in Table 1 could be
reasonably explained.7 The strong electron-withdrawing CF3
group6 would drastically reduce the electron density on the 17-
nitrogen and decrease its nucleophilicity, resulting in recovery
of the starting material 1f. Purifications of all the synthesized
iminium 7 compounds (Figure 1) by silica gel column chro-
(8) For X-ray crystallography of nonconjugated iminium salt, see: (a)
Trefonas, L. M.; Flurry, R. L., Jr.; Majeste, R.; Meyers, E. A.; Copeland, R. F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 2145. (b) Birch, A. J.; Fitton, H.; McPartlin, M.;
Mason, M. R. Chem. Commun. 1968, 531. (c) Hollenstein, S.; Laube, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 188. (d) Knop, O.; Cameron, T. S.; Bakshi,
P. K.; Kwiatkowski, W.; Choi, S. C.; Adhikesavalu, D. Can. J. Chem. 1993, 71,
1495.
(9) For X-ray crystallography of conjugated iminium salt, see: (a) Childs,
R. F.; Dickie, B. D.; Faggiani, R.; Fyfe, C. A.; Lock, C. J. L.; Wasylishen, R. E.
J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res. 1985, 15, 73. (b) Childs, R. F.; Shaw, G. S.;
Lock, C. J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5424. (c) Santarsiero, B. D.; James,
M. N. G.; Mahendran, M.; Childs, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9416. (d)
Maas, G.; Rahm, R.; Mayer, D.; Baumann, W. Organometallics 1995, 14, 1061.
(e) Elia, G. R.; Childs, R. F.; Britten, J. F.; Yang, D. S. C.; Santarsiero, B. D.
Can. J. Chem. 1996, 74, 591. (f) Greci, L.; Rossetti, M.; Galeazzi, R.; Stipa, P.;
Sgarabotto, P.; Cozzini, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 2683. (g) Herz,
H.-G.; Schatz, J.; Maas, G. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3176. (h) Nikolai, J.;
Schlegel, J.; Regitz, M.; Maas, G. Synthesis 2002, 497. (i) Reisser, M.; Maier,
A.; Maas, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2071. (j) Levin, V. V.; Dilman, A. D.;
Belyakov, P. A.; Korlyukov, A. A.; Struchkova, M. I.; Tartakovsky, V. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3729. (k) Espenlaub, S.; Gerster, H.; Maas, G.
ARKIVOC (GainesVille, FL, U.S.) 2007, 114.
1
matography were effected. In H NMR, a vinyl proton was
observed at around 9.5 ppm for each iminium mesylate 7.
Among them, compound 7b with a 17-i-Bu group was isolated
(6) Morgenthaler, M.; Schweizer, E.; Hoffmann-Ro¨der, A.; Benini, F.; Martin,
R. E.; Jaeschke, G.; Wagner, B.; Fischer, H.; Bendels, S.; Zimmerli, D.;
Schneider, J.; Diederich, F.; Kansy, M.; Mu¨ller, K. Chem. Med. Chem. 2007, 2,
1100.
(7) The reaction of morphinan 1a with the CPM group seemed to proceed
the most rapidly. This observation might be explained by the consideration of
the very stable cyclopropylcarbinyl cation. A detailed discussion is presented in
the Supporting Information.
(10) (a) Birch, A. J.; Fitton, H. Aust. J. Chem. 1969, 22, 971. (b) Birch,
A. J.; Kelly, L. F.; Liepa, A. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 501.
8094 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 20, 2008