M. Desage-El Murr et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4885–4890
4889
Table 2 (continued)
a
a
Compound
Ar
IC50
(l
M)
Compound
Ar
IC50 (lM)
O
N
N
15j
0.24
15u
0.61
4.45
H
S
S
N
N
N
N
15k
0.51
15v
N
a
IC50 values were determined in accordance with Ref. 9.
shown in Scheme 1. Subsequent Suzuki–Miyaura arylation of the
intermediate 14 with a range of arylboronic acids afforded the tar-
get heterobiaryl-3-ylchromenones (15a–15v). In all cases, reaction
progress was monitored by LC–MS analysis and the products were
purified by semi-preparative HPLC. The DNA-PK inhibitory activity
of both compound libraries is summarised in Tables 1 and 2.
Results and discussion. Our ongoing programme to develop
inhibitors of DNA damage-activated kinases as radio- and chemo-
potentiators in cancer therapy has resulted in the identification
of a number of potent and kinase-selective inhibitors of DNA-PK,
most notably NU7441 (3). That significant inhibitory activity also
resides in the simple 8-biphenylchromenone (4) was surprising,
in light of our previous structure–activity studies indicating that
an extended planar aromatic system at the chromenone 8-position
is a prerequisite for potent DNA-PK inhibition. Previous studies had
also demonstrated that chromenones bearing a biphenyl-3-yl
group (e.g., 4) were more active than the corresponding biphe-
nyl-2-yl and biphenyl-4-yl isomers.11 This is consistent with the
likely disposition of the 3-phenyl group of 4 relative to the termi-
nal aryl ring of the dibenzothiophen-4-yl substituent in 3 within
the ATP-binding pocket. The fact that 4 is approximately 10-fold
more potent than the parent 8-phenylchromenone LY294002 (1,
posal, the weak activity of the analogous pyrrole derivative (5q)
was unexpected. Perhaps not surprisingly, replacement of the pen-
dant phenyl ring of 4 by a pyridyl or pyrimidinyl heterocycle (5u–
5x) resulted in a loss of potency.
The activity of chromenones bearing heteroaryl groups at the 8-
position is summarised in Table 2. Replacement of the 8-phenyl
substituent of 4 by a thiophen-2-yl group (15a and 15b) did not
improve DNA-PK inhibitory activity, although the 4-phenylthio-
phen-2-yl derivative (15b), together with the bithiophene ana-
logue (15c), proved the most potent member of this series
(IC50 = 90 nM). With the exception of the indolyl derivative (15e),
larger heterocyclic groups on the thiophene ring were detrimental
to potency, and where direct comparisons were possible (15a with
15g, and 15c with 15i), replacement of thiophen-2-yl by thiazol-2-
yl was not beneficial. Substitution of the 8-phenyl ring of 4 by a
2- or 4-pyridyl group (15m and 15n) resulted in a reduction in po-
tency, and derivatives bearing other heterocycles on the pyridyl
ring (15o–15v) were all also less active.
In summary, we have identified a novel series of 8-biarylchro-
men-4-ones as inhibitors of DNA-PK that exhibit a range of poten-
cies against the isolated enzyme. Notably, 8-(3-(thiophen-2-
yl)phenyl)chromenone (5i), the most potent of these inhibitors,
was also found to potentiate the cell killing of 2 Gy of ionising radi-
ation by a factor of 1.6 when used at concentration of 500 nM in a
Hela cervical carcinoma cell-based assay.12 This demonstrates that
5i is cell permeable, and that cellular inhibition of DNA-PK is
achievable with this compound at pharmacologically relevant con-
centrations. Overall, the studies described in this letter have fur-
ther elucidated an understanding of SARs for DNA-PK inhibition,
and will provide a platform for ongoing efforts to optimise potency
and in vitro/in vivo activity for this chemotype.
IC50 = 1.6
lM) strongly suggests that the 3-phenyl substituent of
4 is making additional binding interactions within the ATP-binding
domain of DNA-PK. The overall objective of this study was thus to
probe this putative binding interaction further, with a view to
delineating SARs and improving potency.
For the small series of 4-substituted biphenyl-3-ylchromenones
evaluated (5a–5f), it is evident that substitution did not improve
activity, and with the exception of the 4-hydroxy derivative (5a),
which proved to be equipotent with the biphenyl-3-ylchromenone
(4), a 5- to 10-fold reduction in potency was observed (Table 1). A
modest improvement in activity over compounds 5b–5f was ob-
served for the 3,5-disubstituted derivatives (5g and 5h), but both
compounds were less potent than 4. By contrast, replacement of
the 3-phenyl group of 4 by an isosteric thiophen-2-yl (5i) or a thio-
phen-3-yl (5j) substituent improved DNA-PK inhibitory activity
approximately 10-fold, with 5i and 5j exhibiting IC50 values of
18 nM and 20 nM, respectively. Interestingly, the introduction of
a methyl group onto the thiophene ring (5k–5n) proved detrimen-
tal to inhibitory activity, with a 50-fold reduction in potency being
observed for derivatives bearing a methyl group ortho to the het-
eroatom (5k and 5m). This is consistent with the evidence adduced
previously indicating limited steric tolerance at this position. The
high potency exhibited by the thiophene derivatives 5i and 5j
implies that a small electron-rich aryl ring is a prerequisite for
DNA-PK inhibitory activity, and this is supported by the activity
of phenol 5a. However, although the reduced potency of the corre-
sponding 3-furanylchromenones (5o and 5p), the thiazole (5r) and
the imidazole derivatives (5s and 5t) is consistent with this pro-
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Cancer Research UK for financial support.
References and notes
1. Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. Nature 2001, 411, 366.
2. Shiloh, Y. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 155.
3. Smith, G. C. M.; Jackson, S. P.. In Handbook of Cell Signalling; Elsevier Academic
Press, 2003; Vol. 1, p 557.
4. Jackson, S. P. Carcinogenesis 2002, 23, 687.
5. Rosenzweig, K. E.; Youmell, M. B.; Palayoor, S. T.; Price, B. D. Clin. Cancer Res.
1997, 3, 1149.
6. Boulton, S.; Kyle, S.; Yalcintepe, L.; Durkacz, B. W. Carcinogenesis 1997, 17, 2285.
7. Walker, E. H.; Pacold, M. E.; Perisic, O.; Stephens, L.; Hawkins, P. T.; Wymann,
M. P.; Williams, R. L. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 909.
8. Izzard, R. A.; Jackson, S. P.; Smith, G. C. M. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 2581.
9. Griffin, R. J.; Fontana, G.; Golding, B. T.; Guiard, S.; Hardcastle, I. R.; Leahy, J. J. J.;
Martin, N.; Richardson, C.; Rigoreau, L. J. M.; Stockley, M.; Smith, G. C. M. J. Med.
Chem. 2005, 48, 569.
10. Leahy, J. J. J.; Golding, B. T.; Griffin, R. J.; Hardcastle, I. R.; Richardson, C.;
Rigoreau, L.; Smith, G. C. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 6083.