C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. (a) FP-TRMC responses of film samples of 1C12/TEG (red) and
1C12/C12 (blue), and (b) transient absorption spectrum of a film sample of
Figure 2. Schematic representations of rectangular 2D molecular packing
diagrams plausible for liquid crystalline 1C12/TEG
1C12/TEG, at 16 °C upon photoirradiation at 355 nm.
.
nm, the LC film of 1C12/TEG showed a transient absorption at 620
nm (Figure 3b), whose rise and decay profiles were nicely correlated
with those of the TRMC response.8 By reference to chemically
and 37.2 Å, respectively (Figure 2). In sharp contrast with 1C12/TEG
,
hydrophobic 1C12/C12 and hydrophilic 1TEG/TEG showed neither a
phase transition behavior (Figure 1a) nor X-ray diffractions.8 The
absorption spectral patterns of these compounds resembled those
in CHCl3 and remained virtually unchanged over a wide temperature
range from 100 to 20 °C.8
Why does the amphiphilic molecular design of 1C12/TEG enhance
the π-stacking interaction? This is most likely due to a nanoscale
phase separation caused by an incompatibility between the hydro-
phobic and hydrophilic side chains of 1C12/TEG. Figure 2 shows
rectangular 2D molecular packing diagrams, which are most
plausible in that they involve only a minimum contact between the
hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanodomains. Diagram I with a dense
molecular packing is considered more likely than diagram II having
many vacant sites. In fact, the XRD patterns8 and lattice parameters,
observed for sheared and unsheared samples of liquid crystalline
•-
•+ 8
generated radical anion 1C12/TEG and cation 1C12/TEG
, we
noticed in the transient absorption spectrum a clear sign of the
formation of a radical anion species. Namely, liquid crystalline 1C12/
TEG serves as an n-type semiconductor. This finding was beyond
our expectation, while the first reduction potential (-0.90 V) of
1
C12/TEG is close to that of C60 (-1.06 V),12 a representative n-type
semiconductor. From the <φΣµ> value in TRMC along with the
quantity of photochemically generated 1C12/TEG•-, the one-
dimensional electron mobility µ1D of the LC film was evaluated8,11
as 0.27 cm2/V·s at 16 °C. Noteworthy, this is the largest electron
mobility among those reported for room-temperature columnar LC
materials, studied by TRMC.5
While amphiphilic design has been utilized for obtaining 2D
lamellar structures,13 the present work demonstrated that it is useful
for constructing 1D columnar structures. Since high-performance
n-type organic semiconductors are very rare,14 the prominent
electron transport capability, unveiled for π-stacked 1C12/TEG, is
noteworthy. Along with an easy tunability of the redox properties
by central metal ions, the new LC semiconductor with a large
absorptivity for visible light has the potential for solution-
processable photovoltaic materials.
1
C12/TEG, are satisfied only with diagram I. Considering the
rectangular lattice geometry, the LC mesophase is most likely
formed by piling up this 2D layer on top of each other. When the
neighboring 2D layers are disordered along the a-axis, the
hydrophobic and hydrophilic domains would have to contact one
another. Likewise, disordering of the 2D layers along the b-axis
could destabilize the LC, since unfavorable mixing of the rigid core
and flexible side chains would result. Consequently, the π-conju-
gated core is forced to stack up by this nanoscale phase separation.8
Again, the amphiphilic molecular design is essential, since mixing
of hydrophobic 1C12/C12 and hydrophilic 1TEG/TEG resulted in a
macroscopic phase separation without any particular structural
features.
Square-wave voltammetry of amphiphilic 1C12/TEG in CH2Cl2
showed first oxidation and reduction potentials of 0.25 and -0.90
V vs Fc/Fc+, respectively.8 Similar to reported examples,7c the
calculated HOMO-LUMO gap of 1.15 V is obviously smaller than
those of copper porphyrin monomers (2.2-2.4 V),7c and even
smaller than those of perylene diimides (1.4-2.2 V)9 and phtha-
locyanines (1.4-1.8 V).10 This feature is quite beneficial for the
efficient transport of charge carriers. To evaluate the intrinsic
charge-carrier mobility with a minimum grain-boundary effect, we
measured the flash-photolysis time-resolved microwave conductivity
(FP-TRMC)11 of the LC state of 1C12/TEG. Upon exposure to a laser
pulse of λ ) 355 nm at 16 °C,8 the sample showed a prompt rise
of a TRMC signal to furnish in 2.6 µs a maximum transient
conductivity <φΣµmax> of 2.4 × 10-4 cm2/V·s (Figure 3a, red).
For the observed TRMC response, the π-stacking of the 1C12/TEG
core in the columnar LC assembly is crucial, since an amorphous
film of 1C12/C12 exhibited <φΣµmax> of only 0.3 × 10-4 cm2/V·s
(Figure 3a, blue), which is roughly an order of magnitude smaller
than that of liquid crystalline 1C12/TEG. We conducted in situ
transient absorption spectroscopy to identify and quantify the charge
carrier responsible for the TRMC signal. Upon excitation at 355
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and analytical data
of 1C12/TEG, 1C12/C12, and 1TEG/TEG. This material is available free of
References
(1) (a) Forrest, S. R.; Thompson, M. E. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 923. (b) Menard,
E.; Meitl, M. A.; Sun, Y.; Park, J.-U.; Shir, D. J.-L.; Nam, Y.-S.; Jeon, S.;
Rogers, J. A. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 1117.
(2) (a) Murphy, A. R.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 1066. (b)
Funahashi, M.; Zhang, F.; Tamaoki, N. AdV. Mater. 2007, 19, 353.
(3) (a) van Nostrum, C. F.; Picken, S. J.; Schouten, A.-J.; Nolte, R. J. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9957. (b) Warman, J. M.; van de Craats, A. M.
Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2003, 396, 41.
(4) (a) Watson, M. D.; Fechtenko¨tter, A.; Mu¨llen, K. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101,
1267. (b) Piris, J.; Debije, M. G.; Watson, M. D.; Mu¨llen, K.; Warman,
J. M. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 1047.
(5) An, Z.; Yu, J.; Jones, S. C.; Barlow, S.; Yoo, S.; Domercq, B.; Prins, P.;
Siebbeles, L. D. A.; Kippelen, B.; Marder, S. R. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17,
2580.
(6) van de Craats, A. M.; Warman, J. M. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 130.
(7) (a) Tsuda, A.; Furuta, H.; Osuka, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
2549. (b) Tsuda, A.; Osuka, A. Science 2001, 293, 79. (c) Fendt, L.-A.;
Fang, H.; Plonska-Brzezinska, M. E.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, F.; Braun, C.;
Echegoyen, L.; Diederich, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 28, 4659.
(8) See Supporting Information.
(9) Lee, S. K.; Zu, Y.; Herrmann, A.; Geerts, Y.; Mu¨llen, K.; Bard, A. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3513.
(10) Lever, A. B. P.; Minor, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 4015.
(11) Saeki, A.; Seki, S.; Koizumi, Y.; Sunagawa, T.; Ushida, K.; Tagawa, S. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 10015.
(12) Xie, Q.; Arias, F.; Echegoyen, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9818.
(13) For review, see: Tschierske, C. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 2647.
(14) Francesco, B.; Farinola, G. M.; Naso, F.; Ragni, R. Chem. Commun. 2007,
10, 1003.
JA8030714
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 42, 2008 13813