LETTER
Asymmetric Cyanohydrin Synthesis Using Metal(salen) Complexes
2153
Table 2 Synthesis of Mandelonitrile Trimethylsilyl Ether Using
Catalysts 8 and 9
Table 3 Synthesis of Cyanohydrin Trimethylsilyl Ethers Using Cat-
alyst 9d (0.1 mol%)
Catalyst (0.1 mol%) Conversion (%)
ee (%) (config)a
30 (R)
4 (S)
Aldehyde
Conversion (%)
ee (%) (config)a
78 (S)
8a
8b
8c
8d
9a
9b
9c
9d
9
3-MeC6H4CHO
4-MeC6H4CHO
4-MeOC6H4CHO
4-F3CC6H4CHO
CyCHO
86
20
27
31
57
24
53
100
90
78 (S)
20 (S)
100
100
91
45 (S)
46 (S)
77 (S)
4 (S)
73 (S)
62 (S)
C8H17CHO
93
73 (S)
32 (S)
Me2CHCHO
Me3CCHO
85
73 (S)
81 (S)
100
45 (S)
a Determined by chiral GC using the conditions reported in refs. 2–4
after conversion of the mandelonitrile trimethylsilyl ether into man-
delonitrile acetate by the method of Kagan.12
a Determined by chiral GC using the conditions reported in ref. 2–4
after conversion of the mandelonitrile trimethylsilyl ether into man-
delonitrile acetate by the method of Kagan.12
8c were derived from (R)-phenylglycine whilst all of the
other complexes were derived from S-amino acids. There
is only limited structural information available on com-
plexes derived from ligands 7a,c and none on the com-
plexes of ligands 7b,d. However, whilst the only crystal
structure of a salen complex derived from phenylgly-
cinamine shows that the phenyl ring adopts a pseudo-
equatorial position,16 crystal structures of vanadi-
um(salen) complexes derived from 2,3-diaminopropane
indicate that the methyl group can adopt either a pseudo-
axial or a pseudo-equatorial position.17 Thus, the inver-
sion of enantioselectivity observed for complexes 7c and
8c may again be due to a change in the preferred confor-
mation of the salen ligand.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the EPSRC national mass spectrometry service at
the University of Wales, Swansea for recording mass spectra.
References and Notes
(1) For reviews of the development and applications of these
catalysts, see: (a) North, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003,
14, 147. (b) Achard, T. R. J.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; North, M.
Synlett 2005, 1828.
(2) (a) Belokon’, Y. N.; Caveda-Cepas, S.; Green, B.;
Ikonnikov, N. S.; Khrustalev, V. N.; Larichev, V. S.;
Moscalenko, M. A.; North, M.; Orizu, C.; Tararov, V. I.;
Tasinazzo, M.; Timofeeva, G. I.; Yashkina, L. V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3968. (b) Belokon’, Y. N.; North,
M.; Parsons, T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1617. (c) Belokon’,
Y. N.; Green, B.; Ikonnikov, N. S.; North, M.; Parsons, T.;
Tararov, V. I. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 771. (d) Belokon’,
Y. N.; Maleev, V. I.; North, M.; Usanov, D. L. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 4614.
The high catalytic activity of complex 9d can be account-
ed for by the chloride counterion as we have previously
shown that this has a significant influence on the catalytic
activity of the vanadium-based catalysts.2d However, the
high level of asymmetric induction obtained using cata-
lyst 9d was surprising given the poor results obtained with
catalysts 5d, 6d, and 8d which also contain isopropyl sub-
stituents. Therefore, catalyst 9d was screened with eight
other aldehydes as shown in Table 3. With the exception
of the electron-rich 4-methoxybenzaldehyde, all of the ar-
omatic aldehydes studied gave enantioselectivities of 77–
81%. Similarly, with the exception of the sterically hin-
dered pivaldehyde, all of the aliphatic substrates gave a
cyanohydrin derivative with 73% ee. This trend in reactiv-
ity is the same as that previously reported for catalyst
2a.2b,c
(3) Belokon’, Y. N.; Blacker, A. J.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; Hogg,
D.; North, M.; Reeve, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4609; and
references therein.
(4) (a) Belokon’, Y. N.; Blacker, J.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; North,
M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4505. (b) Belokon’, Y. N.; Ishibashi,
E.; Nomura, H.; North, M. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1775.
(c) Belokon, Y. N.; Clegg, W.; Harrington, R. W.; Ishibashi,
E.; Nomura, H.; North, M. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9724.
(5) Belokon’, Y. N.; Green, B.; Ikonnikov, N. S.; North, M.;
Tararov, V. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8147.
(6) (a) Stinson, S. C. Chem. Eng. News 2001, 79, 35.
(b) Gröger, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 547.
(c) Blacker, A. J.; North, M. Chem. Ind. (London) 2005, 22.
(7) Larrow, J. F.; Jacobsen, E. N.; Gao, Y.; Hong, Y.; Nie, X.;
Zepp, C. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1939.
(8) (a) Neumann, W. L.; Rogic, M. M.; Dunn, T. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1991, 32, 5865. (b) Bambridge, K.; Begley, M. J.;
Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3391.
(c) Alvaro, G.; Grepioni, F.; Savoia, D. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 4180. (d) Roland, S.; Mangeney, P.; Alexakis, A.
Synthesis 1999, 228.
In conclusion, it has been shown that the nature of the sub-
stituent(s) within the diamine of a salen ligand influences
on which one of the two enantiotopic faces of an aldehyde
the reaction occurs during metal(salen)-catalysed asym-
metric cyanohydrin synthesis. This effect can be traced
back to the preferred configuration of the salen ligand
around the metal ion.
Synlett 2008, No. 14, 2150–2154 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York