however, γ-lactam 6 remained mostly unreacted, and bicyclic
pyrrole 8 was not formed, indicating the importance of the
lactam ring strain for the success of this reaction.
A scope study of this chemistry was performed, and the
results are shown in Table 2. While substrates with substit-
sterically demanding cyclohexyl (entry 2) germinal to the
ethynyl group and hexyl (entry 3) and phenyl (entry 4) groups
vicinal to the lactam, leading to dihydroindolizinones with
different substitutions at their 1- and 2-positions. Substrates
with the C-C double bond embedded in medium-sized rings
(entries 5 and 6) also reacted well, yielding interesting seven-/
eight-membered ring fused dihydroindolizinones (e.g., 10e
and 10f) in good yields. Surprisingly, the corresponding
cyclopentene or cyclohexene substrates did not afford the
corresponding five-/six-membered ring-fused dihydroindoliz-
inones, and the starting materials were mostly unreacted for
the former and partly decomposed for the later after 10 h.
Table 2. Reaction Scope for the Formation of
Dihydroindolizinonesa
The ꢀ-lactam moiety was also studied for its substitution
scope. Besides ꢀ-methyl, no substitution (entry 7), R-methyl
(entry 8), ꢀ-benzyl (entry 9), R,R-diethyl (entry 10), and R,ꢀ-
diethyl (entry 11) were all allowed, affording products with
various substituents at the dihydroindolizinone 5- and 6-posi-
tions in acceptable yields. Of note, no trans-isomer of 10k
was observed, indicating little or no epimerization at the
carbonyl R-position during the reaction.
When substrate 9l with a phenyl R to the lactam nitrogen
was studied, three compounds were isolated and character-
ized (eq 1). Besides the expected dihydroindolizinone 10l,
isomeric cyclic N-acylpyrrole 11 was isolated in 25% yield
along with benzene-fused tricyclic pyrrole 12 (15%). This
result offers support to the reaction mechanism envisioned
in the initial design (Scheme 2): upon the lactam cyclization,6
ammonium intermediate C could undergo amide bond
heterolytic fragmentation, generating an acyl cation and
eventually affording 10l; alternatively, the fragmentation of
(4) (a) Coates, R. M.; Muskopf, J. W.; Senter, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 3541–3557. (b) Ruck-Braun, K.; Moller, C. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5,
1038–1044.
(5) 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidenegold(I) bis(trifluo-
romethanesulfonyl)imide; for its first catalysis study, see: Li, G.; Zhang,
L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5156–5159. For its synthesis, see:
Ricard, L.; Gagosz, F. Organometallics 2007, 26, 4704–4707.
(6) For related studies, see: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Buehrle, M.; Salathe,
R.; Bats, J. W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2059–2064. (b) Istrate, F. M.;
Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3181–3184. (c) Cariou, K.; Ronan, B.;
Mignani, S.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 1881–1884.
a Reaction conditions: IPrAuNTf2 (5 mol %), THF (0.05 M), 45 °C.
b The ꢀ-lactams were best used right after preparation as most of them
decomposed over time. c Most of the products were prone to decompose
under acidic conditions and over extended exposure to air. d Isolated yield.
e 10 mol % of IPrAuNTf2 was used. f 87% NMR yield was observed using
a higher substrate concentration (0.1 M). g Reaction temperature: 55 °C.
h The other diatereomer was not observed.
(7) For selected previous total synthesis, see: (a) Polniaszek, R. P.;
Belmont, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4688–4693. (b) Jefford, C. W.;
Tang, Q.; Zaslona, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3513–3518. (c) Pearson,
W. H.; Walavalkar, R.; Schkeryantz, J. M.; Fang, W. K.; Blickensdorf,
J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10183–10194. (d) Lee, E.; Li, K. S.;
Lim, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1445–1446. (e) Guazzelli, G.; Lazzaroni,
R.; Settambolo, R. Synthesis 2005, 3119–3123. (f) Sun, Z.; Yu, S.; Ding,
Z.; Ma, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9300–9301. (g) Stead, D.; O’Brien,
P.; Sanderson, A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1409–1412.
uents at the alkyne terminus (e.g., Bu or Ph) did not undergo
this catalytic reaction, various substituents at the C-C double
bond were tolerated, including benzoxyethyl (entry 1) and
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 22, 2008
5189