Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
opening by IMP-1, a typical carbapenemase. Over the course
of reaction between CARBA-H (10 μM) and IMP-1 (2 nM), a
decrease in absorbance at 480 nm was observed along with a
simultaneous increase at 571 nm (Figure 3a). The new
absorption maximum coincided with the reported value of
resorufin.31 A single isosbestic point at 507 nm implied that no
intermediate was formed during the hydrolysis (Figure 3a).
The presence of the expected fragmentation products was
confirmed using HPLC-ESI MS (Figure 3c). Expectedly, the
addition of IMP-1 resulted in the disappearance of signal
corresponding to protonated CARBA-H (9), and the
appearance of those corresponding to the protonated
pyrrolidine 6, quinonemethide 7 and resorufin 8. For the
fluorescence change, CARBA-H (1 μM) provided more than
60-fold fluorescence enhancement upon the addition of IMP-1
(0.5 nM) in only 8 min (Figure 3b). This compares very
favorably with existing reports,10,15−18 e.g., a much higher
concentration (100 nM) of IMP-1 was required (cf. 0.5 nM
IMP-1 for CARBA-H) to achieve a similar degree of
enhancement with CB-1 under otherwise identical condi-
tions.15 The pseudo-first order rate constant for the
spontaneous hydrolysis reaction (PBS, pH 7.4) of CARBA-H
was estimated to be 1.37 × 10−5 s−1 at room temperature,
similar to that of carbapenems (Figure S3).16,19,34,35
We then evaluated the selectivity of the response of
CARBA-H toward carbapenemases over other β-lactamases.
Since NDM, IMP, VIM (Ambler Class B metallo-β-
lactamases), KPC (Class A serine carbapenemases), and
OXA-48-like carbapenemases (Class D serine carbapene-
mases) account for more than 99% of the carbapenemase-
producing isolates,36 a representative member from each of
these families, namely, NDM-1, IMP-1, VIM-2, KPC-2, and
OXA-48, were recombinantly expressed, purified, and utilized
in this study to examine the carbapenemase selectivity and
coverage of our probes (Figure S4). Two common non-
carbapenemases, AmpC (Class C serine β-lactamase) and
TEM-1 (Class A serine β-lactamase), were employed as
negative controls. The fluorescence change of CARBA-H (2
μM) toward the aforementioned enzymes (at 1 nM
concentration except 30 nM for TEM-1) was monitored
over 30 min (Figure 3d). CARBA-H only gave significant
fluorescence enhancement in the presence of carbapenemases
(i.e., NDM-1, IMP-1, VIM-2, KPC-2, and OXA-48), but not
with non-carbapenemases (i.e., AmpC and TEM-1) over the
period.
the detection limits of CARBA-H and CARBA-Me toward
each carbapenemase can be improved upon prolonged
incubation, we chose a 30 min time frame for evaluation
purposes as it represents a reasonable duration for a rapid test.
The detection limits were in picomolar range for both probes
toward VIM-2 and KPC-2, and in subpicomolar range for
Table 1. Detection Limit (3S/k) of CARBA-H (2 μM in
PBS, pH 7.4) Toward Selected Carbapenemases Where S Is
a
the Standard Deviation of 6 Blank Samples
Carbapenemase
3S/k
NDM-1
IMP-1
VIM-2
KPC-2
OXA-48
0.327 pM
0.333 pM
3.28 pM
4.43 pM
30.3 pM
a
λex = 564 nm; λem = 629 nm.
our delight, while OXA-48 led to the slowest turn-on
fluorescence among all the carbapenemases, the corresponding
value is still in the picomolar range.
To gain a better understanding of the substrate-enzyme
interactions between CARBA-H/CARBA-Me and our panel of
carbapenemases, the Michaelis−Menten kinetics model was
adopted. Our enzyme kinetics data showed that CARBA-H
served as an excellent substrate for carbapenemases, explaining
the rapid turn-on response (Table 2, Figure S8). For VIM-2,
a
Table 2. Michaelis-Menten Kinetics Data
enzyme
kcat (s−1
)
KM (μM)
kcat/KM (M−1 s−1
)
NDM-1
IMP-1
VIM-2
KPC-2
OXA-48
29.78 0.81
33.86 0.71
1.96 0.05
2.17 0.07
2.83 0.18
1.66 0.13
1.20 0.08
1.18 0.10
0.93 0.11
0.66 0.08
1.80 × 107
2.82 × 107
1.66 × 106
2.32 × 106
4.25 × 106
a
kcat and KM values for CARBA-H.
KPC-2, and OXA-48, the turnover numbers (kcat/KM) were
found to be in the order of 106 M−1 s−1, while those of NDM-1
and IMP-1 were even in the order of 107 M−1 s−1. In general,
the kcat/KM values for NDM-1, IMP-1, VIM-2, and KPC-2
toward CARBA-H and CARBA-Me are similar to that with
S9).38−42 However, the corresponding values for the reaction
between OXA-48 and CARBA-Me could not be determined,
as the initial hydrolysis rate of CARBA-Me was found to be
independent of OXA-48 concentration. The observation is
again consistent with our preliminary protein labeling study in
which 1β-methyl bearing substrates form a relatively stable acyl
intermediate with OXA-48, thus rendering the Michaelis−
Menten model unsuitable for the analysis.
Rapid Test Assays with Clinical Isolates. Encouraged by
the results, we proceeded to apply CARBA-H to detect
carbapenemase activities in clinical isolates of Klebsiella
pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes (Klebsiella
aerogenes), and Citrobacter freundii, which represent the most
clinically relevant families of carbapenem-resistant Enter-
obacteriaceae.1 Thirteen carbapenemase-encoding strains
were used as positive controls (Figure 4). In addition to
producers of KPC-2 (strain 1) and NDM-1 (strain 2), of which
To validate that the response of CARBA-H was due to bona
fide carbapenemase activity, we tested the effect of phenyl-
boronic acid (PBA), a KPC-specific inhibitor, and ethyl-
enediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a metallo-β-lactamase
inhibitor, on the hydrolysis of CARBA-H by carbapenemases.
In the presence of PBA, only KPC-2 activity was significantly
blunted, and the enzymatic activities of NDM-1, IMP-1, VIM-
2, and OXA-48 were not affected. Meanwhile, in the presence
of EDTA, the activities of NDM-1, IMP-1, and VIM-2 were
inhibited but remained unchanged for KPC-2 (Figure 3e).
Interestingly, OXA-48 displayed a slightly decreased activity in
the presence of EDTA, which is likely due to the increase in
ion concentration.37
We also evaluated the performance of CARBA-Me against
the same panel of carbapenemases (Figure S5). The
fluorescence turn-on profiles for NDM-1, IMP-1, KPC-2, and
VIM-2 were similar to that of CARBA-H; however, CARBA-
Me did not yield a significant response toward OXA-48. While
6890
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6886−6894