configuration, but also confirmed that (+)-irciniastatin A and
(+)-psymberin (1) were in fact one and the same.5 Related
synthetic work followed quickly,6 with a formal synthesis
in 20077 and a second total synthesis reported by the
Schering-Plough group,8 the latter exploiting a novel
(diacetoxyiodo)benzene-mediated cyclization to construct the
central tetrahydropyran core.
We also were intrigued with (+)-psymberin (1) as a
potential new cancer therapeutic lead. Herein we report our
efforts recently culminating in an effective total synthesis
of (+)-1. Central to our synthetic plan was the use of catalytic
reagent control to set the stage for an eventual structure-
activity study to define the structural elements required for
biological activity.9
C(16,17) stereogenic centers. In the forward sense, access
to aldehyde 4 would entail a Diels-Alder reaction between
bis-siloxydiene 611 and allene 7.12 The requisite 2,6-trans-
tetrahydropyran (5) in turn would derive via cyclization of
a linear epoxy alcohol precursor (cf. 8). From the strategic
perspective, installation of the four stereogenetic centers at
C(8, 9, 11 and 13) would take advantage of catalytic reagent
control, beginning with an asymmetric vinylogous Mu-
kaiyama aldol reaction13 to furnish 9. The clear advantage
of this tactic, if successful, would be rapid access to a wide
variety of stereochemically diverse congeners, simply by
changing the enantiomer of the catalyst, thereby avoiding
significant strategy redesign to access analogues for the
prospective structure-activity relationship study.9
With this overview in mind, disconnection of the amide
bond in (+)-1 (Scheme 1), as with the earlier reported
We began with the synthesis of side chain acid 2 employing
known methyl ether (+)-10,5 which was constructed in two
steps with an overall yield of 57% yield (dr > 20:1) from
commercially available (+)-isopropylidene glyceraldyde (Scheme
2). The acetonide was then removed with aqueous hydrochloric
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
acid, followed by masking of the primary alcohol as the pivalate
ester (+)-11; the yield for the two steps was 85%. Subsequent
protection of the secondary alcohol as the SEM ether, followed
by DIBAL-H reduction of the pivalate ester, furnished primary
alcohol (+)-12, which upon a two-step Parikh-Doering14/
Pinnick15 oxidation provided the C(1-6) side chain acid (-)-2
in 89% yield.
Construction of the C(17-25) aryl aldehyde 4 began with
the proposed Diels-Alder reaction between 1,3-bis(trimeth-
ylsiloxy)-1,3-diene 611 and dimethyl-1,3-allene-dicarboxlate
7,12 followed by treatment with HF•NEt3 to effect aroma-
tization leading to known homophthalate 1316 (Scheme 3).
The two phenolic hydroxyls were then protected as SEM
ethers; selective reduction of the alkyl ester in the presence
of the benzylic ester completed construction of aldehyde 4.
The overall yield for the three-step sequence was 55%.
With the side chain and aryl fragments in hand, we turned
attention to the central fragment, tetrahydropyran 5. Beginning
with commercially available 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol (14),
monoprotection as the TBS ether, followed by Parikh-Doering
syntheses,5,7,8 leads to a side chain acid (2) and amide
coupling precursor (3), the latter bearing a Teoc-protected
N,O-aminal. We envisioned that elaboration of the N,O-
aminal could be achieved in a highly stereoselective fashion
exploiting a late-stage Curtius rearrangement similar to that
developed and employed in our total syntheses of (+)-
dactylolide and (+)-zampanolide.10 Further disconnection at
the C(16,17) bond leads to aldehyde 4 and 2,6-trans-
tetrahydropyran 5, which would be joined via a 1,4-substrate
controlled boron-mediated aldol reaction to install the
(5) Jiang, X.; Garcia-Fortanet, J.; DeBrabander, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 11254.
(6) Rech, J. C.; Floreancig, P. E. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5175.
(7) Shangguan, N.; Kiren, S.; Williams, L. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1093.
(8) Huang, X.; Shao, N.; Palani, A.; Aslanian, R.; Buevich, A. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 2597.
(11) Yamamoto, K.; Suzuki, S.; Tsuji, J. Chem. Lett. 1978, 649.
(12) Bryson, T. A.; Dolak, T. M. Org. Synth. 1977, 57, 62.
(13) Simsek, S.; Horzella, M.; Kalesse, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5637.
(14) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505.
(15) Bal, B. S.; Childers, W. E.; Pinnick, H. W. Tetrahedron 1981, 37,
2091.
(9) Smith, A. B., III.; Walsh, S. P.; Frohn, M.; Duffey, M. O. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 139.
(10) Smith, A. B., III.; Safonov, I. G.; Corbett, R. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 11102.
(16) Langer, P.; Kracke, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4545.
5626
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 24, 2008