Organic Letters
Letter
visible-light-induced α-alkylation of silyl enol ethers with
external alkenes under mild reaction conditions (Figure 1c).
The reaction of trimethylsilyl (TMS) enol ether 2, derived
from cyclohexanone, with ethene-1,1-diyldibenzene (1a) was
first carried out in a mixed solvent prepared from acetonitrile
and methanol in the presence of 9,10-dicyanoanthracene
(DCA) as an organic photoredox catalyst, which can oxidize
silyl enol ethers under blue-light irradiation conditions (Table
1, entry 1).11a−d,14 However, instead of the desired product
result indicates that a protic Lewis base for trapping a silyl
cation might be essential for a higher yield.11a−d On one hand,
addition of 1 equiv of water to the reaction system was found
to be very effective as its inclusion led to a dramatically
improved yield (entry 4). The yield became lower when water
was employed in a solvent amount (entry 5). Considering the
stability of the TMS enol ether, the silyl group was changed to
a tert-butyldimethylsilyl group (TBS), which is a bulkier and
more stable silyl group, and the desired product was obtained
in higher yield (entry 6). Further optimization of the reaction
conditions revealed that a slight excess of water (1.2 equiv) was
more effective (entries 7 and 8). Finally, we assessed the
impact of decreasing the amount of 4CzIPN and shortening
the reaction time, and the reaction was found to proceed
within 2 h in the presence of only 2 mol % 4CzIPN (entry 9).
The scalability was tested, and a double-scale reaction also
afforded the desired product in high yield (entry 10).
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
The substrate scope of the reaction was then examined
under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 2). First, a
a
Table 2. Scope of the Reaction with Respect to Alkenes
b
entry
1
R1
R2
product
yield (%)
4-MeC6H4
2-MeC6H4
4-(MeO)C6H4
4-BrC6H4
4-(MeO)C6H4
4-FC6H4
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
3ba
3ca
3da
3ea
3fa
3ga
3ha
3ia
90
73
89
69
87
91
75
76
81
62
90
64
68
78
56
65
42
82
78
56
b
b
,
c
entry
1
SiR3
PC
x
solvent
yield (%)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SiMe3
DCA
−
MeCN/MeOH
(17:3)
0
b
b
b
e
,
,
,
c
d
d
2
SiMe3
4CzIPN
−
−
MeCN/MeOH
(17:3)
MeCN
38
4-(MeO)C6H4
4-FC6H4
3
4
5
6
7
8
SiMe3
SiMe3
SiMe3
SitBuMe2
SitBuMe2
SitBuMe2
SitBuMe2
SitBuMe2
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
4CzIPN
17
77
27
86
92
Ph
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
1.0 MeCN
−
1.0 MeCN
1.2 MeCN
2.0 MeCN
1.2 MeCN
1.2 MeCN
b
b
4-MeC6H4
4-tBuC6H4
4-PhC6H4
4-(MeO)C6H4
3-(MeO)C6H4
2-(MeO)C6H4
4-ClC6H4
4-AcC6H4
4-(NC)C6H4
2-Np
MeCN/H2O (9:1)
3ja
3ka
3la
b
b
b
b
e
85
3ma
3na
3oa
3pa
3qa
3ra
3sa
3ta
c
d
9
92 (90)
81 (80)
e
d
10
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.50 mmol), 2 (0.75 mmol), photocatalyst
(PC, 25 μmol), solvent (total of 5.0 mL), under blue LED (40 W)
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
1
irradiation, 45 °C, 12 h. The yield was determined by H NMR
c
analysis (CH2Br2 as the internal standard). In the presence of
4CzIPN (2 mol %), the reaction was carried out for 2 h. The yields
shown in parentheses are based on the isolated product. The reaction
d
Indene
-(CH2)4-
-(CH2)5-
,
,
f
f
e
3ua
was carried out on a double scale. Reaction conditions: 1a (1.00
mmol), 2 (1.50 mmol), 4CzIPN (20 μmol, 20 mol%), MeCN (10.0
mL), under blue LED (40 W, two light sources) irradiation, 45 °C, 24
h.
a
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.50 mmol), 2a (0.75 mmol), 4CzIPN (25
μmol), MeCN (5.0 mL), under blue LED (40 W) irradiation, 45 °C,
2 h. The shown yield was based on the isolated product. With 0.10
mmol (20 mol %) of benzenethiol (PhSH) added. The reaction was
performed for 48 h. The reaction was performed for 12 h. With 0.25
mmol (50 mol %) of benzenethiol (PhSH) added. Alkene (2.5 mmol,
5.0 equiv) and silyl enol ether (0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were used.
b
c
d
e
(3aa), methanol adduct 4 was obtained [69% yield (see the
by oxidation of the employed alkene [E(1a+•/1a) = +1.81 V vs
SCE] by DCA [E(PC*/PC−•) = +1.97 V vs SCE].15,16 To
address this issue, 1,2,3,5-tetrakis(carbazol-9-yl)-4,6-dicyano-
benzene (4CzIPN), which possess a lower reduction potential
[E(PC*/PC−•) = +1.35 V vs SCE],16 was next employed as a
photocatalyst. Under these conditions, we were pleased to find
that the desired ketone adduct 3aa was obtained without
formation of 4, albeit in moderate yield (entry 2). The reaction
was then conducted in acetonitrile to suppress solvolysis of the
silyl enol ether;10 however, the yield decreased (entry 3). This
f
range of alkenes were employed in the reaction system. The
reaction with ethene-1,1-diyldibenzene, bearing a methyl group
at the 4-position of its aromatic ring, proceeded with excellent
yield (3ba, entry 1). However, the desired adduct was obtained
in low yield when a methyl group was substituted at the 2-
position. To overcome this problem, a catalytic amount of
benzenethiol (PhSH), which was expected to work as a
hydrogen-atom transfer (HAT) agent, was added, and the yield
5694
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5693−5697