11888 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 48, 2001
Lewis et al.
intermediate Ib, thus favoring path b. This is consistent with
the smaller value of ∆EIb for t-4 than for t-2.
This analysis of the di-π-methane rearrangement serves to
further illustrate the power of kinetic modeling of temperature-
dependent data sets to elucidate photochemical reaction mech-
anisms which are too complex for simple kinetic analysis.13
Applications of these methods to other photochemical processes
are in progress in our laboratories.
As noted previously, Hixson4 suggested that the larger value
of Φdiπ for t-3 than for t-1 might result from differences in the
partitioning of intermediate Ia between rearrangement via Ib
vs starting material (Scheme 5). The efficiency of product
formation from Ia, f, can be quantified using eq 12.
Experimental Section
f ) Φdiπ/(Φdiπ + Φnr)
(12)
Materials. trans-1,3-Diphenylpropene (t-1) was prepared by heating
phenylacetaldehyde and potassium in ethanol using the method of
Stoermer et al.14,15 and was purified by recrystallization at -77 °C from
ethanol. trans-1,3-Diphenyl-1-butene (t-2) was prepared by the method
of Higashimura et al.16 via acetyl perchlorate catalyzed dimerization
of styrene and purified by column chromatography. trans-1,3-Diphenyl-
3-methyl-1-butene (t-3) was prepared by a Grignard reaction of
neophylmagnesium chloride and benzaldehyde, followed by dehydration
of the resulting alcohol catalyzed by p-toluenesulfonic acid in benzene,
and then finally purified by column chromatography, as described by
Zimmerman et al.5,17 trans-1,3,3-Triphenylpropene (t-4) was prepared
by the method of Ahlberg et al.18 via the reaction of benzylideneac-
etophenone and phenylmagnesium bromide, reduction of the resulting
ketone with NaBH4, then dehydration of the resulting alcohol.
Compounds t-1-t-3 are colorless oils and t-4 is a colorless crystalline
solid mp ) 94-95 °C (lit.18 mp ) 98-99 °C). All compounds were
found to have greater than 99.9% purity as estimated by GC analysis.
The cis olefins c-1,15 c-2,19 and c-35 were obtained by acetone-sensitized
photoisomerization of the corresponding trans-isomers and purified by
HPLC. The phenylcyclopropanes p-220 and p-35 were obtained from
the corresponding trans-alkenes by irradiation (medium-pressure
mercury lamp, Pyrex filter) in cyclohexane solution. 1H NMR and GC/
MS were used to establish the identity and purity of all compounds.
Spectral data for the cis isomers and phenylcyclopropanes were identical
to those published in the literature. All solvents used for spectroscopy
and photolyses were either spectrophotometric or HPLC grade and were
used as received.
Experimental Methods. GC analysis was performed on a Hewlett-
Packard HP 5890 instrument equipped with a HP1 poly(dimethylsi-
loxane) capillary column. UV-vis spectra were measured on a Hewlett-
Packard 8452A diode array spectrometer with a 1-cm path length quartz
cell. Fluorescence spectra were measured on a SPEX Fluoromax
spectrometer and are uncorrected. Fluorescence quantum yields for
deoxygenated solutions were measured by comparing the integrated
area under the fluorescence curve to that for trans-1-phenylpropene
(Φf ) 0.35, in hexanes7) at equal absorbance at the same excitation
wavelength. The fluorescence quantum yields are corrected for the
refractive index of the solvent. The estimated error is (10%.
Fluorescence decays were measured on a Photon Technologies
International (PTI) LS-1 stroboscopic detection instrument with a gated
hydrogen arc lamp using a scatter solution to profile the instrument
response function. Nonlinear least-squares fitting of the decay curves
was performed with the Levenburg-Marquardt algorithm described by
James et al.21 as implemented by the PTI Timemaster (version 1.2)
Values of f are summarized along with the room-temperature
quantum yield data in Table 2. The values of f for t-1 and t-3
are similar to those calculated by Hixson. Introduction of a single
methyl substituent in t-2 results in a value of f intermediate
between those of t-1 and t-3. The phenyl substituent in t-4 has
a value of f only slightly larger than that of the methyl
substituent in t-2. This plausibly reflects an early transition state
for bond breaking in Ia. The values of f are also temperature
dependent as a consequence of the different activation param-
eters for kIb and knr. The former process has the larger activation
energy and larger preexponential and thus is favored at higher
temperatures, whereas the latter process is favored at lower
temperatures (Figure 5).
Concluding Remarks. The results of this investigation
provide a complete description of the competing photochemical
reactions which occur via the singlet state of several 1,3-
diphenylpropenes. These include isomerization via both the
singlet and triplet states (Scheme 3) and singlet phenyl-vinyl
bridging to yield a diradical intermediate which can either
proceed to the di-π-methane product or revert to starting material
(Scheme 5). Activation parameters have been determined for
both the primary processes (singlet isomerization and phenyl-
vinyl bridging) and diradical processes (nonradiative decay and
product formation). The results of this analysis are consistent
with the stepwise Zimmerman mechanism (Scheme 1, path i)
rather than the Bernardi-Robb concerted migration (Scheme 1,
path ii). The Bernardi-Robb energy surface for 1,4-pentadiene
evidently is not applicable to more complex molecules such as
the 1,3-diphenylpropenes. This illustrates the potential hazard
of using truncated models to calculate potential energy surfaces
for more complex molecules.
Substituents at the 3-position are found to have little effect
on either the absorption and fluorescence spectra or the
temperature-independent rate constants for fluorescence and
intersystem crossing (Tables 1, 3). They do, however, affect
the activation parameters for the competing activated singlet
state processes, isomerization and phenyl-vinyl bridging (Tables
3, 4). Activation energies for both processes decrease with
increasing 3-substitution. Phenyl-vinyl bridging has both a lower
activation energy and a lower preexponential than isomerization,
and is the dominant reaction pathway for t-2-t-4 at temperatures
between 160 and 350 K. At temperatures below 160 K triplet
isomerization and fluorescence are the major processes, whereas
above 440 K singlet isomerization is expected to be the major
pathway.
Substituents at the 3-position also affect the partitioning of
the diradical intermediate Ia (Scheme 5). Ring opening leading
to the product has larger preexponentials and larger activation
energies than ring opening to regenerate the ground-state reactant
(Table 5), resulting in complex temperature dependence for the
quantum yield ratios (Figure 5). Activation energies for the ring
opening leading to product decrease with increasing 3-substitu-
tion. This could result from either relief of angle strain or
stabilization of the diradical Ib.
(13) For examples see: (a) Saltiel, J. A.; Zhang, Y.; Sears, D. F., Jr. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11202-11210. (b) Catala´n, J.; Zima´nyi, L.;
Saltiel, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2377-2378. (c) Lewis, F. D.; Li,
L.-S.; Kurth, T. L.; Kalgutkar, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8573-
8574.
(14) Stoermer, R.; Their, C.; Laage, E. Chem. Ber. 1925, B85, 2607-
2615.
(15) Raunio, E. K.; Bonner, W. A. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 396-399.
(16) (a) Sawamoto M.; Masuda T.; Nishii H.; Higashimura T. J. Polym.
Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 1975, 13, 279-282. (b) Higashimura T.; Nishii H. J.
Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed. 1977, 15, 329-339.
(17) Calcott, W. S.; Tinker, J. M.; Weinmayr, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1939, 61, 1010-1015.
(18) Ahlberg P.; Janne K.; Lofas S.; Nettelblad F.; Swahn L. J. Phys.
Org. Chem. 1989, 2, 429-447.
(19) Ella, S. W.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 5777-5791.
(20) Fox, M. A.; Chen, C. C.; Campbell, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48,
321-326.
(21) James, D. R.; Siemiarczuk, A.; Ware, W. R. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1992,
63, 1710-1716.