Schoening et al.
SCHEME 1. Plausible Reaction Mechanism for the
Alkoxyamine Formation
that byproducts were formed in the reaction of R-oxo radicals
with nitroxide radicals, which impaired the overall yield. We
reasoned that these problems might be overcome by employing
aliphatic aldehydes under the same reaction conditions (Scheme
1, R′ ) H).
The known fact that aldehydes are less prone to oxidation in
the presence of stable nitroxide radicals24 was one important
factor for this reaction to occur in a reliable fashion. Also, the
reaction rate of the radical scavenging process by nitroxide
radicals was so favorable that no homocoupling products were
obtained in significant amounts. Thus, we were able to
demonstrate that aldehydes are a superb source for the generation
of intermediate alkyl radical species and eventually alkoxyamines.
benzenes.14 Further methods involve ene-like additions of
oxoammonium cations15 or nitroxide radicals16 to alkenes, the
use of dithianes,17 photolysis reactions,18 SN2-type reactions of
alkoxides,19 the reaction of nitrosoarenes with nitrogen oxides,20
and even Meisenheimer-type rearrangements.21 A comprehen-
sive overview on state-of-the-art methods is given in a number
of excellent reviews and monographs.22
Recently, we reported on the use of ketones and hydrogen
peroxide to efficiently create alkyl radical precursors.23 The
copper(I) chloride-catalyzed decomposition of these peroxide
intermediates in the presence of tetramethylpiperidine N-oxyl
radicals represents a straightforward way to obtaining the desired
alkoxyamines (Scheme 1).
Results and Discussion
During our investigation into the formation of alkoxyamines
we used 4-hydroxy-TEMPO (Prostab 5198)25 as nitroxide
radical, since this building block provided auspicious opportuni-
ties for subsequent chemical modifications.26 When reacting
mixtures of 4-hydroxy-TEMPO, catalytic amounts of copper(I)
chloride, and various aldehydes with 30-50% aqueous hydrogen
peroxide solution, we observed smooth conversions into the
respective N-alkoxyamines. As depicted in Table 1, primary,
secondary, and even tertiary aldehydes resulted in the anticipated
products, whereby secondary and tertiary aldehydes seemed to
give marginally smoother reactions. In most cases only small
excesses (∼1.3 equiv) of aldehyde in relation to the nitroxyl
radical were required to achieve satisfactory yields. However,
in the case of acetaldehyde and longer chain aldehydes (>6
carbon atoms), higher amounts were necessary to obtain
adequate yields. We attribute this behavior to the slightly higher
sensitivity of these aldehydes toward oxidation. Also, the heat
of formation in the case of S-1 was significantly higher than
with most other aldehydes. A larger aldehyde quantity was also
required for the dimeric compound S-7 in order to obtain a
homogeneous product in a high yield.
The transformations presented were mostly executed between
room temperature and 35 °C but may also be conducted at
temperatures up to 45 °C (or even higher) to speed up the
progress of the reactions. At higher temperatures the decom-
position of hydrogen peroxide became rampant and necessitated
higher dosages of the oxidant. In general, the reactions can be
conducted with or without solvents. We learned that basically
any solvent may be employed as long as it tolerates the presence
of the oxidant. Among the solvents effectively tested were
hexane, toluene, methyl tert-butyl ether, methylene chloride,
alcohols, and water. Biphasic mixtures showed reaction rates
comparable to those of homogeneous ones, though the use of
phase-transfer catalysts proved to be advantageous in some
cases. We also approached the question as to how much copper
catalyst is required and which is the best one. Evidently, all
copper sources catalyze the formation of alkoxyamines in this
setup. In addition to the mentioned copper(I) chloride, other
copper(I) salts promote the reaction equally well, independent
of the solvent system used. By contrast, when the activity of
copper(II) salts was evaluated, a clear solvent dependence was
Notwithstanding the fact that this reaction was successfully
applied to synthesize a broad range of alkoxyamines, an element
of limitation was the moderate selectivity in the radical transfer
process (R vs R′). The problem was exacerbated by the fact
(12) Braslau, R.; Anderson, M. O.; Rivera, F.; Jimenez, A.; Haddad, T.; Axon,
J. R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5513–5523.
(13) (a) Judd, D.; Shum, S. P.; Pastor, S. D. Polyoxometalate catalysts
for the preparation of sterically hindered N-substituted aryloxyamines. US
Patent 2003208071, 2003; CAN 139:350640. (b) Pastor, S. D.; Shum, S. P.
Transition-metal-catalyzed preparation of sterically hindered N-substituted
alkoxyamines and compositions. PCT Patent Appl. WO 2002079182, 2002;
CAN 137:295596.
(14) Grubbs, R. B.; Wegrzyn, J. K.; Xia, Q. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1, 80–
82.
(15) (a) Pradhan, P. P.; Bobbitt, J. M.; Bailey, W. F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
5485–5487. (b) Schaemann, M.; Chaefer, H. J. Synlett 2004, 9, 1601–1603.
(16) (a) Dufils, P.-E.; Chagneux, N.; Gigmes, D.; Trimaille, T.; Marque,
S. R. A.; Bertin, D.; Tordo, P. Polymer 2007, 48, 5219–5225. (b) Schulte, B.;
Studer, A. Synthesis 2006, 13, 2129–2138. (c) Wetter, C.; Studer, A. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 2, 174–175.
(17) Herrera, A. J.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2005, 9, 1389–1396.
(18) Bertin, D.; Couturier, J. L.; Gigmes, D.; Guerret, O.; Guillaneuf, Y.
Process for preparation of alkoxyamines by photolysis of dithiocarbamates. Fr.
Patent FR 2884517, 2006; CAN 145:421104.
(19) Moon, B.; Kang, M. Macromol. Res. 2005, 13, 229–235.
(20) Astolfi, P.; Carloni, P.; Damiani, E.; Greci, L.; Marini, M.; Rizzoli, C.;
Stipa, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 19, 3279–3285.
(21) (a) Zedda, A.; Ferri, G.; Sala, M. Production of steric hindered cyclic
amine ethers for stabilizers for polymers. Ger. Patent DE 19907945, 1999; CAN
131:185784. (b) Bergbreiter, D. E.; Walchuk, B. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 6380–
6382. (c) Tabushi, I.; Hamuro, J.; Oda, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 53, 5581–
5584.
(22) (a) Sciannamea, V.; Jerome, R.; Detrembleur, C. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108,
1104–1126. (b) Nesvadba, P. Chimia 2006, 12, 832–840. (c) Bertin, D.; Gigmes,
D.; Marque, S. R. A. Recent Res. DeV. Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 63–121. (d) Studer,
A.; Schulte, T. Chem. Rec. 2005, 5, 27–35. (e) Studer, A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004,
33, 267–273. (f) Togo, H. AdVanced Free Radical Reactions for Organic
Synthesis, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2004. (g) Tirrell, D. A. J. Polym. Sci.,
Part A: Polym. Chem. 1998, 36, 2667–2668. (h) Volodarsky, L. B.; Reznikov,
V. A.; Ovcharenko, V. I. Synthetic Chemistry of Stable Nitroxides; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, 1994.
(23) (a) Dichtl, A.; Seyfried, M.; Schoening, K.-U. Synlett 2008, 12, 1877.
(b) Schoening, K.-U.; Fischer, W.; Basbas, A.-I.; Dichtl, A. Process for the
preparation of sterically hindered nitroxyl ethers. PCT Patent Appl. WO
2008003602, 2008; CAN 148:144654.
(24) Minisci, F.; Recupero, F.; Cecchetto, A.; Gambarotti, C.; Punta, C.;
Faletti, R.; Paganelli, R.; Pedulli, G. F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1, 109–119.
(25) Commercial Product of Ciba Inc.
(26) The same reactions were also conducted with TEMPO, but because of
limited options for further chemical transformations this nitroxide radical is of
little use in industrial applications.
1568 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 4, 2009