R. Haddoub et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 741–744
743
Table 1
References and notes
Immobilization of the alkynyl aloisines
R2
R2
1. Dhavan, R.; Tsai, L. H. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 749–759.
2. Morgan, D. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997, 13, 261–291.
N
N
N
N3
R1
R1
i
Linker
+
3. See for example: Cohen, P. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 309–315;
Malumbres, M.; Barbacid, M. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1, 222–231.
4. Fischer, P. M. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2001, 4, 623–634.
5. Bain, J.; Plater, L.; Elliott, M.; Shapiro, N.; Hastie, J.; McLauchlan, H.; Klevernic,
I.; Arthur, J. S. C.; Alessi, D.; Cohen, P. Biochem. J. 2007, 408, 297–315.
6. See for example: Trapp, J.; Jochum, A.; Meier, R.; Saunders, L.; Marshall, B.;
Kunick, C.; Verdin, E.; Goekjian, P.; Sippl, W.; Jung, M. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
7307–7316.
7. Knockaert, M.; Greengard, P.; Meijer, L. TRENDS Pharmacol. Sci. 2002, 23, 417–
425; Knockaert, M.; Gray, N.; Damiens, E.; Chang, Y.-T.; Grellier, P., et al Chem.
Biol. 2000, 7, 411–422.
8. Knockaert, M.; Gray, N.; Damiens, E.; Chang, Y. T.; Grellier, P.; Grant, K.;
Fergusson, D.; Mottram, J.; Soete, M.; Dubremetz, J. F.; LeRoch, K.; Doerig, C.;
Schultz, P. G.; Meijer, L. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 411–422.
N
R
N
H
N
N
N
22 : Agarose
N
H
23 : LCC-Reactospheres
Linker
i : DIPEA, CuI, MeCN
Alkyne-Aloisine
R1
R2
Azido-Gel
Product
18
19
2
21
21
OMe
OMe
OTHP
OH
H
22
22
22
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C4H9
C4H9
C4H9
C4H9
OH
9. Knockaert, M.; Wieking, K.; Schmitt, S.; Leost, M.; Mottram, J.; Kunick, C.;
Meijer, L. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 25493–25501.
10. Meijer, L.; Skaltsounis, A. L.; Magiatis, P.; Polychronopoulos, P.; Knockaert, M.;
Leost, M.; Ryan, X. P.; Vonica, C. A.; Brivanlou, A.; Dajani, R.; Crovace, C.;
Tarricone, C.; Musacchio, A.; Roe, S. M.; Pearl, L.; Greengard, P. Chem. Biol. 2003,
10, 1255–1266.
11. Bach, S.; Knockaert, M.; Reinhardt, J.; Lozach, O.; Schmitt, S.; Baratte, B. J. Biol.
Chem. 2005, 280, 31208–31219.
12. Mettey, Y.; Gompel, M.; Thomas, V.; Garnier, M.; Leost, M.; Ceballos-Picot, I.,
et al J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 222–236.
13. Mapelli, M.; Massimiliano, L.; Crovace, C.; Seeliger, M.; Tsai, L. H.; Meijer, L.;
Musacchio, A. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 671–679.
14. Corbel, C.; Haddoub, R.; Guiffant, D.; Lozach, O.; Gueyrard, D.; Lemoine, J.;
Ratin, M.; Meijer, L.; Bach, S.; Goekjian, P.G., unpublished results.
15. Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–
2021.
16. Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 1128–1137.
17. Vierfond, J. M.; Mettey, Y.; Mascrier-Demagny, L.; Miocque, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1981, 22, 1219–1222.
The affinity chromatography assays were performed on porcine
brain extracts using the different gels (see Supplementary data
Fig. S1). While a detailed biological discussion of the results will be
reported in due course,14 a qualitative analysis of the results permits
a few relevant observations: comparing the results using the com-
pound 1 immobilized on cyanogen bromide-activated agarose with
those of the gel 27 having essentially the same structure, although
the capacity of the latter is lower (consistent with the lower degree
of functionalization of the commercial epoxy sepharosecomparedto
cyanogen-bromide activated agarose), the same target proteins are
retained, and are not retained by the ethanolamine control. This
demonstrates that the aloisine analogs were indeed immobilized
by click chemistry to the azido-substituted Epoxy-Agarose gel. The
reactosphere gel (28), although having the advantage of greater
chemical stability, appears to bind the same target proteins, but also
leads to more extensive non-specific binding. Comparison of the re-
sults obtained with the different gels (see Supplementary data
Fig. S2) shows that it is in fact possible to obtain qualitative struc-
ture-activity relationships against the entire proteome by affinity
chromatography. Although we have used a very limited library as
a proof of concept, the synthesis of the precursors and the immobi-
lization and affinity chromatography protocols are sufficiently sim-
ple to be applied to larger focused libraries.
In conclusion, we have described the preparation of immobi-
lized forms of aloisine for selectivity screening by affinity chroma-
tography, based on the incorporation of an acetylene group,
followed by late stage immobilization, either in solution or in the
solid state. This method represents an advantageous solution to
the problem of incorporating hydrophilic and chelating polyethyl-
ene glycol chains that are often incompatible with the synthesis of
the original compounds. This approach is efficient enough for
immobilizing small libraries for selectivity optimization against
complete cell extracts.
18. Eduardo, F. M.; Correa, J.; Irene, R. M.; Ricardo, R. Macromolecules 2006, 39,
2113–2120.
19. Typical procedure for the Sonogashira reaction: Synthesis of compound 6: PPh3
(61 mg, 0.23 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (378 mg, 0.54 mmol), and 1.1 g of compound
5 (3.9 mmol., prepared by THP protection of the 4-hydroxybenzonitrile) were
dried for 30 min in a schlenk tube. 10 mL of THF, 2.7 mL of TEA (19.5 mmol),
and 1.1 mL of (trimethylsilyl)acetylene (7.8 mmol) were added to the mixture.
After 30 min, CuI (0.05 equiv) were added to the solution. The reaction mixture
was stirred at rt under an atmosphere of argon for 12 h. The solvent was
removed under vacuum and the solid was filtered off. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography over silica gel and was eluted with PE/EA
(85/15). Yield 900 mg (77%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): d (ppm) 7.68 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz);
7.50 (1H, dd, J = 8.7 Hz, J = 2.2 Hz); 7.12 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz); 5.60 (1H, s); 3.80
(1H, dt, J = 2.6 Hz, J = 11.0 Hz); 3.60 (1H, m); 2.05–1.60 (6H, m); 0.25 (9H, s).
HRMS calcd for C17H21NO2Si: 300.1420; found: 300.1420.
20. Davis, M.; Wakefield, B.; Wardell, J. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 939–952.
21. Typical procedure: Synthesis of compound 7: n-pentylpyrazine (175 mg,
1.16 mmol) was added to a freshly prepared solution of LDA (2.32 mmol in
4 ml of THF-hexane) at ꢀ40 °C under argon. After 30 min, compound
6
(180 mg, 0.58 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added, and the solution was stirred for
30 min at ꢀ40 °C and for 18 h at rt, then hydrolyzed with a saturated aqueous
solution of NH4Cl. After extraction with ethyl acetate, the organic layer was
dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography over silica gel and was eluted with EA/PE (2/
8) to yield a mixture of compound 7 and 2, from which a pure fraction of 7 was
characterized. 1H NMR: (300 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm) 12.60 (1H, s); 8.40 (1H, d,
J = 2.8 Hz); 8.20 (1H, d, J = 2.7 Hz); 7.90 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz); 7.68 (1H, dd,
J = 8.8 Hz, J = 2.4 Hz); 7.25 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz); 5.68 (1H, br s); 4.00 (1H, m); 3.68
(1H, m); 2.99 (2H, t, J = 7.7 Hz); 2.10–1.60 (8H, m); 1,40 (2H, m); 0,90 (3H, t,
J = 7.3 Hz); 0.25 (9H, s). HRMS calcd for C26H33N3O2Si: 448.2420; found:
448.2423.
Acknowledgments
We thank Pr. Laurent Meijer, Dr. Stéphane Bach, Pr. Jérôme
Lemoine, and Miss Caroline Corbel for the biological and protein
studies shown in the supplementary materials. Financial support
from the European Union (Contract No. LSHB-CT-2004-503467)
and a partial Ph.D. scholarship from 3Ds Lebanon (RH) are grate-
fully acknowledged. We also thank LCC Engineering & Trading
GmbH, CH-2246 Egerkingen, Switzerland for providing a sample
of LCC-Reactospheres beads.
22. Typical procedure for the click reaction: Synthesis of compound 8. To a stirred
solution of compound 2 (320 mg, 0.85 mmol) in MeCN (10 mL) were added
280 mg of compound 3 (0.85 mmol). After 20 min at rt, 445 lL of DIPEA
(2.55 mmol) and a catalytic amount of CuI (ꢁ0.05 equiv) were added, the
resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 14 h and the reaction
was stopped by adding 2 mL of water. The resulting solution was extracted
with ethyl acetate, the organic phase washed with NaCl, dried over Na2SO4, and
concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash
chromatography over silica gel and was eluted with EA/PE (95/5). Yield
520 mg (86%). 1H NMR: (300 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm) 11.10 (1H, br s); 8.72 (1H, d,
J = 2.1 Hz); 8.40–8.30 (3H); 8.22 (1H, d, J = 2.9 Hz); 7.72 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz); 7.65
(1H, dd, J = 8.6 Hz, J = 2.1 Hz); 7.42 (1H, d, J = 8.9 Hz); 7.25 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz);
5.60 (1H, br s); 4.62 (2H, t, J = 4.9 Hz); 4.20 (2H, t, J = 5.0 Hz); 3.90 (2H, t,
J = 5.1 Hz); 3.83 (1H, m); 3.70 (1H, m); 3.62–3.58 (6H, m); 3.05 (2H, t,
J = 7.7 Hz) 2.43 (3H, s, CH3Ts); 2.00–1.65 (8H, m); 1.45 (2H, tq, J = 7.5 Hz); 0.88
(3H, t, J = 7.4 Hz). HRMS calcd for C36H44N6O7S: 705.3070; found: 705.3068.
23. Lober, S.; Gmeiner, P. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8699–8702.
Supplementary data
Affinity chromatography results with the immobilized aloisines.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in