to rationalize the results when n ) 2. One idea considered was
whether or not some type of direct C-H abstraction or other
process terminated the Heck addition, possibly stabilized
through a six-membered palladacycle, facilitating the transposi-
tion of the olefin to the ketone (eq 2).
Table 3. Probe of the Tandem Heck-Isomerization Mechanism
entry reagent
conditions
convn (%)
To test this hypothesis, deuterium-labeled substrate 1b was
synthesized and subjected to reaction conditions (eq 3).9
Migration of the deuterium was observed yielding a 2:1
mixture of isomers of 4b. If a direct C-H activation was
the active pathway, the deteurium label should have remained
unaffected. This result is consistent with formation of a
traditional Heck adduct containing an olefin, followed by
reversible hydropalladation-dehydropalladation as the mech-
anism of migration. This would eventually lead to enol
formation (which is a thermodynamic sink as the enol
tautomerizes to and is trapped as the ketone).
5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 1.5 equiv LiCl,
NaHCO3, DMF, 50 °C, 0.5 h
5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 1.5 equiv LiCl,
NaHCO3, DMF, 50 °C, 0.5 h
5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 1.5 equiv LiCl,
NaHCO3, DMF, 50 °C, 24 h
5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 1.5 equiv LiCl,
NaHCO3, DMF, 50 °C, 24 h
10 mol % Et3N, 10 mol % Pd/C
(5 mol % Pd), toluene, 80 °C
10 mol % Et3N, 10 mol % Pd/C
(5 mol % Pd), toluene, 80 °C
5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 5 mol % PhBr,
1.5 equiv LiCl, NaHCO3, DMF, 50 °C, 1 h
5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 1.5 equiv LiCl,
NaHCO3, Bu4NBr, DMF, 50 °C, 1 h,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3b
5b
3b
5b
3b
5b
5b
5b
0
0
<5
<5
<5
20c
∼5
<5
a All bases and solvents used were anhydrous unless otherwise specified,
and reactions were run on 0.500 mmol scale under N2 atmosphere. b The
conversion to 4b was determined by LCMS monitoring using UV detection
at 220 nM. c A complex mixture of several adducts and starting material
formed.
conditions did cause 5b to isomerize to some extent, albeit
with a complex mixture of side products. When a 1:1 ratio
of aryl bromide versus palladium catalyst was added, no
appreciable isomerization occurred (Table 3, entry 7).
Addition of tetrabutylammonium bromide to the reaction also
had no effect (Table 3, entry 8). The combination of these
results suggest that although clearly olefin migration may
be part of the mechanism, there must be additional nonclas-
sical factors in the reaction at work to facilitate this relatively
facile transformation.
In conclusion, we have developed mild and efficient
conditions that led in high yields to functionalized 1,5-
diarylalkanone products. Notably, this protocol avoids the
use of phosphine ligands and the formation of regioisomeric
and cyclized products that are common during this type of
transformation. We were able to apply this route to synthesize
several arrays of otherwise difficult to access medicinal
chemistry targets, the results of which will be reported in
due course.
Although the deteurium labeling result was consistent with
a stepwise isomerization mechanism, additional information
was needed to support this result. When adducts 3b and 5b,10
presumably initial adducts formed from the Heck reaction,
were subjected to the optimized reaction conditions, less than
5% migration product (4b) was observed after 30 min (Table
3, entries 1 and 2). Prolonged reaction time did not
significantly increase migration and resulted in the formation
of multiple products (Table 3, entries 3 and 4). This result
was not unexpected as the requisite palladium hydride would
likely not be generated without the initial aryl bromide
present. Attempts to apply modified conditions, whereby a
palladium hydride-iminium complex is generated in situ,11
still did not produce isomerization of 3b to 4b. These
(5) (a) Gangjee, A.; Yu, J.; Kisliuk, R. L.; Haile, W. H.; Sobrero, G.;
McGuire, J. J. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 591. (b) Qadir, M.; Priestley, R. E.;
Rising, T. W. D. F.; Gelbrich, T.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Sheldrake,
P. W.; Whittall, N.; Hii, K. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3675. (c) Ohno,
H.; Okumura, M.; Maeda, S.-I.; Iwasaki, H.; Wakayama, R.; Tanaka, T. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7722. (d) Dyker, G.; Grundt, P. HelV. Chim. Acta
1999, 82, 588. (e) Dyker, G.; Markwitz, H. Synthesis 1998, 1750. (f) Dyker,
G.; Grundt, P.; Markwitz, H.; Henkel, G. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6043.
(6) (a) Larock, R. C.; Leung, W.-Y.; Stolz-Dunn, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 6629. (b) Berthiol, F.; Doucet, H.; Santelli, M. Synthesis 2005,
20, 3589.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details;
1H and 13C NMR, HRMS, and HPLC results for selected
products. This material is available free of charge via the
OL900036Y
(7) Hay, M. B.; Hardin, A. R.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
3099.
(10) Adduct 5b was prepared by the procedure of Kimura, M.; Matsuo,
S.; Shibata, K.; Tamaru, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3386.
(11) Recently reported conditions to isomerize allyl alcohols to the
corresponding carbonyl compounds: Coquerel, Y.; Bremond, P.; Rodriguez,
J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 4805.
(8) Migration by sequential hydropalladation-dehydropalladation.
(9) 1b-(D) was synthesized with >95% incorporation of deuterium in
four steps from benzaldehyde (see Supporting Information).
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 5, 2009
1185