10.1002/cctc.202000738
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
Conclusion
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China (21975135, 21672119), and China
Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M641624).
In conclusions, rGO supported Ag NPs (Ag-rGO) was disclosed
as an efficient catalyst for the synthesis of alkylidene carbonates
from CO2 under atmospheric pressure. The structure and
component of Ag-rGO has been fully characterized, suggesting
the homogeneously dispersed Ag (0) species on rGO surface.
Notably, Ag-rGO-3 also exhibits excellent performance for the
three-component reaction (propargylic alcohols, diethylamine,
and CO2) and the reaction of propargyl amines with CO2 at
ambient conditions. More importantly, Ag-rGO can be easily
reused at least five times without obvious activity losing or
structure damage. The present work reveals a promising
approach for the utilization of CO2 in industry.
Keywords: carboxylative cyclization • carbon dioxide • graphene
oxide• heterogeneous catalyst • sliver nanoparticles
a) I. Omae, Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 1384-1405. b) J. Artz, T. E.
Mgller, K. Thenert, J. Kleinekorte, R. Meys, A. Sternberg, A. Bardow, W.
Leitner, Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 434–504.
a) Q. Liu, L. Wu, R. Jackstell, M. Beller, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5933-
5948. b) M. He, Y. Sun, B. Han, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9620-
9633.
a) S. Wang, C. Ci, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019,48, 382-404. b) D.-G. Yu, Z.
Zhang, T. Ju, J.-H. Ye, Synlett 2017, 28, 741-750. c) B. Yu, B. Zou, C.-W.
Hu, J. CO2 Utili. 2018, 26, 314-322. d) Q.-W. Song, Z.-H. Zhou, L.-N. He,
Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3707-3728.
Experimental Section
a) ) K. Ohe, H. Matsuda, T. Morimoto, S. Ogoshi, N. Chatani, S. Murai, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4125–4126 b) H. Zhang, H. B. Liu, J. M. Yue,
Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 883–898, and the references cited therein.
a) W. Yamada, Y. Sugawara, H. M. Cheng, T. Ikeno, T. Yamada, Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 2007, 2604– 2607. b) S. Yoshida, K. Fukui, S. Kikuchi,
T. Yamada, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4072–4073. c) Y. Kayaki, M.
Yamamoto, T. Ikariya, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4194–4197. d) Y.
Wu, Y. Zhao, R. Li, B. Yu, Y. Chen, X. Liu, C. Wu, X. Luo, Z. Liu, ACS
Catal. 2017, 7, 6251-6255. e) Y. Zhao, Y. Wu, G. Yuan, L. Hao, X. Gao,
Z. Yang, B. Yu, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 2735-2740. f)
J. Hu, J. Ma, Q. Zhu, Q. Qian, H. Han, Q. Mei, B. Han, Green Chem. 2016,
18, 382-385. g) K. Chen, G. Shi, R. Dao, K. Mei, X. Zhou, H. Li, C. Wang,
Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 7830-7833. h) J. Qiu, Y. Zhao, Z. Li, H. Wang,
M. Fan, J. Wang, ChemSusChem, 2016, 10, 1120-1127. i) Q.-W. Song,
W.-Q. Chen, R. Ma, A. Yu, Q.-Y. Li, Y. Chang, L.-N. He, ChemSusChem,
2017, 8, 821-827. j) Q.-W. Song, B. Yu, X.-D. Li, R. Ma, Z.-F. Diao, R.-G.
Li, W. Li, L.-N. He, Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1633-1638. k) Q.-W. Song, L.-
N. He, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 1251-1258. l) L. Ouyang, X. Tang, H.
He, C. Qi, W. Xiong, Y. Ren, H. Jiang, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2556-
2565. m) Y. Yuan, Y. Xie, C. Zeng, D. Song, S. Chaemchuen, C. Chen, F.
Verpoort, Green Chem. 2017, 19, 2936-2940. n) Y. Yuan, Y. Xie, C. Chen,
F. Verpoort, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 2935-2939.o) Z.-H. Zhou, C.-X.
Guo, J.-N. Xie, K.-X. Liu, L.-N. He, Current Org. Synth. 2017, 14, 1185-
1192.
Materials
Carbon dioxide (99.99%) was purchased from Liquefied Air (Tianjin) Co.,
Ltd. All reagents were purchased from Aladdin or Energy Ltd. and used as
received without further purification.
Synthesis of GO and Ag-rGO.[15]
Graphite oxide (GO) was synthesized by a modified Hummers method.[9a]
A total of 50 mg of GO was added to 30 mL of ethylene glycol and
sonicated for 2 h to disperse the GO well. A total of 200 mg of AgNO3 was
dissolved in a mixture of 5 mL H2O and 15 mL ethylene glycol. This mixture
was then added to the GO/ethylene glycol mixture and stirred for 2 h at
50 °C. Next, 40 mL of 0.1 mol/L sodium borohydride solution was added
slowly and the reaction mixture was heated for 2 h at 110 °C. After the
reaction, a black solid was observed at the bottom of flask. Then, the
reaction mixture was filtered and the product was washed with distilled
water and dried under vacuum.
Catalyst characterization techniques.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed with a Tecnai G2
F20 transmission electron microscope operating at 200 KV. Field emission
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out with a MERLIN
Compact that was assembled with an energy-dispersive X-ray
spectrometer (EDS). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was
performed with an Axis Ultra DLD instrument using Al Kα radiation (1486.7
eV, 150 W). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained with a
MimFLex600 diffractometer at a scanning rate of 0.5°/min using Cu Kα
radiation in the 2θ range of 5°–80°. FT-IR was recorded with a Bruker
Tensor27 FT-IR spectrophotometer using KBr pellets with the range of
4000–400 cm-1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed with an
Axis Ultra DLD instrument that was fitted with nitrogen purge gas with a
heating rate of 5 °C/min from 0–800°C. Raman spectra were recorded on
a Renishaw inVia Raman Microprobe with 514.5 nm laster excitation from
200 to 2500 cm-1.
a) Z. Yang, B. Yu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, Z. Ma, G. Ji, X. Gao, B.
Han, Z. Liu, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1268-1273. b) X. Yu, Z. Yang, F. Zhang,
Z. Liu, P. Yang, H. Zhang, B. Yu, Y. Zhao, Z. Liu, Chem. Commun. 2019,
55, 12475-12478. c) D. Chakraborty, P. Shekhar, H. D. Singh, R.
Kushwaha, C. P. Vinod, R. Vaidhyanathan, Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14,
4767–4773.
Cyclization of Propargylic Alcohols.
Z. Zhou, C. He, L. Yang, Y. Wang, T. Liu, C. Duan, ACS Catal. 2017, 7,
2248-2256.
Propargylic alcohol (1a, 84.1 mg, 1 mmol), Ag-rGO-3 (8.4 mg, 10 wt%
relative to 1a) and base (0.05 mmol) were combined in a 10-mL Schlenk
tube. Then, the Schlenk tube was attached to a CO2 balloon and the
solution was stirred for 12 h at 30 °C. After the reaction completed, the
balloon of CO2 was taken off. The liquid phase was then diluted with 10 ml
CH2Cl2, and biphenyl (20 mg) was added to be used as an internal
standard. The yield of products was determined by gas chromatography
(GC). The Ag-rGO catalyst was separated by centrifugation. Then it was
washed with ethanol three times and dried at 60 °C for 4 h for subsequent
use. GC analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu GC-2014 that was
equipped with a capillary column (RTX-50, 30 m × 0.25 μm) with a flame
ionization detector. 1H NMR spectra were recorded using 400 MHz
spectrometers with CDCl3 as a solvent referenced to CDCl3 (7.26 ppm).
13C NMR was recorded in CDCl3 (77.00 ppm) at 100.6 MHz.
S.-L. Hou, J. Dong, X.-L. Jiang, Z.-H. Jiao, B. Zhao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2019, 58, 557–581.
a) L. Tian, M. J. Meziani, F. Lu, C.-Y.Kong, L. Cao, T. J. Thorne, ACS Appl.
Mater. Inter. 2010, 2, 3217-3222. b) C. N. Rao, A. K. Sood, K. S.
Subrahmanyam, A. Govindaraj, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7752-
7777. c) D. A. Dikin, S. Stankovich, E. J. Zimney, R. D. Piner, G. H.
Dommett, G. Evmenenko, S. T. Nguyen, R. S. Ruoff, Nature. 2007, 448,
457-460. d) S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, G. H. Dommett, K. M. Kohlhaas, E.
J. Zimney, E. A. Stach, R. D. Piner, S. T. Nguyen, R. S. Ruoff, Nature.
2006, 442, 282-286. e) S. Park, R. S. Ruoff, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4,
217-224. f) D. Chen, H. Feng, J. Li, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6027-6053.
a) R. Zhao, M. Lv, Y. Li, M. Sun, W. Kong, L. Wang, S. Song, C. Fan, ACS
Appl. Mater. Inter. 2017, 9, 15328-15341. b) R. Zhao, W. Kong, M. Sun,
Y. Yang, W. Liu, M. Lv, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2018, 10, 17617-17629. c)
Acknowledgements
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.