to form azomethine ylide E5–9,14 followed by ring closure
reaction (Scheme 6). Both reaction pathways would also
give oxazoline products. However, no oxazoline products were
observed experimentally in our study.
In conclusion, we have shown the first example of carbon–
carbon bond cleavage of the aziridine ring in a nucleophilic
aziridine ring opening reaction. N-Styryl-3-aryl-1-methylazaridine-
2-carboxamides, which are readily obtained from the CuI/
DMGC-catalyzed cross coupling reaction of 3-aryl-1-methyl-
aziridine-2-carboxamides with 1-aryl-2-bromoethenes, are able to
undergo efficiently a base-mediated intramolecular aziridine ring
opening reaction via carbon–carbon bond cleavage to afford the
ring expanded imidazolidin-4-one products. The carbon–carbon
bond cleavage of the aziridine ring should open a new avenue for
the exploration of new applications of aziridine compounds in
organic synthesis.
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China, Ministry of Science and Technology, and Chinese
Academy of Sciences for financial support.
Notes and references
1 For a recent monograph about aziridine chemistry, see: Aziridines
and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis, ed. A. K. Yudin, Wiley-VCH,
2006.
Scheme 6 Plausible pathway for the tandem cross coupling reaction
and ring transformation.
2 For recent reviews on aziridine chemistry, see: (a) H. M. Osborn
and J. Sweeney, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 1693;
(b) X. E. Xu, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 2701; (c) W. McCoull and
F. A. Davis, Synthesis, 2000, 1347; (d) J. B. Sweeney, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2002, 31, 247.
3 For recent examples, see: (a) C. S. Park, H. G. Choi, H. Lee,
W. K. Lee and H.-J. Ha, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 3283;
(b) T. B. Sim, S. H. Kang, K. S. Lee and W. K. Lee, J. Org. Chem.,
2003, 68, 104; (c) J. M. Yun, T. B. Sim, H. S. Hahm and W. K. Lee,
J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 7675; (d) Y. Kim, H.-J. Ha, K. Han,
S. W. Ko, H. Yun, H. J. Yoon, M. S. Kim and W. K. Lee,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 4407; (e) B. K. Lee, M. S. Kim,
H. S. Hahm, D. S. Kim, W. K. Lee and H.-J. Ha, Tetrahedron,
was proposed. As depicted in Scheme 6, CuI/DMGC-catalyzed
cross coupling reaction of amides and 1-aryl-2-bromoethenes
results in the formation of aziridine-containing enamides. Under
the basic conditions, deprotonation of enamides occurs to form
amide anion intermediate A, which can be stabilized by the styryl
group. Intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the amide nitrogen
at the C-3 of the aziridine ring leads to carbon–carbon bond
cleavage to form intermediate B. Subsequent O-protonation and
tautomerization furnish the imidazolidin-4-one products. It is
worth addressing the regiospecific nucleophilic attack of amide
nitrogen on the C-3 of aziridine ring, which might be regarded as
a disfavored process according to Baldwin’s rules,12 is probably
due to its close proximity to the C-3 position. More likely, it is
the electrophilic nature of the benzylic C-3 that determines the
regiospecific nucleophilic aziridine ring opening reaction. The
cleavage of the carbon–carbon bond rather than carbon–
nitrogen bond of the aziridine ring is most probably attributed
to the release of the ring strain by forming a more stable
five-membered imidazoline intermediate B. The stabilization
energy gained from the formation of conjugation in B may also
contribute to the ring transformation pathway. It should also be
noted that, due to the weaker electrophilicity of the aziridine ring
in comparison to the oxirane ring, and because of the weaker
reactivity of enamide than enamine, neither intramolecular
aryl–aziridine cyclization nor enamine–aziridine cyclization
took place. A similar intramolecular aryl–epoxide cyclization10
and intramolecular enamine–epoxide cyclization11 in the
analogous oxirane-containing enamide derivatives were reported
(Scheme 2). Alternatively, imidazolin-4-one products 4 and 6
2006, 62, 8393; (f) B. Denolf, S. Mangelinkx, K. W. Tornroos and
¨
N. De Kimpe, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 3129; (g) T. Manaka,
S.-I. Nagayama, W. Desadee, N. Yajima, T. Kumamoto,
T. Watanabe, T. Ishikawa, M. Kawahata and K. Yamaguchi,
Helv. Chim. Acta, 2007, 90, 128; (h) F. Crestey, M. Witt,
K. Frydenvang, D. Staerk, J. W. Jaroszewski and H. Franzyk,
J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 3566.
4 (a) J.-Y. Wang, D.-X. Wang, Q.-Y. Zheng, Z.-T. Huang and
M.-X. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 2040; (b) J.-Y. Wang,
D.-X. Wang, J. Pan, Z.-T. Huang and M.-X. Wang, J. Org. Chem.,
2007, 72, 9391; (c) J.-Y. Wang, X.-F. Guo, D.-X. Wang,
Z.-T. Huang and M.-X. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 1979.
5 Y. Gelas-Mialhe, T. Touraud et Roger and R. Yessiere, Can. J.
Chem., 1982, 60, 2830.
6 S. Takano, T. Iwabuchi and K. Ogasawara, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1988, 1204.
7 J. Vebrel, D. Gree and R. Carrie, Can. J. Chem., 1984, 62, 939.
8 A. Derdour and F. Texier, Can. J. Chem., 1985, 63, 2245.
9 S. Takano, M. Moriya and K. Ogasawara, Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry, 1992, 3, 681.
10 L. Yang, G. Deng, D.-X. Wang, Z.-T. Huang, J. Zhu and
M.-X. Wang, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 1387.
11 L. Yang, Q.-Y. Zheng, D.-X. Wang, Z.-T. Huang and
M.-X. Wang, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2461.
12 J. Baldwin, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1976, 734.
13 J. March, AdvancedOrganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons Inc.,
1992, 4th edn., pp. 1128–1129 and references cited therein.
14 The authors are grateful to a referee for have their attention to
alternative mechanisms describing the observed conversion.
might also be formed from electrocyclization of C,13,14
a
tautomer of 3, and from spontaneous ring opening of aziridine
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
424 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 422–424