terminal alkynes.8e,10 We were pleased to find after the
reaction that substituted 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-ones were
isolated exclusively. Both aromatic and aliphatic alkynes are
compatible with this process, thereby giving an inexpensive,
diverse, and convenient approach to assemble these hetero-
cycles. Herein, we disclose our results.
As indicated in Table 1, we initiated our studies by
conducting a coupling reaction of N-benzyl-2-bromobenza-
Table 1. Coupling of N-Benzyl-2-bromobenzamide with
Phenylacetylene under Different Conditionsa
entry
ligandb
base
solvent
yieldc (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K3PO4
Cs2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
DMF
85
86
83
50
<10
82
82
37
70
47
17
30
0
i-PrOH
DMSO
dioxane
toluene
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
i-PrOH
Figure 1. Structures of some biologically important 3-methyl-
eneisoindolin-1-ones and their derivatives.
isoindolinones and aldehydes was developed. However, this
method required additional steps to prepare phosphorylated
reagents.2b,5 The lack of an efficient approach to 3-methyl-
eneisoindolin-1-ones has stimulated intensive studies for
assembly of these heterocycles via metal-catalyzed reactions.6
The successful examples include a Sonogashira reaction of
2-iodobenzamides with terminal alkynes followed by NaOEt-
mediated cyclization,6c Heck-Suzuki-Miyaura domino
reactions involving ynamides,6d and a Sonogashira reaction-
carbonylation-hydroamination of 2-bromoiodobenzene.6f
Among them, Kundu’s method is quite attractive because
both 2-halobenzamides and terminal alkynes are conveniently
available.6c In Kundu’s report, (Ph3P)2PdCl2 and CuI were
utilized for promoting the cross-coupling reaction, leading
to a mixture of open-chain condensation products and
heteroannulation products in most cases.6c The pure 3-me-
thyleneisoindolin-1-ones had to be obtained by treatment of
the mixture with NaOEt. In addition, when aliphatic alkynes
were employed a mixture of 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-ones
and isoquinolinones was formed.6c These shortcomings
limited its application in organic synthesis.
no
a Reaction conditions: 4a (1 mmol), 5a (1.5 mmol), CuI (0.1 mmol),
ligand (0.3 mmol), solvent (2 mL), 85 °C, 24 h. b Key: (A) L-proline; (B)
N,N-dimethylglycine; (C) pipecolinic acid; (D) 2-picolinic acid; (E) ethyl
2-cyclohexanonecarboxylate; (F) N,N-dimethylethylenediamine. c Isolated
yield.
mide with phenylacetylene. It was found that under the
catalysis of CuI/L-proline and heating at 85 °C for 24 h in
DMF, 3-methyleneisoindolin-1-one 6a was isolated as a
single product in 85% yield (entry 1). Similar results were
observed when the solvent was changed to i-PrOH and
DMSO (entries 2 and 3). However, poor yields were obtained
if the reaction was carried out in dioxane or toluene (entries
4 and 5). Switching base to K3PO4 and Cs2CO3 had little
influence to this reaction (entries 6 and 7). Further investiga-
tion revealed that ligand is essential for this process, as
evident from the unsatisfactory yields that were observed
when N,N-dimethylglycine, pipecolinic acid, 2-picolinic acid,
ethyl 2-cyclohexanonecarboxylate, and N,N-dimethylethyl-
enediamine were used (entries 8-12) and the fact that no
In connection with our project to develop new heterocycle
synthesis via amino acid-promoted Ullmann-type reac-
tions,7-9 we became interested in using CuI/amino acid to
catalyze the coupling reaction of 2-bromobenzamides and
(7) Ma, D.; Cai, Q. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450.
(5) Couture, A.; Deniau, E.; Grandclaudon, P.; Lebrun, S. Synlett 1997,
1475.
(8) (a) Lu, B.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6115. (b) Lu, B.; Wang, B.;
Zhang, Y.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5337. (c) Zou, B.; Yuan, Q.;
Ma, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2598. (d) Zou, B.; Yuan, Q.; Ma,
D. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4291. (e) Liu, F.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
4844. (f) Chen, Y.; Xie, X.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9329. (g)
Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 625. (h) Wang,
B.; Lu, B.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2761. (i)
Yuan, Q.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5159. (j) Guo, L.; Li, B.; Huang,
W.; Pei, G.; Ma, D. Synlett 2008, 1833.
(6) (a) Uozumi, Y.; Kawasaki, N.; Mori, E.; Mori, M.; Shibasaki, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3725. (b) Wu, M.-J.; Chang, L.-J.; Wei, L.-
M.; Lin, C.-F. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 13193. (c) Kundu, N. G.; Khan, M. W.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 4777. (d) Couty, S.; Liegault, B.; Meyer, C.; Cossy,
J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2511. (e) Yao, T.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 1432. (f) Cao, H.; McNamee, L.; Alper, H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5281.
(g) Sun, C.; Xu, B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7361.
1310
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009