G. Jin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 606–609
609
5. Lu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Tawatao, R.; Cottam, H. B.; Sen, M.; Leoni, L. M.;
Kipps, T. J.; Corr, M.; Carson, D. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004,
101, 3118.
6. Lu, D.; Cottam, H. B.; Corr, M.; Carson, D. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102,
18567.
7. Park, C. H.; Hahm, E. R.; Lee, J. H.; Jung, K. C.; Yang, C. H. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 2005, 331, 1222.
8. Teo, J.-L.; Ma, H.; Nguyen, C.; Lam, C.; Kahn, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005,
102, 12171.
9. Barker, N.; Clevers, H. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 997.
10. Twentyman, P. R.; Lambert, E.; Muller, M.; Rees, J. K. Leukemia 1992, 6,
726.
11. Woltersdorf, O. W., Jr.; DeSolms, S. J.; Schultz, E. M.; Cragoe, E. J., Jr. J. Med.
Chem. 1977, 20, 1400.
12. Zhao, G.; Liu, C.; Wang, R.; Song, D.; Wang, X.; Lou, H.; Jing, Y. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2007, 15, 2701.
13. Aizawa, S.; Ookawa, K.; Kudo, T.; Asano, J.; Hayakari, M.; Tsuchida, S. Cancer Sci.
2003, 94, 886.
14. Takahashi-Yanaga, F.; Sasaguri, T. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 104, 293.
15. Rossi, A.; Kapahi, P.; Natoli, G.; Takahashi, T.; Chen, Y.; Karin, M.; Santoro, M. G.
Nature 2000, 403, 103.
16. Wnt signaling inhibition method I: The human embryonic kidney cell line
HEK293 was grown and transfected with various expression plasmids
encoding proteins in the Wnt and b-catenin pathway, exactly as described
previously.6 They included the b-catenin regulated TOPFlash reporter gene
and expression plasmids for Wnt1, Wnt3, b-catenin, DSH, LRP6, as
described.
17. Wnt signaling inhibition method II: To determine the specificity of
compounds on Wnt/b-catenin pathway inhibition, CellSensor LEF/TCF-bla
SW480 cell-based assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used according to
the supplier’s instructions, but modified for 96 well format. Cells were
plated at 25,000 cells/well in assay medium in 96-well black plates with
clear bottom (Corning) the day prior to compound treatment. Compounds
reduction of the
a–b double bond by hydrogenation (Fig. 1, EA-R
and Table 1, compound 42), suggesting that this Michael acceptor
function is essential for its activity.
Several compounds were found to effectively decrease CLL sur-
vival and antagonize Wnt signaling at low micromolar concentra-
tions (25, 29, 31, 37, 39 and 40). These results correlate with our
earlier findings that Wnt signaling genes are over-expressed and ac-
tiveinCLL.5 ItispossiblethatEAderivativesmightinhibitWntsignal-
ing by covalent modification of sulfhydryl groups of Wnt-dependent
genes such as Lef-1 (which is highly expressed in CLL) and this possi-
bility is the subject of ongoing studies in our laboratories.
Structure–activity trends among the amides in terms of Wnt sig-
naling inhibition revealed that aromatic-containing amides were
generally more active than aliphatic amides. Moreover, the larger
aromatic substitutions (benzothiazole, phthalimide, naphthyl car-
boxylicacid,etc.)showedgoodactivityinbothsystems.Itisnotewor-
thy that the IC50s for inhibition of Wnt signaling are consistently
lower than the EC50s for inhibition of CLL survival, except for most
of the aromatic carboxylic acids. This suggests that the active EA
derivatives may have some other target receptor in the cell, a target
that may impact CLL survival in addition to the Wnt signaling alone.
An example of a possible off-target receptor for the EA derivatives
might be inhibition of NF-jB activity through direct inhibition of
IKK-b, wherein the cysteine 179 in the activation loop of IKK-b can
be covalently modified by Michael acceptors.15 Two well known
examples of this are prostaglandin J2 and prostaglandin A1, both of
which contain the a,b-unsaturated carbonyl function, and thus the
EA derivatives may be acting in a similar manner.
were added to cells at a final concentration ranging from 33.3 to 0.5 lM,
incubated for 20 h and then combined with LiveBLAzerTM-FRET B/G
Substrate (CCF4-AM) for 2 h at room temperature. Fluorescence emission
values at 465 and 535 nm were obtained using
a standard fluorescence
In summary, we have synthesized amides of EA19–23 with
enhanced potency, relative to EA, toward the inhibition of Wnt sig-
naling and of CLL cell survival (Table 1 and Fig. 2 see Supplement).
Differences in the potency among the various derivatives may be
simply due to relative efficiency of compound delivery to cells
and their ability to access the nuclear compartment and make con-
tact with transcription factors important in Wnt signaling.
Further in vivo studies of these amide compounds are
underway.
plate reader and the 465/535 ratios were calculated for each treatment
(n = 2 for each data point). Results were normalized to untreated control
cells (set at 100%, n = 4), plotted as
% of control, and EC50 determined
using Prism 4.0a software (GraphPad).
18. Fresh CLL or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were plated at
2.5 Â 105 per well and treated with compounds for 48 h. Then 1/10 V of 5 mg/
mL MTT was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C overnight. Finally, ½ V of
Lysis buffer was added to dissolve the insoluble purple formazan product,
incubated at 37 °C overnight, and OD at 570 nm was read and recorded.
19. General procedure for synthesis: To a mixture of 1 mmol of ethacrynic acid in
10 mL of benzene, 1 mL of thionyl chloride was added. The mixture was heated
at reflux for 1.5 h, solvent was removed in vacuo. Another 10 mL of benzene
was added and distilled off again. The residue was dissolved in a small volume
of benzene for the next step. The resulting ethacrynic chloride solution was
added dropwise to a solution of 1 mmol of amine in pyridine (10 mL) at 0 °C
with stirring. The reaction was stirred at ambient temperature for 3 h, the
solvent was distilled off in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate,
and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography
(dichloromethane:methanol from 100:0 to 100:5) to obtain the pure EA
amides shown in Table 1.
Acknowledgments
We thank Michael Rosenbach, Haowen Zhou, Michael Chan, for
the technical assistance, and Nancy Noon for secretarial support.
This work was supported in part by the Leukemia and Lymphoma
Society SCOR grant, and Grants CA81534 and CA113318, both from
the National Institutes of Health.
20. Selected data for compound 4: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 9.23 (br, 1H), 7.89 (d,
J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H),
6.20 (br, 1H), 5.98 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (d, J = 12 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (d, J = 12 Hz, 1H),
2.77 (s, 2H), 2.44 (q, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.17 (t, J = 8 Hz, 3H). MS (ESI) m/z: 422,
[M+H]+.
Supplementary data
21. Selected data for compound 6: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 9.47 (br, 1H), 8.03 (d,
J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H),
5.98 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (s, 2H), 2.90 (br, 1H), 2.45 (q,
J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.17 (t, J = 8 Hz, 3H). MS (ESI) m/z: 423, [M+H]+.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
22. Selected data for compound 37: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 9.30 (br, 1H), 8.57
(s, 1H), 8.40 (s, 1H), 7.95(d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8 Hz,
1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 8Hz, 1H), 5.99 (s,
1H), 5.63 (s, 1H), 4.83 (s, 2H), 2.60 (br, 1H), 2.48 (q, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.17 (t,
J = 8 HZ, 3H). MS (ESI) m/z: 473, [M+H]+.
References and notes
1. Caligaris-Cappio, F.; Hamblin, T. J. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999, 17, 399.
2. Peifer, M.; Polakis, P. Science 2000, 287, 1606.
3. Polakis, P. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1837.
4. Rosenwald, A.; Alizadeh, A. A.; Widhopf, G.; Simon, R.; Davis, R. E.; Yu, X.; Yang,
L.; Pickeral, O. K.; Rassenti, L. Z.; Powell, J.; Botstein, D.; Byrd, J. C.; Grever, M. R.;
Cheson, B. D.; Chiorazzi, N.; Wilson, W. H.; Kipps, T. J.; Brown, P. O.; Staudt, L.
M. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 1639.
23. Selected data for compound 40: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 10.70 (br, 1H),
10.38 (br, 1H), 9.00 (br, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.32
(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 6.33 (s, 1H), 6.06 (s, 1H),
5.56 (s, 1H), 4.97 (s, 2H), 2.36 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.07 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). MS (ESI)
m/z: 463, [M+H]+.