material) with CSA in methanol. Selective DCC-mediated
acylation with 4-nonone-8-enoic acid22 of the primary O-6′′
alcohol (17f18, 85%, Scheme 4) gave the precursor to ring-
closing metathesis. RCM proceeded best23 with 15 mol %
of Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst24 added portion-wise in 1,2-
dichloroethane (45 °C for 3 h at 0.05 M dilution) to provide
19 in 84% yield as a mixture of isomers that were not
separated but were directly subjected to hydrogenation (H2,
Pd/C, EtOAc-EtOH) to first saturate the mixture of olefins
(as shown by TLC, silica, 30% EtOAc-hexanes) and then
reductively cleave the O-3′ benzyl group to deliver 20.
Selective chloroacetylation of the O-3′ hydroxyl group then
gave 21 (Scheme 4).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Fucoside Acceptor 15
The TBS group at O-3′′ hindered the O-4″ hydroxyl to a
greater extent than initially anticipated, and the cinnamoyl
group could only be installed by heating a DCC-mediated
coupling reaction in 1,2-dichloroethane under evaporative
conditions. After several iterations of solvent evaporation
and replacement, a 62% yield of 22 was obtained (75% based
on recovered starting material). A high-yielding removal of
the TBS group was effected with SiF425 to give an 84% yield
of alcohol 23 (Scheme 5). Tigloylation (tiglic acid, DCC,
4-DMAP, 4-DMAP·HCl) gave the fully blocked precursor
to ipomoeassin F 24, and removal of the R-chloroacetates
by employing an excess of DABCO in hot ethanol26
furnished the natural product ipomoeassin F (1f) in 39% yield
after purification by flash chromatography and HPLC.
The synthetic material obtained was identical to a natural
sample of ipomoeassin F kindly provided by Professor
give 10 as a single isomer in 64% yield (Scheme 3). Global
deacetylation furnished triol 11, and stannylidene-mediated
equatorial benzylation20 brought the sequence as far as 12.
Selective silylation (TBSCl, imidazole, DMF) of the equato-
rial hydroxyl group21 gave 13 in 78% yield. Acetylation then
delivered 14, and the sequence was completed by acid-
mediated deprotection of the TBS group to produce 15 in
85% yield over two steps along with 8% of diol 12.
Optimized coupling conditions called for the use of a 1.5:1
ratio of 7 and 15 and 0.5 equiv of boron trifluoride etherate to
furnish a 52% yield (87% based on recovered starting material)
of the target ꢀ-disaccharide 16 along with 17, the product in
which the acetonide was lost in 21% yield (Scheme 4).
(11) Fu¨rstner, A.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1906–1907.
(12) In fact, Fu¨rstner was the first to employ a RCM approach to these
types of compounds, see: (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Muller, T. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 424–425. (b) Fu¨rstner, A.; Muller, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
7814–7821. (c) Fu¨rstner, A.; Jeanjean, F.; Razon, P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 2097–2101.
Scheme 4. Disaccharide Coupling and Macrocycle Formation
(13) RajanBabu, T. V. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3642–3644.
(14) Crich, D.; Lim, L. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 9, 2209–
2214.
(15) All new compounds were fully characterized by 1H, 13C, and COSY
NMR, high-resolution mass spectroscopy, FT-IR, and optical rotation. HPLC
and GC methods were employed when deemed appropriate.
(16) Fu¨rstner, A.; Jeanjean, F.; Razon, P.; Wirtz, C.; Mynott, R.
Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 307–319.
(17) Schmidt, R. R.; Kinzy, W. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1994,
50, 21–123.
(18) Adelhorst, K.; Whitesides, G. M. Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 242, 69–
76.
(19) Chiral alcohol 9 was prepared in >99% ee by addition of a vinyl
cuprate to optically pure 1,2-epoxyheptane. The latter was readily available
through the use of Jacobsen chiral epoxidation technology: Schaus, S. E.;
Brandes, B. D.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga, M.; Hansen, K. B.; Gould, A. E.;
Furrow, M. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1307–1315.
(20) See, for example: Kanie, O.; Takeda, T.; Ogihara, Y. Carbohydr.
Res. 1989, 190, 53–64.
(21) Corey, E. J.; Venkateswarlu, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6190–
6191.
(22) The γ-keto-acid was prepared by copper-mediated addition of the
Grignard reagent derived from 5-bromo-1-pentene to succinic anhydride,
see: L’hommet, G.; Freville, S.; Thuy, V.; Petit, H.; Celerier, J. P. Synth.
Commun. 1996, 26, 3897–3901.
(23) In a closely related system, it was found that both the first- and
second-generation Grubbs catalysts mediated the ring closure, but catalyst
loadings of up to 50 and 35 mol %, respectively, were needed to push the
reactions to completion making purification somewhat problematic.
(24) Kingsbury, J. S.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J.; Hoveyda,
A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 791–799.
(25) Corey, E. J.; Yi, K. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2289–2290.
(26) Lefeber, D. J.; Kamerling, J. P.; Vliegenthart, J. F. G. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 701–703.
To complete the conversion of 16 to 17, the acetonide was
removed in 43% yield (67% based on recovered starting
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009
1419