two diasteroisomers9 cis-3a and trans-3a were formed over
the four possible isomers and were isolated with a good 80%
yield.10 A trans selectivity was observed (trans-3a:cis-3a 68:
32), albeit with a low enantioselectivity (ee(trans-3a):23%)
for the major trans-3a isomer. We then studied the influence
of different parameters. The most representative results are
summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Asymmetric Copper-Catalyzed Reductive-Aldol
Cyclization of Substrate 2a-c Catalyzed by CuF(PPh3)3•2MeOH
1/L*a
When the (S)-MeO-BIPHEP ligand L1 was used at -50
°C, we observed a significant improvement of the enanti-
oselection of the trans isomer with a slight increase of the
cis:trans ratio (Table 1, entries 2 versus 1). We then screened
entry
2
L* temp (°C) cis-3:trans-3b ee(cis-3)/ee(trans-3) (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2a L1
2a L1
2a L2
2a L2
2a L3
2a L4
2b L3
2c L2
2c L3
25
-50
25
32:68
24:76
57:43
68:32
82:18
73:27
72:28
100:0
100:0
100:0
100:0
14/23
35/70
82/47
89/63
92/33
-91/-72
84/60
86
(3) For reviews on reductive-aldol reactions see: (a) Chiu, P. Synthesis
2004, 2210-2215. (b) Nishiyama, H.; Shiomi, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007,
279, 105–137. Selected references: for intermolecular reductive-aldol
reaction [Rh]: (c) Taylor, S. J.; Morken, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
12202–12203. (d) Taylor, S. J.; Duffey, M. O.; Morken, J. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 4528–4529. (e) Nishiyama, H.; Shiomi, T.; Tsuchiya, Y.;
Matsuda, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6972–6973. (f) Jang, H.-Y.;
Huddleston, R. R.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15156–
15157. (g) Jung, C. K.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 17051–
17056. (h) Bee, C.; Han, S. B.; Hassan, A.; Lida, H.; Krische, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2746–2747[Ir]: (i) Zhao, C. X.; Duffey, M. O.;
Taylor, S. J.; Morken, J. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1829–1831[Co]: (j) Lumby,
R. J. R.; Joensuu, P. M.; Lam, H. W. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4367–4370. For
intramolecular reductive-aldol reaction [Rh]: (k) Krische, M. J. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 3953–3958. (l) Jang, H. Y.; rische, M. J. Acc. Chem. Res.
2004, 37, 653–661. (m) Bocknack, B. M.; Wang, L.-C.; Krische, M. J.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5421–5424[Co]: (n) Baik, T.-G.;
Luis, A. L.; Wang, L.-C.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
5112–5113. (o) Wang, L.-C.; Jang, H.-Y.; Roh, Y.; Lynch, V.; Schultz,
A. J.; Wang, X.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9448–9453.
(p) Lam, H. W.; Joensuu, P. M.; Murray, G. J.; Fordyce, E. A. F.; Prieto,
O.; Luebbers, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3729–3732[Cu]: (q) Chiu, P.; Chen,
B.; Cheng, K. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9229–9232. (r) Chiu, P.; Szeto,
C. P.; Geng, Z.; Cheng, K. F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1901–1903. (s) Chiu, P.;
Szeto, C. P.; Geng, Z.; Cheng, K. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4091–
4093. (t) Chiu, P.; Leung, S. K. Chem. Comm. 2004, 2308–2309. (u) Chung,
W. K.; Chiu, P. Synlett 2005, 55–58. (v) Agapiou, K.; Cauble, D. F.; Krische,
M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4528–4529. (w) Lam, H. W.; Joensuu,
P. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4225–4228. (x) Lam, H. W.; Murray, G. J.; Firth,
J. D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5743–5746. When the preparation of this manuscript
Lipshutz reported an enantioselective reductive-aldol reaction for the
construction of cyclic compound: (y) Lipshutz, B. H.; Amorelli, B.; Unger,
J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14378–14379, All references about
reductive aldol reaction are summarized in the Supporting Information.
(4) (a) Deschamp, J.; Chuzel, O.; Hannedouche, J.; Riant, O. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1292–1297. In the same time, Shibasaki reported
a similar catalytic system with low to moderate selectivities: (b) Zhao, D. B.;
Oisaki, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1403–
1407. For studies on the influence of the TaniaPhos structure see: (c) Zhao,
D.; Oisaki, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
14440–14441. For catalytic asymmetric reductive-aldol of allenic esters to
ketones see: (d) Oisaki, K.; Zhao, D.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7164–7165.
-50
-50
-50
-50
-50
-50
-50
-50
95
-86
-95
10 2c L4
11 2c L5
a Reactions were carried out in a 0.1 M solution in toluene at the
indicated temperature under an oxygen free argon-atmosphere in presence
of 2a-c (1 mmol), CuF(PPh3)3•2MeOH 1 (1 mol %), chiral ligand L* (1
mol %) and phenylsilane (1.4 equiv) for 2 h. b cis:trans ratio and
enantiomeric excesses were determined by chiral GC analysis; see Sup-
porting Information for details.
a wide range of chiral diphosphane ligands and found that
the TaniaPhos ligands L2-L5 gave the best selectivities,
without any loss of the excellent reactivity of the catalytic
system (Figure 1).11 Although a low cis:trans selectivity was
Figure 1. MeO-BIPHEP Ligand and TaniaPhos-type Ligands.
(5) Chuzel, O.; Deschamp, J.; Chausteur, C.; Riant, O. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 5943–5946.
(6) (a) Muka¨ıyama, T.; Banno, K.; Narasaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 7503–7509. (b) Oisaki, K.; Suto, Y.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5644–5645.
observed at room temperature, a promising ee of 82% was
reached for the cis isomer with the TaniaPhos ligand L2
(Table 1, entry 3). A slight enhancement of the cis:trans ratio
and the enantioselectivity was again observed when the
reaction was carried out at -50 °C (Table 1, entry 4), and
this temperature was then kept for further optimizations.
Increasing the steric bulkiness around the phosphorus atom
with the ligand L3 gave further improvement of both cis:
trans ratio to 82:18 and an excellent enantioselectivity of
92% for the major cis-3a isomer (Table 1, entry 5). We also
noticed a similar enantioselectivity with the hydroxy ana-
logue TaniaPhos L4 (Table 1, entry 6 versus 5).
(7) CuF(PPh3)3•2MeOH was prepared according to a literature procedure:
Gulliver, D. J.; Levason, W.; Webster, M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1981, 52,
153–159.
(8) The diketo-ester 2a is easily prepared in two-steps, starting from
the commercially available 2-methyl-1,3-cyclohexanedione. (a) Huddleston,
R. R.; Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1143–1146. (b) Thiemann, T.;
Umeno, K.; Wang, J.; Tabuchi, Y.; Arima, K.; Watanabe, M.; Tanaka, Y.;
Gorohmaru, H.; Mataka, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2090–
2110.
(9) Cis and trans nomenclature referred to the relation of the different
substituents on the bicyclic junction.
(10) The relative configuration were determined by NOE experiments
on each pure isolated isomers, see Supporting Information for details. The
absolute configuration are determined on the dehydrated compound 6b by
comparison of the optical rotation value of the latter with the reported value
[R]20 -85.6 (c ) 3.4 in CHCl3) and -140 (c ) 2.1 in CHCl3) the
configuration is S. Yamazaki, J.; Bedekar, A. V.; Watanabe, T.; Tanaka,
K.; Watanabe, J.; Fuji, K. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2002, 13, 729–734.
(11) Ferrocenyl ligands like JosiPhos, WalPhos and MandyPhos were
also tested but gave low selectivities.
1218
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009