FULL PAPER
deleterious effect of water in the process. Inspired by
our previous work,[13] TfOH and BF3 ·Et2O were chose
as the catalysts, unfortunately, they were completely
ineffective in the present reaction (entries 3–4). Then
we screened other commercially available Lewis acids,
and found Y(OTf)3 was most beneficial for the
reaction, resulting in 98% yield (entry 10). Next, a
solvent screen revealed DCM to be optimal, and
decreasing the concentration of the reaction resulted in
a yield of 94% (entry 13) (See Table S1 in SI for more
details). We next studied this reaction with different
loadings of Y(OTf)3 under the optimal reaction
conditions and found that the load could be reduced to
5 mol% without any remarkable effect on the yield of
3A (entry 14). To our surprise, when 2a was reduced
to 0.4 equiv., the desired product 3A was also obtained
in 92% yield (entry 15), which indicated that our
approach featured excellent atom-economy compared
with the previous Werz’s[18] and Liu’s[19] work. After
the investigation of other reaction parameters, we
established the optimized reaction conditions as 1a
(0.05 mmol), 2a (0.02 mmol), Y(OTf)3 (5 mol%), 4 Å
Table 2. Substrate scope of [3+2] cycloaddition of donor-
acceptor aziridines with 1,3,5-triazinanes.[a,b]
°
MS (25 mg), DCM (0.5 mL), at 30 C for 12 h.
We explored the scope and limitations of the
reaction by using various donor-acceptor aziridines
and 1,3,5-triazinanes under the optimized reaction
conditions, and the results are summarized in Table 2.
All the donor-acceptor aziridines and 1,3,5-triazinanes
underwent the cycloaddition smoothly to give the
corresponding products in excellent yields. Imidazoli-
dines 3A–3K bearing electronically neutral or elec-
tron-rich groups at the ortho, meta or para position of
the aryl ring were obtained in good yields. Particularly
noteworthy is that alkynyl substituents 1h and 1i were
well-tolerated, which is significant since aryl alkynyl
groups are usually incompatible with Lewis acid-
catalyzed cycloaddition of donor-acceptor aziridine
systems.[9] The structure of 3I was unambiguously
confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (Fig-
ure S1 in SI).[20] Meanwhile, variation on the substitu-
tion of the arylsulfonyl group also furnished the
[a] Reactions were conducted on 0.2 mmol scale.
[b] Isolated yield based on 1 is given.
corresponding products in moderate yields. 1l–1n providing the corresponding products 3AA–3AC in
bearing electron-withdrawing groups and electron- 66%–71% yield.
donating groups of the aryl ring participated in the
To further demonstrate the utility and practicality of
reaction well to provide 3L–3N respectively. Addition- this protocol, this [3+2] cycloaddition was conducted
ally, for the ester moieties, the reactions of aziridines on gram-scale. The reaction of 1a with 2g could be
1o–1q also worked very well under standard con- easily run on the gram scale in a good yield of 98%
ditions to give the corresponding products in moderate (Scheme 3a). On the other hand, the removal of the
yields, indicating the ester group does not affect the benzenesulfonyl group and elimination of the acetoxy
reaction. Furthermore, various 1,3,5-triazinanes also group of 3W were carried out to afford the imidazoline
engaged in efficient cycloaddition, and high yields derivative 4 (Scheme 3b),[21] which is a scaffold of
were observed for substrates bearing electron-with- biologically active compound[2b–d] (Scheme 1).
drawing/donating groups at the para, ortho or meta
To obtain some insights into the reaction mecha-
position of the phenyl ring to afford products 3R–3Z. nism, we explored the stereospecificity of the reaction
Additionally, it is noteworthy that this transformation using enantioenriched DÀ A aziridine (R)-1a (97%
was also applicable to the substituted 1,3,5-triazinanes ee).[18] Indeed, the corresponding racemic product 3A
bearing pyridinyl, methyl and cyclopropyl group, was obtained with 3% ee, which indicated that the
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 1–7
3
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
��
These are not the final page numbers!