I. Cikotiene et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 1089–1092
1091
Hsp90 protein target and potent inhibitors of cancer cell survival
and growth. A simple novel route has been employed for the com-
pound synthesis.
References and notes
1. Wandinger, S. K.; Richter, K.; Buchner, J. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 18473.
2. Maloney, A.; Workman, P. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2002, 2, 3.
3. Isaacs, J. S.; Xu, W.; Neckers, L. Cancer Cell 2003, 3, 213.
4. Richter, K.; Buchner, J. J. Cell. Physiol. 2001, 188, 281.
5. Goetz, M. P.; Toft, D. O.; Ames, M. M.; Erlichman, C. Ann. Oncol. 2003, 14, 1169.
6. Wegele, H.; Muller, L.; Buchner, J. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 151, 1.
7. Bagatell, R.; Whitesell, L. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004, 3, 1021.
8. Roe, S. M.; Prodromou, C.; O_Brien, R.; Ladbury, J. E.; Piper, P. W.; Pearl, L. H. J.
Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 260.
9. (a) Kelland, L. R.; Sharp, S. Y.; Rogers, P. M.; Myers, T. G.; Workman, P. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 1999, 91, 1940; (b) Solit, D. B.; Zheng, F. F.; Drobnjak, M.; Münster,
P. N.; Higgins, B.; Verbel, D.; Heller, G.; Tong, W.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Agus, D. B.;
Scher, H. I.; Rosen, N. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 8, 986; (c) Burger, A. M.; Fiebig, H.-
H.; Stinson, S. F.; Sausville, E. A. Anticancer Drugs 2004, 15, 377.
Figure 4. Normalized U2OS cancer cell line survival as a function of compound 3b,
3e, and 5 concentration.
10. (a) Banerji, U.; Clarke, P.; Walton, M.; O_Donnell, A.; Raynaud, F.; Turner, A.;
Judson, I.; Workman, P. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2003, 44, 587; (b) Sausville,
E. A.; Tomaszewski, J. E.; Ivy, P. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2003, 3, 377; (c)
Banerji, U.; Judson, I.; Workman, P. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2003, 3, 385; (d)
Goetz, M. P.; Toft, D.; Reid, J.; Ames, M.; Stensgard, B.; Safgren, S.; Adjei, A. A.;
Sloan, J.; Atherton, P.; Vasile, V.; Salazaar, S.; Adjei, A.; Croghan, G.; Erlichman,
C. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 1078; (e) Grem, J. L.; Morrison, G.; Guo, X.-D.; Agnew,
E.; Takimoto, C. H.; Thomas, R.; Szabo, E.; Grochow, L.; Grollman, F.; Hamilton,
J. M.; Neckers, L.; Wilson, R. H. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 1885.
11. Dymock, B. W.; Drysdale, M. J.; McDonald, E.; Workman, P. Expert Opin. Ther.
Patents 2004, 14, 837. 20.
12. Chiosis, G.; Vilenchik, M.; Kim, J.; Solit, D. Drug Discov. Today 2004, 9, 881.
13. Schulte, T. W.; Akinaga, S.; Soga, S.; Sullivan, W.; Stensgard, B.; Toft, D.;
Neckers, L. M. Cell Stress Chaperones 1998, 3, 100.
Table 1
Dissociation constants of compounds 3a–e, 4, and
constructs (Hsp90N and Hsp90F) as determined by ITC at 37 °C
5 binding to both protein
Compound
Hsp90N Kd
l
M
Hsp90F Kd lM
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
4
0.013
0.0063
0.017
0.034
0.042
>20
0.0075
0.0048
0.011
0.039
0.037
>20
14. (a) Soga, S.; Neckers, L. M.; Schulte, T. W.; Shiotsu, Y.; Akasaka, K.; Narumi, H.;
Agatsuma, T.; Ikuina, Y.; Murakata, C.; Tamaoki, T.; Akinaga, S. Cancer Res. 1999,
59, 2931; (b) Soga, S.; Shiotsu, Y.; Akinaga, S.; Sharma, S. V. Curr. Cancer Drug
Targets 2003, 3, 359; (c) Barluenga, S.; Wang, C.; Fontaine, J. G.; Aouadi, K.;
Beebe, K.; Tsutsumi, S.; Neckers, L.; Winssinger, N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 4432.
5
>20
0.20
>20
0.24
17-AAG
Values are means of multiple experiments.
15. (a) Chiosis, G.; Merna, N. T.; Lucas, B.; Munster, P. N.; Zheng, F. F.; Sepp-
Lorenzino, L.; Rosen, N. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 289; (b) Chiosis, G.; Lucas, B.; Shtil,
A.; Huezo, H.; Rosen, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3555; (c) Llauger, L.; He,
H.; Kim, J.; Aguirre, J.; Rosen, N.; Peters, U.; Davies, P.; Chiosis, G. J. Med. Chem.
2005, 48, 2892; (d) Wright, L.; Barril, X.; Dymock, B.; Sheridan, L.; Surgenor, A.;
Beswick, M.; Drysdale, M.; Collier, A.; Massey, A.; Davies, N.; Fink, A.; Fromont,
C.; Aherne, W.; Boxall, K.; Sharp, S.; Workman, P.; Hubbard, R. E. Chem. Biol.
2004, 11, 775; (e) Dymock, B.; Barril, X.; Beswick, M.; Collier, A.; Davies, N.;
Drysdale, M.; Fink, A.; Fromont, C.; Hubbard, R. E.; Massey, A.; Surgenor, A.;
Wright, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 325.
16. (a) Marcu, M. G.; Chadli, A.; Bouhouche, I.; Catelli, M.; Neckers, L. M. J. Biol.
Chem. 2000, 275, 37181; (b) Itoh, H.; Ogura, M.; Komatsudo, A.; Wakui, H.;
Miura, A. B.; Tashima, Y. Biochem. J. 1999, 343, 697; (c) Marcu, M. G.; Neckers, L.
M. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2003, 3, 343.
17. (a) Cheung, K. M. J.; Matthews, T. P.; James, K.; Rowlands, M. G.; Boxall, K. J.;
Sharp, S. Y.; Maloney, A.; Roe, S. M.; Prodromou, C.; Pearl, L. H.; Aherne, G. W.;
McDonald, E.; Workman, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 3338; (b)
Dymock, B. W.; Barril, X.; Brough, P. A.; Cansfield, J. E.; Massey, A.; McDonald,
E.; Hubbard, R. E.; Surgenor, A.; Roughley, S. D.; Webb, P.; Workman, P.;
Wright, L.; Drysdale, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4212.
18. (a) Brough, P. A.; Aherne, W.; Barril, X.; Borgognoni, J.; Boxall, K.; Cansfield, J. E.;
Cheung, K.-M.; Collins, I.; Davies, N. G. M.; Drysdale, M. J.; Dymock, B.; Eccles, S.
A.; Finch, H.; Fink, A.; Hayes, A.; Howes, R.; Hubbard, R. E.; James, K.; Jordan, A.
M.; Lockie, A.; Martins, V.; Massey, A.; Matthews, T.; McDonald, E.; Northfield,
C. J.; Pearl, L. H.; Prodromou, C.; Ray, S.; Raynaud, F. I.; Roughley, S. D.; Sharp, S.
Y.; Surgenor, A. D.; Walmsley, L.; Webb, P.; Wood, M.; Workman, P.; Wright, L.
J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 196; (b) Gopalsamy, A.; Shi, M.; Golas, J.; Vogan, E.;
Jacob, J.; Johnson, M.; Lee, F.; Nilakantan, R.; Petersen, R.; Svenson, K.; Chopra,
R.; Tam, M. S.; Wen, Y.; Ellingboe, J.; Arndt, K.; Boschelli, F. J. Med. Chem. 2008,
51, 373.
in position 3 of the dihydroxyphenyl moiety practically did not bind
to Hsp90. These compounds could not form the extensive H-bond-
ing network involving both resorcinol hydroxyls due to the chloro-
substituent, resulting in the lack of activity.19
The dissociation constants of compounds 3a–e, 4, and 5 with
both protein constructs, obtained at 37 °C, are listed in Table 1.
Compound effect on cancer cells was tested by determining cell
growth, death and survival as a function of compound concentra-
tion for two selected cancer cell lines, U2OS (osteosarcoma) and
HeLa (cervical carcinoma)27, using tetrazolium/formazan assay.28
The strongest inhibitor of cancer cell growth was compound 3e
with the observed GI50 of 0.69 lM for U2OS cells and 0.70 lM for
HeLa cells (Table 2, Fig. 4). Compound 5 was a relatively weak
inhibitor of cancer cell lines. This property correlates well with
its weak binding to Hsp90 (Table 2). Other compounds exhibited
average potency of cancer cell growth inhibition. The compound
series has potential to become candidates for therapeutic antican-
cer treatment.
In conclusion, a new group of compounds, similar to previously
described diaryl pyrazoles19, was shown to be effective binders of
19. Sharp, S. Y.; Boxall, K.; Rowlands, M.; Prodromou, C.; Roe, S. M.; Maloney, A.;
Powers, M.; Clarke, P. A.; Box, G.; Sanderson, S.; Patterson, L.; Matthews, T. P.;
Cheung, K. M. J.; Ball, K.; Hayes, A.; Raynaud, F.; Marais, R.; Pearl, L.; Eccles, S.;
Aherne, W.; McDonald, E.; Workman, P. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 2206.
20. (a) Solit, D. B.; Chiosis, G. Drug Discov. Today 2008, 38; (b) Messaoudi, S.; Peyrat,
J. F.; Brion, J. D.; Alami, M. Anticanc. Agents Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 761.
21. General procedure for the preparation of 2-aryl-1-(5-substituted-2,4-dihydroxy-
phenyl)ethanone hydrazones (2a–e). Hydrazine hydrate (0.166 ml, 3.42 mmol)
Table 2
U2OS and HeLa cancer cell line survival (growth inhibition, GI50) by compounds
3a–e, 5
Compound
U2OS, GI50
,
lM
HeLa, GI50, lM
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
5
6.0
6.9
7.1
9.9
0.69
28
2.5
3.6
3.3
4.2
0.70
19
is added to
a solution of the corresponding 2-aryl-1-(5-substituted-2,4-
dihydroxyphenyl)ethanone 1a–e (1.71 mmol) in 95% ethanol (5 ml). The
mixture is heated under reflux for 7 h. Solvent is concentrated in vacuo, the
residue treated with water, filtered of and recrystallyzed from 2-propanol.
Spectral data for the selected compound: 1-(5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
2-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-ethanone hydrazone (2b). Yield 97%, yellow solid, mp
Values are means of multiple experiments.