a fiber diameter of B60–90 nm (Fig. 2e). Moreover at fixed
gelator concentration the fibers became more tightly packed with
increase in the amount of f-SWNTs from 0.005 to 0.03% w/v
(Fig. 2f). The TEM image of f-SWNT–5 hybrid gel also revealed
interconnected SAFIN (Fig. 3d) in the presence of CNTs.
The involvement of f-SWNTs in self-assembled gelation
through p–p interaction was further probed from the lumines-
cence spectra of 1 and 5. The concentrations of gelator and
f-SWNT were sequentially varied to determine their individual
influence on gelation. Upon excitation at 280 nm, the emission
intensity of the indole moiety at 340 nm was initially found to
increase with the gelator/nanotube up to a threshold concen-
tration and then gradually decreased with broadening of the
peak (Fig. S2–S5, ESIw).3,5,7 The emission intensity increased
till the gelators were in the non-self-assembled state and
followed by quenching at concentrations higher than 0.025
and 0.01% w/v for 1 and 5, respectively, as the planar
aromatic rings of amphiphiles and CNT backbone get closer
to each other due to the initiation of self-assembly. This
quenching effect was more prominent when the concentration
of f-SWNT was increased keeping the gelator amount fixed
(0.3 and 0.1% w/v for 1 and 5, respectively). This fluorescence
quenching was observed at a very low concentration of
f-SWNT (0.0025 and 0.005% w/v for 1 and 5, respectively),
which strongly suggests the integration of the f-SWNT
(a fluorescent quencher) with the aromatic ring of the gelator
through p–p interaction.3
Fig. 4 Plot of G/ and G// of the f-SWNT (0.1% w/v)–1 composite as a
function of angular frequency (0.01%) at varying gelator amounts
(0.5–5% w/v).
more rigid composite (Fig. S11, ESIw). Analogous increase in G/
was observed for 5 at varying f-SWNT amounts (Fig. S12, ESIw).
This result clearly shows that f-SWNTs not only improved
the gelation ability but also enhanced mechanical strength of
hybrids through matching integration of f-SWNTs within the
self-assembled network.
In conclusion, an extremely low amount of f-SWNTs can
remarkably influence the self-assembled gelation by instigating
the formation of interconnecting SAFIN resulting in super-
efficient mechanically strong gels.
We are grateful to DST, India, for financial assistance and
CSIR for fellowships to SKM, TK and DD.
All the f-SWNT–organogel hybrids were thermoreversible.
The gel-to-sol transition temperatures (Tgel) increased with
gelator concentration (1, 4, and 5, Fig. S6, ESIw) in the presence
of 0.1% w/v f-SWNTs. Prominent endothermic peaks for
f-SWNT–1 gel (1.0% w/v 1 and 0.1% w/v f-SWNT) at 73.6 1C
(Fig. S7, ESIw) and for f-SWNT–5 gel (0.75% w/v 5 and
0.1% w/v f-SWNT) at 77.4 1C (Fig. S8, ESIw) in differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) were comparable to that of visually
observed Tgel at 71 1C and 79 1C, respectively.7 Importantly, at
fixed concentration of the gelator (0.7% w/v), Tgel steadily
improved even with small increase in f-SWNTs (Fig. S9, ESIw).
Such prominent increase in Tgel indicates the physical reinforcing
of the self-assembled gel network with f-SWNTs.
Notes and references
1 P. M. Ajayan, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 1787; A. Hirsch, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1853; C. Backes, C. D. Schmidt, K. Rosenlehner,
F. Hauke, J. N. Coleman and A. Hirsch, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 788;
T. Fukushima, A. Kosaka, Y. Ishimura, T. Yamamoto,
T. Tikagawa, N. Ishii and T. Aida, Science, 2003, 300, 2072;
S. Srinivasan, V. K. Praveen, R. Philip and A. Ajayaghosh, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 5675.
2 P. M. Ajayan, L. S. Schadler, C. Giannaris and A. Rubio, Adv.
Mater., 2000, 12, 750.
3 A. Pal, B. S. Chhikara, A. Govindaraj, S. Bhattacharya and C. N. R.
Rao, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 2593; S. Srinivasan, S. S. Babu,
V. K. Praveen and A. Ajayaghosh, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 5746; S. K. Samanta, A. Pal, S. Bhattacharya and C. N. R.
Rao, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 6881; A. Kumar, P. K. Vemula,
P. M. Ajayan and G. John, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 236;
M. Moniruzzaman, A. Sahin and K. I. Winey, Carbon, 2009, 47, 645.
4 A. M. Bieser and J. C. Tiller, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 13180;
A. M. Bieser and J. C. Tiller, Supramol. Chem., 2008, 20, 363;
S. R. Jadav, P. K. Vemula, R. Kumar, S. R. Raghavan and G. John,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 7695.
5 A. K. Das, R. Collins and R. V. Ulijn, Small, 2008, 4, 279;
S. R. Jadhav, B. S. Chiou, D. F. Wood, G. D. Hoffman,
G. M. Glenn and G. John, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 864.
6 S. Brahmachari, D. Das and P. K. Das, Chem. Commun., 2010,
46, 8386; S. Brahmachari, D. Das, A. Shome and P. K. Das, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 11243.
Thus, the mechanical strength of the f-SWNT–gel compo-
sites was investigated by rheological studies.9 For gelator 1
alone, though the storage modulus (G/) was higher than the
loss modulus (G//) over the entire angular frequency range
(0.1–200 rad sÀ1) at a fixed strain of 0.01%, the signals were
noisy because of poor strength of the organogel (Fig. S10,
ESIw).3 Interestingly in the presence of 0.1% w/v f-SWNTs at
0.5% w/v of 1 (10 fold lower than its MGC), both G/ and G//
(G/ > G//) showed a plateau region under the same experi-
mental conditions which is a characteristic feature of viscoelastic
materials (Fig. 4).9 At fixed f-SWNT (0.1% w/v) almost B3
fold increase in G/ (450 Pa) was observed when gelator concen-
tration was increased to 1% w/v, which further increased to
600 Pa at 3% w/v of 1. Most strikingly the G/ of the f-SWNT–1
composite was found to be B6 fold higher (B25 000 Pa) than
that of the gel (1) alone at 5% w/v (Fig. 4 and Fig. S10, ESIw).
Such notable increase in G/ indicates the mechanical reinforce-
ment of the f-SWNT–gel composite. The G/ also enhanced with
inclusion of higher f-SWNT (0.05 and 0.1% w/v) resulting in a
7 T. Kar, S. Debnath, D. Das, A. Shome and P. K. Das, Langmuir,
2009, 25, 8639; S. Dutta, D. Das, A. Dasgupta and P. K. Das,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 1493.
8 B. G. Cousins, A. K. Das, R. Sharma, Y. Li, J. P. McNamara,
I. H. Hillier, I. A. Kinloch and R. V. Ulijn, Small, 2009, 5, 587;
C. Backes, C. D. Schmidt, F. Hauke, C. Bottcher and A. Hirsch,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 2172; Y. Li, B. G. Cousins,
R. V. Ulijn and I. A. Kinloch, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 11760.
9 S. Bhattacharya, A. Srivastava and A. Pal, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 2934; T. Kar, S. Dutta and P. K. Das, Soft Matter, 2010,
6, 4777.
c
1816 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1814–1816
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012