Rh-Catalyzed Hydroiminoacylation of Alkenes
Organometallics, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2009 2977
Scheme 1. Intermolecular Hydroacylation Reaction
following classical steps: the oxidative addition of the aldimine,
followed by the coordination and insertion of the alkene into
the Rh-H bond of the catalyst, and the reductive elimination
of the product and the regeneration of the starting Rh species.22
In the context of the work carried out in our laboratory on
the Rh-catalyzed hydroiminoacylation of alkenes, the catalytic
results revealed a strong difference between the activity of
neutral and cationic catalysts in the one-pot 2-picoline-assisted
intermolecular hydroacylation. Here, we report these catalytic
results and a comparative mechanistic study of the intermo-
lecular hydroiminoacylation of alkenes with the aldimine 3
between neutral and cationic rhodium systems using in situ
NMR techniques and computational DFT-based methods.
methods, in which both the aldehyde and the alkene coordinate
to the rhodium center in a bidentate manner, and alkene
chelation involving an amide group have also been successfully
developed.13 The use of anhydrides as acylating reagents14 or
[RhCp*]15 catalysts does not require chelation assistance.
Suggs showed that 2-amino-picoline-derived aldimines react
with alkenes in the presence of [RhCl(PPh3)3] to give
ketimines.16 Jung developed a one-pot intermolecular hydroa-
cylation procedure that forms in situ the 2-amino-picoline
aldimine derivative, which reacts with an alkene in the presence
of Wilkinson’s catalyst to yield a ketimine.17 Later, the ketimine
is hydrolyzed within the reaction media to provide the ke-
tone (Scheme 2). This procedure avoids the use of a coordinating
atom that is permanently bound to the substrate. This method
was also successfully applied in the hydroacylation of alkynes.18
The mechanism of the intramolecular hydroacylation reaction
has already been studied using both neutral2,19 and cationic
precursors.2e The rate-limiting step of this reaction is the
reductive elimination of the product. Recently, a detailed
computational study provided additional insights into this
mechanism.20 In contrast, the mechanism of intermolecular
hydroacylation has been much less studied but is thought to be
similar to that of the intramolecular version.6-13 When the
reaction was studied using deuterated benzaldehyde and eth-
ene pressure, deuterium in the organic product was found in
the methyl and methylene groups in a ratio of 3:2, indicating
that the alkene insertion was a reversible process.6 In another
study, reductive elimination was proposed to be the rate-
determining step, with other steps of the catalytic cycle described
as reversible processes.2e,21
Results and Discussion
Catalysis. In the course of a study of the one-pot 2-picoline-
assisted intramolecular hydroacylation of alkenes23 and
alkynes,24 the use of Montmorillonite K-10 (MK-10) as a
reusable acid catalyst able to catalyze the imine formation and
ketimine hydrolysis (see first and last steps in Scheme 2), was
previously explored. Furthermore, MK-10 can also be used as
a solid support for immobilizing and recovering the catalyst,
and for this purpose, cationic complexes are required.25 We
therefore studied a series of cationic precursors of the formula
[Rh(cod)(L)2]BF4, where L corresponds to phosphine and
phosphite ligands, in the presence of 2-amino-3-picoline and
MK-10 (Table 1). The hydroacylation reaction described should
be considered as a sequence of three successive reactions: the
formation of aldimine 3, the Rh-catalyzed hydroiminoacylation
leading to ketimine 9, and the hydrolysis of 9 yielding 10. The
rhodium catalyst is thus only involved in the hydroiminoacy-
lation reaction, while MK-10 catalyzes the two other processes.
Comparing the results shown in entries 1-6, it is apparent
that the neutral system [RhCl(PPh3)3] (entry 1) provides a much
higher conversion than any of the cationic catalytic systems
(entries 2-6). Low conversions were obtained when mono-
phosphines with different electronic properties (entries 2-5)
were used. When a monophosphite ligand (entry 6) was used,
no conversion was observed. However, when a source of
chloride was added to the reaction mixture (entry 7), a
comparable conversion to that obtained with the neutral system
was achieved (75%). This result suggested that, under these
conditions, the neutral rhodium catalytic system was restored.
Identical result was obtained when the reaction was performed
starting from aldimine 3, indicating that the nature of the
rhodium catalyst was the key to explain the behavior of these
catalytic systems.
The mechanism of the one-pot 2-picoline-assisted intermo-
lecular hydroacylation procedure has not yet been investigated.
The catalytic cycle proposed for this reaction involves the
(11) (a) Willis, M. C.; Randell-Sly, H. E.; Woodward, R. L.; McNally,
S. J.; Currie, G. S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5291. (b) Moxham, G. L.;
Randell-Sly, H. E.; Brayshaw, S. K.; Woodward, R. L.; Weller, A. S.; Willis,
M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7618. (c) Willis, M. C.; Randell-
Sly, H. E.; Woodward, R. L.; Currie, G. S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2249. (d)
Willis, M. C.; McNally, S. J.; Beswick, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 340.
(12) Wojcicki, A. AdV. Organomet. Chem. 1973, 11, 87.
(13) Imai, M.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ogata-Imai, N.;
Shimowatari, M.; Nagumo, S.; Kawahara, N.; Suemune, H. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 1144. (b) Tanaka, M.; Imai, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tanaka, K.;
Shimowatari, M.; Nagumo, S.; Kawahara, N.; Suemune, H. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 1365. (c) Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, M.; Suemune, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005,
46, 6053.
In light of these results, a mechanistic study using in situ
NMR and DFT calculations was undertaken in order to gain
insight into the difference of behavior between the neutral and
the cationic rhodium systems catalyzing the 2-picoline-assisted
intramolecular hydroacylation of alkenes.
Study of the Oxidative Addition by in situ NMR.
Neutral System. Initially, this process was investigated by NMR
spectroscopy. A THF-d8 solution of RhCl(PPh3)3 was charged
(14) Hong, T.-K.; Barchuck, A.; Krische, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 6885.
(15) Roy, A. H.; Lenges, C. P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 2082.
(16) Suggs, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 489.
(17) (a) Park, Y.-J.; Park, J.-W.; Jun, C.-H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41,
222. (b) Jun, C.-H.; Moon, C. W.; Lee, D. Y. Chem.sEur. J. 2002, 8,
2423. (c) Jun, C.-H.; Lee, D. Y.; Lee, H.; Hong, J.-B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2000, 39, 3070. (d) Jun, C.-H.; Hong, J.-B. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 2161.
(18) (a) Jun, C.-H.; Lee, H.; Hong, J.-B.; Kwon, B. I. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2146. (b) Lee, D. Y.; Hong, B. S.; Cho, E. G.; Lee, H.;
Jung, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6372. (c) Jun, C.-H.; Lee, H.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 577.
(22) (a) Jun, C.-H.; Lee, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 880. (b) Jun,
C.-H.; Lee, H.; Hong, J.-B. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1200. (c) Jun, C.-H.;
Hoh, C.-W.; Na, S.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 145. (d) Jun, C.-H.
Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 610.
(23) Ya´n˜ez, X.; Claver, C.; Castillo´n, S.; Ferna´ndez, E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 1631.
(24) Ya´n˜ez, X.; Castillo´n, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 1628.
(25) Claver, C.; Ferna´ndez, E.; Margalef-Catala`, R.; Medina, P.; Salagre,
P.; Sueiras, J. P. J. Catal. 2001, 201, 70.
(19) Lau, K. Y.; Becker, Y.; Huang, F.; Baenziger, N.; Stille, J. K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 566.
(20) Hyatt, I. E. D.; Anderson, H. K.; Morehead, A. T.; Sargent, A. L.
Organometallics 2008, 17, 135.
(21) (a) Bosnich, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 667. (b) Barnhart, R. W.;
Bosnich, B. Organometallics 1995, 14, 4343.