Product-assisted Catalysis of Threonine Synthase
is the two transaldimination processes starting from 6 and 8.
Ideally, the former should be inhibited, and the latter should
be promoted during the catalytic reaction of TS. It is, then,
important to know the effect of the phosphate ion on these
steps. However, as the rate constant for neither of these steps
in the absence of phosphate or sulfate could be obtained, the
effect of the phosphate ion can be discussed only in compari-
son with the effect of the sulfate ion.
group at C␥. However, as shown in this study, the released
phosphate in turn functions as the catalyst in the subsequent
steps, and this mechanism explains how the reaction is con-
trolled in TS at the branching point (6) of the catalysis divid-
ing the -synthase and the ␥-lyase. Although this is a crucial
element that warrants the reaction specificity of TS, the cata-
lytic reaction of TS contains other branching points that are
subject to side reactions unless there are mechanisms to con-
trol the pathway. These points should be studied in the future.
The rate constant for the transaldimination from 6 is 9-fold
higher in the presence of the sulfate ion (Table 3 and the esti-
mated value of kϩ3 ϭ 0.049 sϪ1 in the presence of phosphate),
whereas the rate constant for the transaldimination from 8 is
higher in the presence of phosphate. The difference between
the structure of 6 and 8 is the presence (8) or absence (6) of
the -OH group and the hybridization at C␣ (sp2 for 6 and
sp3 for 8). As the phosphate ion can interact with both the
-OH group and the ⑀-amino group of Lys-61 and the latter is
the group that directly involved in the transaldimination
process, the presence/absence of the -OH group may affect
the transaldimination process. As a simple hypothesis, assum-
ing that the -OH group and the ⑀-amino group of Lys-61
compete with each other for binding to the phosphate ion, we
can expect that the ⑀-amino group forms a hydrogen bond
with the phosphate ion in 6, as observed in the crystal struc-
ture of TS-10-P (Fig. 5) but is liberated from the phosphate
ion in 8. This may result in attenuating the transaldimination
of 6 without affecting the transaldimination of 8. The reverse
effect of the sulfate ion may be ascribed to the absence of pro-
tons in the sulfate ion.
REFERENCES
1. Flavin, M., and Slaughter, C. (1960) J. Biol. Chem. 235, 1112–1118
2. Alexander, F. W., Sandmeier, E., Mehta, P. K., and Christen, P. (1994)
Eur. J. Biochem. 219, 953–960
3. Hayashi, H., (1995) J. Biochem. 118, 463–473
4. Laber, B., Maurer, W., Hanke, C., Gra¨fe, S., Ehlert, S., Messerschmidt,
A., and Clausen, T. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 263, 212–221
5. Covarrubias, A. S., Ho¨gbom, M., Bergfors, T., Carroll, P., Mannerstedt,
K., Oscarson, S., Parish, T., Jones, T. A., and Mowbray, S. L. (2008) J.
Mol. Biol. 381, 622–633
6. Garrido-Franco, M., Ehlert, S., Messerschmidt, A., Marinkovic’, S., Hu-
ber, R., Laber, B., Bourenkov, G. P., and Clausen, T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem.
277, 12396–12405
7. Thomazeau, K., Curien, G., Dumas, R., and Biou, V. (2001) Protein Sci.
10, 638–648
8. Omi, R., Goto, M., Miyahara, I., Mizuguchi, H., Hayashi, H.,
Kagamiyama, H., and Hirotsu, K. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278,
46035–46045
9. Laber, B., Gerbling, K. P., Harde, C., Neff, K. H., Nordhoff, E., and
Pohlenz, H. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 3413–3423
10. Toney, M. D., and Kirsch, J. F. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1471–1479
11. Schnackerz, K. D., Ehrlich, J. H., Giesemann, W., and Reed, T. A. (1979)
Biochemistry 18, 3557–3563
Product-assisted Catalysis—As shown in the structure of
TS-10-P, the phosphate ion is stabilized by many residues at
the active site. This is considered to be the cause of the fairly
high affinity of the phosphate ion to TS (Kd ϭ 2.2 mM). How-
ever, comparison of the structure of the unliganded enzyme
and TS-10-P indicates that, among the residues interacting
with the phosphate ion in TS-10-P, Thr-88, Asn-154, and Ser-
155 move toward the phosphate ion upon the conformational
change from the open to the closed structure induced by the
substrate binding. Therefore, it is expected that during the
catalysis the phosphate ion has a much higher affinity to the
enzyme than that to the unliganded enzyme. The phosphate
ion released at the step of 4 3 5 is then considered to remain
at the active site and acts as the catalytic base that directs the
reaction from 6 toward the formation of L-threonine.
12. Madsen, B. C., and Murphy, R. J. (1981) Anal. Chem. 53, 1924–1926
13. Mo¨ckel, B., Eggeling, L., and Sahm, H. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174,
8065–8072
14. Otowinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276,
307–326
15. Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 (1994) Acta Crystallogr.
D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760–763
16. Bru¨nger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P.,
Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu,
N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998)
Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905–921
17. McRee, D. E. (1999) J. Struct. Biol. 125, 156–165
18. Kleywegt, G. J., and Jones, T. A. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 208–230
19. Ikushiro, H., Hayashi, H., and Kagamiyama, H. (2004) Biochemistry 43,
1082–1092
20. Jhee, K. H., Niks, D., McPhie, P., Dunn, M. F., and Miles, E. W. (2001)
Biochemistry 40, 10873–10880
The product-assisted catalysis in the enzyme has been re-
ported for human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase/lyase (27).
The enzyme cleaves 8-oxoguanine from DNA and uses it as a
catalyst for the following steps. Although the reactions cata-
lyzed by TS and 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase/lyase are dif-
ferent, both reactions are complex and involve many elemen-
tary steps. Therefore, during the evolution, these enzymes
may have adopted a strategy to expand their catalytic poten-
tial by incorporating the product as the catalytic species.
One of the reasons for the presence of the phosphate group
in the natural substrate OPHS is to provide a good leaving
21. Hur, O., Niks, D., Casino, P., and Dunn, M. F. (2002) Biochemistry 41,
9991–10001
22. Karsten, W. E., and Cook, P. F. (2002) Methods Enzymol. 354, 223–237
23. Dunathan, H. C. (1966) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 55, 712–716
24. Johnston, M., Marcotte., P., Donovan, J., and Walsh, C. (1979) Biochem-
istry 18, 1729–1738
25. Esaki, N., Suzuki, T., Tanaka, H., Soda, K., and Rando, R. R. (1977) FEBS
Lett. 84, 309–312
26. Feng, L., and Kirsch, J. F. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 2436–2444
27. Fromme, J. C., Bruner, S. D., Yang, W., Karplus, M., and Verdine, G. L.
(2003) Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 204–211
2784 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
VOLUME 286•NUMBER 4•JANUARY 28, 2011