2538
S. Antoniotti, E. Duñach / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 2536–2539
but again, ketone 3b was obtained quantitatively (not shown).
With substrate 1c, compared to substrate 1a, the only change of
methyl group for a hydrogen atom on the oxirane significantly al-
tered the regioselectivity of the reaction yielding a 7/3 mixture of
In terms of mechanism, we hypothesize that, following the for-
mation of the starting complex A, the reaction could start with an
ester group attacking the epoxide on the opposite side at the less
substituted position to form intermediate B (Scheme 2). Intermedi-
ate B would further dealkylate to yield C, in a process similar to the
dealkylative lactonization recently described in TfOH-mediated
reactions, and maybe favored by the involvement of a water mol-
ecule.42 Protonolysis of the tin alcoholate would then lead to 2
and the recovery of the catalyst. The putative seven-membered
ring chelate A allows to explain why a less strained five-membered
ring-closure with the attack of the less substituted oxirane atom is
observed while Lewis acid epoxide ring-opening usually proceeds
through the attack of the most substituted carbon atom, where
more stable carbocations could be formed.
diastereoisomers of c
- and d-lactones 2c and 2c0 almost quantita-
tively (entry 5). The decrease in steric hindrance at carbon atom
d in that particular case probably allowed the nucleophilic attack
of one ester group, disfavored in the case of 1a. Substrate 1d did
not cyclize under our conditions (entry 6) and the isomerization
of the epoxide to both possible carbonyl compounds 3d and 3d0 oc-
curred, within a complex mixture of unidentified products. In that
case, the lower substitution of the oxirane ring and the absence of
substituent at carbon atom
a resulted in a decrease in the overall
efficiency of the reaction. Taking into account the results of entries
2–4,6, it appeared more plausible that rather than a coordination of
the electron-rich alkyne moiety to the metal during the cyclization,
In summary, we have described a novel tin(IV) triflimidate-cat-
alyzed (5 mol %) cyclization reaction involving the ring-opening of
the presence of a quaternary carbon atom at position
a
, putting the
epoxides by readily available ethyl ester groups to d-hydroxy-c-
substrate into a more favorable conformation for cyclization in a
lactones in 46–98% yields.43 We suggest that the reaction is under
the control of steric hindrance and conformation through a
Thorpe–Ingold type effect.
Thorpe–Ingold type effect,40 could explain our results. Thus, sub-
strate 1e, with a methyl substituent at carbon atom
to d-hydroxy- -lactone 2e in 65% yield as a 3/2 mixture of diaste-
reoisomers (entry 7).
a, cyclized
c
Acknowledgments
The case of compound 1f offered another example of competi-
tion cyclization/isomerization with the formation of the d-hydro-
This work was supported by the CNRS, the University of Nice—
Sophia Antipolis, and the CP2D program of the French National Re-
search Agency (ANR CASAL).
xy-
ketone 3f formed in 53% yield (entry 8). Compound 1g bearing a
prenyl side chain selectively cyclized to d-hydroxy- -lactone 2g
c-lactone 2f in a moderate 46% yield, the main product being
c
in 85% yield (dr = 2/1, entry 9). During the process, the question
of whether or not 2g could then cyclize again through a Sn(IV)-cat-
alyzed intramolecular hydroalkoxylation18 was of concern, but no
eight-membered product was observed. The best result was
undoubtedly obtained with substrate 1h bearing a methyl group
References and notes
1. Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259–281.
2. Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7117–7140.
3. Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis; Beller, M., Bolm, C., Eds., 2nd ed.; Wiley-
VCH, Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, 2004.
at carbon atom
zation, and the d-hydroxy-
(dr = 1/1, entry 10) in sharp contrast with what was observed with
substrate 1b (entry 2). Substrate 1i cyclized to d-hydroxy- -lac-
tone 2i in 45% yield, with isomerized ketone 3i (55%, entry 11). This
result suggests that the presence of two ester groups is important
to achieve good yields of cyclized product. Finally, substrate 1j
a
for optimal conformational control during cycli-
4. Michelet, V.; Toullec, P. Y.; Genêt, J.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4268–
4315.
c
-lactone 2h was obtained in 98% yield
5. Aubert, C.; Buisine, O.; Malacria, M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 813–834.
6. Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333–346.
7. Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3180–3211.
8. Zhang, L.; Sun, J.; Kozmin, S. A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2271–2296.
9. Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7817–7831.
10. Ma, S. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78, 197–208.
11. Yamamoto, H.; Futatsugi, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1924–1942.
12. Oe, Y.; Ohta, T.; Ito, Y. Synlett 2005, 179–181.
c
without substituent at the
led to a mixture of d-hydroxy-
a
position nor additional ester function
-lactone 2j and ketone 3j in 73%
13. Shen, H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3885–3903.
14. Tietze, L. F.; Kinzel, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 629–650.
15. Chapman, C. J.; Frost, C. G. Synthesis 2007, 1–21.
c
and 27% yields, respectively. As for 1f, the presence of a phenyl
16. Tietze, L. F. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115–136.
group was beneficial to the cyclization process even without qua-
17. Padwa, A.; Bur, S. K. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 5341–5378.
18. Coulombel, L.; Favier, I.; Duñach, E. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2286–2288.
19. Coulombel, L.; Rajzmann, M.; Pons, J.-M.; Olivero, S.; Duñach, E. Chem. Eur.
J. 2006, 12, 6356–6365.
20. Chaminade, X.; Coulombel, L.; Olivero, S.; Duñach, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
3554–3557.
ternary carbon atom at
a position. It is worth noting than only one
single diastereomer was obtained for d-hydroxy-
c-lactones 2i and
2j.41
21. Weiwer, M.; Coulombel, L.; Duñach, E. Chem. Commun. 2006, 332–334.
22. Chaminade, X.; Chiba, S.; Narasaka, K.; Dunach, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
2384–2387.
23. Grau, F.; Heumann, A.; Duñach, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7285–7289.
24. Tsuji, H.; Yamagata, K.-I.; Itoh, Y.; Endo, K.; Nakamura, M.; Nakamura, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8060–8062.
O
EtOOC
EtOOC
O
O
[Sn]
R
OH
EtOOC
R
1
2
25. Dai, L.-Z.; Qi, M.-J.; Shi, Y.-L.; Liu, X.-G.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3191–3194.
26. Dai, L.-Z.; Shi, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7011–7018.
27. Hashmi, S. A. K.; Sinha, P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 432–438.
28. Ji, K.-G.; Shen, Y.-W.; Shu, X.-Z.; Xiao, H.-Q.; Bian, Y.-J.; Liang, Y.-M. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2008, 350, 1275–1280.
29. Shu, X.-Z.; Liu, X.-Y.; Xiao, H.-Q.; Ji, K.-G.; Guo, L.-N.; Qi, C.-Z.; Liang, Y. M. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2493–2498.
30. Hashmi, A.; Stephen, K.; Bührle, M.; Salathé, R.; Bats, J. W. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 2059–2064.
H+
O
O
O
O
O
O
R
R
O
O
-
[Sn]
O
[Sn]
A
O
31. Shu, X.-Z.; Liu, X.-Y.; Ji, K.-G.; Xiao, H.-Q.; Liang, Y.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14,
5282–5289.
32. Cordonnier, M.-C.; Blanc, A.; Pale, P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1569–1572.
33. Antoniotti, S.; Duñach, E. Chem. Commun. 2008, 993–995.
34. Nacro, K.; Baltas, M.; Escudier, J.-M.; Gorrichon, L. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 659–
672.
35. Justicia, J.; Oller-Lopez, J. L.; Campana, A. G.; Oltra, J. E.; Cuerva, J. M.; Bunuel,
E.; Cardenas, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14911–14921.
36. Bernard, A. M.; Frongia, A.; Piras, P. P.; Secci, F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2923–2926.
C
O
- [CH3-CH2]+
+
O
H2O
R
B
O
-
O
HOEt
+ H+
[Sn]
O
Scheme 2.