Switching counterion to tosylate led to isomer 5a as the
sole product, regardless of solvent (entries 13 and 14). The
reaction was considerably slower than previously observed;
however, mild heating allowed a quantitative yield of pure
pyrrole 5a to be obtained in 3 h (entry 15). The lower activity
of the Ph3PAuOTs system is assigned to the tighter ion pair
present in comparison to Ph3PAuOTf.
A range of aryl-substituted aziridines were then prepared
to further study these effects. The substrates were subjected
to three sets of conditions based on the use of PPh3AuCl as
precatalyst (Table 2): System A employs AgOTf in dichlo-
systems A and B. Increased amounts of 2,5-isomer 5 were
seen when the bromine was in the ortho-position (entries 7
and 8 vs entries 4 and 5). The presence of a more electron-
rich aromatic substituent (1d and 1f) led to the 2,4-isomer 6
as the major product (entries 10 and 16).19 The substitution
pattern of the benzene unit remains unchanged over the
process. Interestingly, the presence of an additional aryl unit
at the alkyne terminus appears to aid the formation of 6 under
certain conditions (entries 17 vs 11).
The results can be explained by considering the basicity
of the counterion. In the presence of a sufficiently basic
counterion such as tosylate (System C), proton elimination
and transfer from 3 is facilitated (Scheme 4, Path I),
regardless of reaction solvent. In the absence of such a
counterion, an aromatic or otherwise weakly Lewis basic
solvent can also mediate the proton transfer pathway, at a
sufficient rate to see formation of 5 (System B). The
intermediacy of the vinyl gold unit is established by the
predominant incorporation of a deuterium label in that
position when the reaction was run in D2O-washed 1,2-
Table 2. Gold-Catalyzed Synthesis of Pyrrolesa
(5) For a recent report exploring the position and effect of counterion
on alkene-cationic gold fragments, see: Zuccaccia, D.; Belpassi, L.;
Tarantelli, F.; Macchione, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 31, 3170.
(6) Lian, J. J.; Chen, P. C.; Lin, Y. P.; Ting, H. C.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11372.
(7) (a) Lemie`re, G.; Gandon, V.; Agenet, N.; Goddard, J.-P.; de Kozak,
A.; Aubert, C.; Fensterbank, L; Malacria, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7596. (b) Lin, G.-Y; Yang, C.-Y; Liu, R.-S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
6753.
(8) Bhunia, S.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16488.
(9) Gorin, D. G.; Watson, I. D. G.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 3736.
(10) (a) Xia, Y.; Dudnik, A. S.; Gevorgyan, V.; Li, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 6940. (b) Sromek, A. W.; Rubina, M.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10500. (c) Dudnik, A. S.; Sromek, A. W.; Rubina,
M.; Kim, J. T.; Kel’in, A. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
1440.
(11) Zhang, Z.; Liu, C.; Kinder, R. E.; Han, X.; Qian, H.; Widenhoefer,
R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9066.
(12) Hamilton, G. L.; Kang, E. J.; Mba, M.; Toste, F. D. Science 2007,
317, 496.
(13) For selected reviews of heterocycle synthesis by gold, see: (a) Patil,
N.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 3395. (b) Kirsch, S. F. Synthesis
2008, 3183. (c) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. ArkiVoc 2007, 121. (d) Shen,
H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7847. (e) Shen, H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64,
3885.
(14) For examples of gold-catalyzed pyrrole synthesis, see: (a) Witham,
C. A.; Mauleon, P.; Shapiro, N. D.; Sherry, B. D.; Toste, F. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5838. (b) Istrate, F. M.; Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 3181. (c) Seregin, I. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
12050. (d) Harrison, T. J.; Kozak, J. A.; Corbella-Pane´, M.; Dake, G. R. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4525. (e) Gorin, D. J.; Davis, N. R; Toste, F. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11260. (f) Arcadi, A.; Di Guiseppe, S.;
Marinelli, F.; Rossi, E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2715. (g) Arcadi,
A.; Di Guiseppe, S.; Marinelli, F.; Rossi, E. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343,
443.
a All reactions are run using 0.2 mmol of substrate with 5 mol % of
gold and silver species at 0.2 M concentration. b System A employs AgOTf
in CH2Cl2 at rt. System B employs AgOTf in toluene at rt. System C
employs AgOTs in ClCH2CH2Cl at 70 °C. c Isolated percentage yields of
1
pyrrole products with ratio of isomers determined from H NMR.
(15) Li, A. H.; Zhou, Y. G.; Dai, L. X.; Hou, X. L.; Xia, L. J.; Lin, L.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4338.
romethane; System B employs AgOTf in toluene; System C
employs AgOTs in 1,2-dichloroethane at 70 °C.
(16) (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Sinha, P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 432.
(b) Yoshida, M.; Al-Amin, M.; Matsuda, K.; Shishido, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 5021.
Across all substrates, the use of System C led exclusively
to the single isomers 5a-5f in quantitative yield (Table 2).
Reaction workup and purification consisted solely of filtering
the reaction mixture through a plug of silica gel. System B
generally gave a mixture of isomers 5 and 6 with the ratio
dependent on the nature of the substituents. System A
generally led to the formation of isomer 6 as the major (or
sole) product.
(17) Throughout this study, the aziridines were used as mixtures of the
cis- and trans-diastereomers, with the cis-diastereomer predominant. See
Supporting Information for ratios.
(18) Isomers 5a and 6a were distinguished spectroscopically by a
comparison of the chemical shifts for the protons attached to the pyrrole
rings [(1H NMR; CDCl3) 5a: 6.07 ppm and 6.04 ppm (J ) 3.3 Hz); 6a:
7.58 ppm and 6.33 ppm (J ) 1.9 Hz)]. 6a shows the relative deshielding
which is characteristic for a proton in the 5-position of a pyrrole. 1D GOESY
(NOE) experiments confirm the regiochemistry within 6a (see Supporting
Information).
Aziridines substituted with electron-deficient aryl units (1b
and 1c) give lower proportions of the 2,4-isomer 6 with
(19) The use of the 4-methoxyphenyl substituent led to degradation of
the starting material.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009
2295