BULLETIN OF THE
Note
KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Table 1. Enantioselectivity of PHL towards sec-alcohols
should not bear a bulky group at the β-position from the
hydroxyl group.
O
H
O
O
H
O
PHL (20 mg)
+
+
O
Experimental
R
Pr
tBuOMe (1 mL)
O
R
R
25 °C
rac-3a-h
(0.1 mmol)
(R)-4a-h
(S)-3
Rates of Ester Hydrolysis. Rates of ester hydrolysis were
measured calorimetrically as reported in the literature.7 The
reaction mixtures contained 1.25–12.5 mM of substrates.
(0.3 mmol)
H
O
H
O
H
O
OH
H
O
Enantioselectivity of PHL for Transesterification of Sec-
Alcohols. The reaction mixture was prepared by mixing a
rac-alcohol (3a–h, 0.1 mmol), vinyl butyrate (39 μL,
0.3 mmol), and immobilized PHL (20 mg) in t-butyl
methyl ether (MTBE, 1 mL). The reaction mixture was
shaken at 200 rpm. A little amount of the reaction mixture
(200 μL) was retrieved and dissolved in MTBE (1 mL).
After centrifugation of the diluted reaction mixture to
remove the immobilized PHL, the clear solution was ana-
lyzed by a GC (Agilent 6890N; Agilent Technologies,
Seoul, Korea) equipped with a chiral capillary column
(Cyclosil-B 30 m × 0.25 mm). The GC analysis condition
for the reaction with 3e: initial column temperature 80ꢀC
for 5 min, ramp up to 120ꢀC at a rate of 2.5ꢀC/min, and
then held at 120ꢀC for 15 min.
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
H
O
H
O
H
O
l
C
3f
3g
3h
Substrate
Time (h)
% ee of (R)-4a
Conv. (%)b
E
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
a
16
16
16
44
16
16
44
16
82.4
58.9
41
38
49
10
40
29
2
20
5
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>99.9
>99.9
>99.9
>99.9
>99.9
>99.9
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the
Basic Science Research Program through the National
Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Minis-
50
The ee values were determined by GC.
try
of
Science,
ICT
and
Future
Planning
b
Conversions were calculated from enantiomeric excesses of both the
(2014R1A2A2A01004836).
starting materials and products.8
Supporting Information. Additional supporting informa-
tion is available in the online version of this article.
iso-propyl group, although it shows low conversion (10%
for 44 h). Besides, PHL well discriminated the enantiomers
when a methyl group for the medium substituent and a
phenyl group or phenyl derivatives for the large substituent
were present (3d–h). However, 3g shows low conversion
(2% for 44 h).
References
1. U. T. Bornscheuer, R. J. Kazlauskas, Hydrolases in Organic
Synthesis: Regio- and Stereoselective Biotransformations, 2nd
ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.
The survey of the substrate selectivity of PHL provides
useful guidance regarding synthetic applications. Similar to
other lipases, PHL preferred ester substrates carrying longer
carbon chain alcohol moieties. As the carbon chain length
of alcohols increases, PHL exhibited not only higher reac-
tion rate in hydrolysis of esters but also higher conversion
in transesterification of sec-alcohol. In contrast, PHL
favored substrates containing certain carbon length for the
acyl groups. This suggests that use of an acyl donor with
medium carbon lengths (C4–C8) would be a better choice
in the reaction by PHL. In addition, PHL exhibited high
enantioselectivity towards sec-alcohols bearing a methyl
group as the medium substituent and a larger group than an
ethyl group as the large substituent. However, when
dimethyl or a phenyl group is present at the β-position from
the hydroxyl group of sec-alcohol, the reaction was
severely retarded, although the enantioselectivity is high
(E > 200). It implies that the better substrate for PHL
2. Review: J. M. Woodley, Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 321.
3. G. Grogan, Practical Biotransformations, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, 2009, p. 43.
4. (a) G. S. Nguyen, M. L. Thompson, G. Grogan,
U. T. Bornscheuer, R. Kourist, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2011,
70, 88; (b) C. Guérard-Hélaine, V. de Berardinis,
M. Besnard-Gonnet, E. Darii, M. Debacker, A. Debard,
C. Fernandes, V. Hélaine, A. Mariage, V. Pellouin, A. Perret,
J.-L. Petit, M. Sancelme, M. Lemaire, M. Salanoubat, Chem-
CatChem 2015, 7, 1871; (c) Review: A. Currin,
N. Swainston, P. J. Day, D. B. Kell, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015,
44, 1172.
5. S. Park, Korean J. Microbiol. 2015, 51, 187.
6. (a) E. Santaniello, S. Casati, P. Ciuffreda, Curr. Org. Chem.
2006, 10, 1095; (b) L. D. Patterson, M. J. Miller, J. Org.
Chem. 2010, 75, 1289; (c) S. Alatorre-Santamaría, V. Gotor-
Fernández, V. Gotor, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 6, 1057.
7. (a) L. E. Jane, R. J. Kazaluskas, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
4560; (b) L. E. Jane, A. C. Löwendahl, R. J. Kazlauskas,
Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2016
© 2016 Korean Chemical Society, Seoul & Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3