COPPER(I) π-COMPLEXES WITH 2-BUTYNE-1,4-DIOL
623
another, the dimers {[CuCl2(HOCH2C≡CCH2OH]–}2
in I are arranged in stacks along the direction [100]
(Fig. 1).
Table 3. The bond lengths (d) and bond angles (ω) in struc-
ture I
Bond
d, Å
Angle
ω, deg
The electrostatic cation–anion interaction in struc-
ture I has a pronounced direction due to the active par-
ticipation of a six-membered cyclic 2-aminopyridinium
cation in the formation of a strong hydrogen bonding
system N–H···O and N–H···Cl (H(9)···O(2) 1.89,
H(8)···Cl(1) 2.29 Å), which cross links the dimeric
anions to give peculiar framework.
Cu–Cl(1)
2.25(5) Cl(1)CuCl(2)
2.24(4) Cl(1)Cum
2.01(8) Cl(2)Cum
2.01(4) C(2)CuC(3)
1.92(7)
107.8(1)
126.2(4)
125.9(2)
35.2(3)
Cu–Cl(2)
Cu–C(2)
Cu–C(3)
Thus, as compared to spherical alkali metal cations
or highly symmetric ammonium cation, the planar
2-aminopyridinium cations with asymmetric distribu-
tion of the positive charge in the pyridine ring are inca-
pable of radical changing of the packing type of the
complex anions, but affect the parameters of the copper
π-coordination core as compared to the previously
stided compounds M[CuCl2(HOCH2C≡CCH2OH)]
Cu–m*
C(2)≡C(3)
C(1)–C(2)
C(3)–C(4)
C(1)–O(1)
C(4)–O(2)
N(1)–C(5)
N(1)–C(9)
N(2)–C(5)
C(5)–C(6)
C(6)–C(7)
C(7)–C(8)
C(8)–C(9)
H(1)···Cl(2)
H(2)···Cl(1)
H(8)···Cl(1)
H(9)···O(2)
H(7)···Cl(2)
H(13)···Cl(1)
H(10)···O(1)
1.22(2) O(1)C(1)C(2)
1.49(1) C(1)C(2)C(3)
1.48(4) C(2)C(3)C(4)
1.42(7) C(3)C(4)O(2)
1.40(6) C(1)O(1)H(1)
1.35(3) C(4)O(2)H(2)
1.372(8)
112.5(4)
165.6(4)
165.3(5)
111.3(6)
108.9(4)
108.0(5)
(M = NH+4 , K+, Rb+), space groups Ibam [5, 6] and
(ImH)[CuCl2(HOCH2C≡CCH2OH)] [8].
REFERENCES
1. Temkin, O.N., Shestakov, G.K., and Treger, Yu.A.,
Atsetilen: Khimiya, Mekhanizmy Reaktsii, Tekhnologiya
(Acetylene: Chemistry, Reaction Mechanisms, and
Technology), Moscow: Khimiya, 1991.
1.343(9) N(1)C(5)N(2)
1.39(5) N(2)C(5)C(6)
1.355(9) N(1)C(5)C(6)
1.39(3) C(6)C(7)C(8)
1.35(5) C(8)C(9)N(1)
118.8(4)
118.7(6)
119.7(4)
120.7(4)
120.3(4)
154.9
2. Mykhalichko, B.M., Temkin, O.N., and Mys’kiv, M.G.,
Usp. Khim., 2000, vol. 69, no. 11, p. 1042.
3. Pavlyuk, A.V., Mykhalichko, B.M., and Mys’kiv, M.G.,
Koord. Khim., 2004, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 172 [Russ. J.
Coord. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 30, no. 3, p. 159].
4. Mys’kiv, M.G., Osechkin, S.I., Zavalii, P.Yu., and Fun-
damenskii, V.S., Koord. Khim., 1988, vol. 14, no. 4,
p. 524.
2.27
2.20
2.29
1.89
2.42
2.80
2.43
O(1)–H(1)···Cl(2)
O(2)–H(2)···Cl(1)
N(2)–H(8)···Cl(1)
N(2)–H(9)···O(2)
N(1)–H(7)···Cl(2)
5. Mykhalichko, B.M., Slyvka, Yu.I., and Davydov, V.N.,
Koord. Khim., 2003, vol. 29, no. 10, p. 796 [Russ. J.
Coord. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 29, no. 10, p. 737].
164.1
167.1
6. Slyvka, Yu.I., Mykhalichko, B.M., and Davydov, V.N.,
Zh. Neorg. Khim., 2003, vol. 48, no. 9, p. 1500 [Russ. J.
Inorg. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 48, no. 9, p. 1364].
166.6
136.4
7. Slyvka, Yu.I., Mykhalichko, B.M., and Davydov, V.N.,
Koord. Khim., 2005, vol. 31, no. 12, p. 931 [Russ. J.
Coord. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 31, no. 12, p. 884].
C(9)–H(13)···Cl(1) 134.3
C(6)–H(10)···O(1) 131.0
8. Slyvka, Yu.I., Mykhalichko, B.M., Goreshnik, E.A., and
Davydov, V.N., Zh. Neorg. Khim., 2007, vol. 52, no. 2,
p. 205 [Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 52,
no. 2, p. 165].
H(1)O(1)C(1)C(2)
O(1)C(1)C(2)C(3)
C(1)C(2)C(3)C(4)
60.1
17(3)
–3(4)
9. Aksel’rud, L.G., Grin’,Yu.N., Zavalii, P.Yu., et al., Paket
programm dlya strukturnogo analiza kristallov - SSD.
Obshchie opisanie (CSD Program Package for the Struc-
tural Analysis of Crystals. General Description), Lviv:
Lviv. Gos. Univ, 1990.
C(2)C(3)C(4)O(2) –16(3)
C(3)C(4)O(2)H(2) –61.7
10. Steiner, T., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct.
Commun., 1996, vol. 52, no. 11, p. 2885.
* m is the midpoint of the C≡C bond.
11. Desiraju, G.R., Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, vol. 35, p. 565.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF COORDINATION CHEMISTRY Vol. 34 No. 8 2008