described with modest success.14 The strength of our
proposed methodology is the possibility to produce the allyl
or vinyl products (as 1 and 3, Figure 1) selectively. To our
knowledge, neither of the methods described before allows
the stereoselective formation of the syn products efficiently.
Our rationale to study these reactions is illustrated in Scheme
2. Minimization of the allylic 1,3-strain and intramolecular
dipole-dipole effects are both alleviated in transition-state
model C. Rotating the stereogenic center at C-3, in order to
get access to the top face of the radical, leads to unfavorable
transition state D. Two additional destabilizing interactions are
now present: an allylic 1,3-strain between C-R with the ester
and the presence of two bisecting functionalities C-O and C-R
to the incoming double bond. On this basis, one will predict
that the transition state C be of lower energy thus determining
the relative stereochemistry of the quaternary center at C-2
versus the stereogenic center at C-3.
Scheme 3. Regioselectivity of the Radical Cyclization
As stated before, our goal is the transfer of an allyl or a vinyl
to the tertiary radical in order to generate the 2,3-syn stereogenic
quaternary centers using a silicon-tethered radical trap. In order
to reach the necessary cyclic ꢀ-bromosilyloxy intermediates that
would lead to these products, regioselective 7-endo-trig or
5-exo-trig (see E and G, Scheme 3) cyclizations have to be
favored over the competing 6-exo-trig and 6-endo-trig (F and
H) pathways. The corresponding transition states are depicted
in Scheme 3, the orientation of the planar carbon-centered
radicals being consistent to the steric and electronic effects
described above (Scheme 2). A priori it is problematic to predict
the lowest energy transition states in those reactions using the
Baldwin-Beckwith rules.15 Indeed, the presence of silicon in
the cyclizing chain of a number of reactions has generated
different results from the ones expected.16 The increases in bond
lengths of O-Si and C-Si as compared to O-C and C-C
bonds are probable causes of these variances, thus the need to
evaluate those reactions experimentally.17,18
silane bearing a bromide atom to aldehydes activated by a
Lewis acids.19
The silylation reactions were achieved using well-known
conditions. Chlorodimethylallylsilane or chlorodimethylvinyl-
silane was added to CH2Cl2 or DMF solutions of alcohol in
the presence of pyridine or imidazole at room temperature. The
resulting silyloxy ethers (substrates 5a,b to 12a,b and 29a,b to
34a,b) were subsequently isolated in excellent yields.
Solutions of the silyloxy ethers in benzene or toluene20
bearing an allyl (Table 1) or a vinyl (Table 2) subunit were
then exposed to free-radical conditions by adding 0.05 equiv
of a solution of Et3B at 0 °C. For optimal results, we added
at 15-30 min intervals the same quantity of a solution of
Et3B for a period of 4 h or until the reactions were completed
as indicated by TLC.21 A mild acidic treatment leads to the
elimination products and the formation of the quaternary
centers bearing an allyl or a vinyl substituent.
The synthesis in good yields of ꢀ-hydroxy-R-tertiary
bromoesters, our precursors to the silyloxy ethers, have been
realized by adding a mixture of E/Z-tetrasubstituted enoxy-
As seen in Table 1, excellent to fair yields of the 2,3-
syn products, in a ratio greater than 20:1, were obtained.
Indeed, excellent ratios are noted even when lower alkanes
are present (entries 1 and 2) as opposed to our previous
protocol (vide supra). Our reactions are compatible with
the presence of a phenyl group in the R position (entry 3)
and with the usual protecting groups on hydroxyl groups
on C-4 (entries 4 and 5). Of particular importance is the
2,3-syn diastereoselectivity noted regardless of the C-3-C-4
(12) See, for example: (a) Nishiyama, H.; Kitajima, T.; Matsumoto, M.;
Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 49, 2298. (b) Stork, G.; Kahn, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 500. (c) Bogen, S.; Malacria, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 3992. (d) Fensterbank, L.; Dhimane, A.-L.; Wu, S.; Lacoˆte, E.;
Bogen, S.; Malacria, M. Tetrahedron 1996, 11405, and references therein.
(e) Blaszykowski, C.; Dhimane, A.-L.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Org.
Lett. 2003, 8, 1341.
(13) Allyl: (a) Shuto, S.; Terauchi, M.; Yahiro, Y.; Abe, H.; Ichikawa,
S.; Matsuda, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4151. (b) Kanazaki, M.; Ueno,
Y.; Shuto, S.; Matsuda, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2422. (c) Terauchi,
M.; Yahiro, Y.; Abe, H.; Ichikawa, S.; Tovey, S. C.; Dedos, S. G.; Taylor,
C. W.; Potter, B. V. L.; Matsuda, A.; Shuto, S. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 3697.
(d) Shuto, S.; Yahiro, Y.; Ichikawa, S.; Matsuda, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 5547. (e) Kodama, T.; Shuto, S.; Nomura, M.; Matsuda, A. Chem.sEur.
J. 2001, 7, 2332. (f) Sakaguchi, N.; Hirano, S.; Matsuda, A.; Shuto, S.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3291. (g) Stork, G.; Suk, H. S.; Kim, G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 7054. (h) Xi, Z.; Rong, J.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 5255. (i) Sukeda, M.; Ichikawa, S.; Matsuda, A.; Shuto, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4748. (j) Sukeda, M.; Ichikawa, S.; Matsuda, A.;
Shuto, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3465.
(17) Barton, T. J.; Revis, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3802.
(18) For references on the ꢀ-silicon effect (also called silicon hyper-
conjugation), see: (a) Ibrahim, M. R.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 819. (b) Lambert, J. B.; Zhao, Y.; Emblidge, R. W.; Salvador,
L. A.; Liu, X.; So, J.-H.; Chelius, E. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 183. (c)
Chabaud, L.; James, P.; Landais, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3173.
(19) Mochirian, P.; Cardinal-David, B.; Gue´rin, B.; Pre´vost, M.;
Guindon, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7067.
(14) Curran, D. P.; Ramamoorthy, P. S. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 4841.
(15) (a) Baldwin, J. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734. (b)
Beckwith, A. L. J.; Easton, C. J.; Serelis, A. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1980, 482.
(20) The optimization of this reaction was initially performed in benzene
to avoid benzylic bromination. However, few reactions done in toluene
demonstrate that good yields and excellent diastereoselectivites can be
obtained which represent a great alternative to benzene (entries 1, 4, 5, 7,
and 8 in Table 1 and entry 2 in Table 2).
(16) (a) Wilt, J. W.; Lusztyk, J.; Peeran, M.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 281. (b) Saigo, K.; Tateishi, K.; Hiroshi, A.; Saotome, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1572.
3150
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 14, 2009