likely, directly to the product 2 concomitant either the product
complex (3)Cu+ or that of the corresponding Cu+ thiol
moiety, where the latter easily forms the dihydrobenzothiazole
3 under the reaction conditions; note that the added acid may
serve to return Cu(I) back to the catalytic cycle. An alternative
to the proposed mechanism may be the reaction pathway
involving a multi-centered transition state,16 i.e. simultaneous
cleavage of the S–S bond resulting in formation of a new C–S
bond, and accompanied by hydrogen migration. This scenario
would thus circumvent the oxidative addition of copper to
the disulfide. Indirect evidence for the involvement of an
intermediate Cu–H bond is also provided by the loss of neutral
CuH from (3b)Cu+ (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 CID spectrum of mass-selected (1b)Cu+ (m/z 487 for the 63Cu
isotope) showing the highly preferential loss of neutral 2a to formally
afford (3b)Cu+ (m/z 276). The protonated benzothiazole [2bꢁH]+
(m/z 212) arises from consecutive loss of neutral CuH from
(3b)Cu+. The signals at m/z 294 and 308 are due to subsequent
addition of water and methanol, respectively, present as residuals
from the spray solvent in the background of the mass spectrometer.
The inset shows the measured and calculated isotope pattern of the
(1b)Cu+ precursor ion.
In conclusion, we present a concise mechanism of the
interaction between Cu(I) and a disulfide moiety involved in
a useful chemical transformation and thus introduce the
concept of using disulfides as an oxidant for Cu(I). The key
intermediate of the suggested mechanism does not contradict
the involvement of Cu(III) species. Supported by the chemical
experiments and corroborated by the gas-phase data, the
present results thus provide vital insight into the origin of this
increasingly important interaction.
The apparent threshold of this fragmentation of about
2 eV12 is qualitatively consistent with a reaction in the
condensed phase occurring at ambient conditions.13 Thus,
The work was supported by the Czech Academy of Sciences
(Z40550506), and the grant agencies GAAV (KJB400550704),
GACR (203/08/1318), and HNSF (OTKA 60679).
the gas-phase experiments demonstrate
a purely intra-
molecular reaction of a mononuclear copper species as a viable
scenario for the overall reaction. To further support these
conclusions, also the Cu(I) complex of the derivative 1a
(R = 2-chloro-5-nitrophenyl) and a specifically deuterated
isotopolog, [D2]-1a, were investigated by means of ESI MS.
Again, loss of the neutral thiazole is observed as the by far
predominating fragmentation of mass-selected (1a)Cu+, and
for ([D2]-1a)Cu+ the deuterium label is completely left in the
ionic product, as expected.
Notes and references
1 (a) T. Punniyamurthy, S. Velusamy and J. Iqbal, Chem. Rev., 2005,
105, 2329–2363; (b) S.-J. Jin, P. K. Arora and L. M. Sayre, J. Org.
Chem., 1990, 55, 3011–3018; (c) M. E. Bluhm, M. Ciesielski,
H. Gorls, O. Walter and M. Doring, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42,
8878–8885; (d) P. Chaudhuri, M. Hess, U. Florke and
K. Wieghardt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2017–2020;
(e) P. Gamez, I. W. C. E. Arends, J. Reedijk and R. A. Sheldon,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 2414–2415.
2 (a) Z. Li and Ch.-J. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 11810–11811;
(b) W.-J. Yoo and Ch.-J. Li, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 6266–6268.
3 (a) N. Taniguchi, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 7874–7876;
(b) R. P. Houser, J. A. Halfen, V. G. Young, N. J. Blackburn
and W. B. Tolman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 10745–10746.
4 (a) S. Itoh, M. Nagagawa and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 4087–4088; (b) Y. Ueno, Y. Tachi and S. Itoh, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 12428–12429.
Further insight into the reaction mechanism was
obtained by kinetic investigations. A primary isotope effect
(kH/kD = 2.3) was observed when H(D)-iminodisulfides were
treated with Cu(I) under the reaction conditions, indicating
that C–H(D) abstraction constitutes the rate-determining step.
Accordingly, we propose an oxidative addition of Cu(I) into
the S–S bond of disulfide as the first step of the catalytic
cycle (Scheme 2).14,15 The resulting intermediate X, formally
corresponding to a Cu(III) compound, subsequently undergoes
a hydrogen transfer, either via a CuH(D) species or, more
5 (a) J. Shearer, C. X. Zhang, L. N. Zakharov, A. L. Rheingold and
K. D. Karlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 5469–5483; (b) for an
elegant, recent case study, see: O. Sander, A. Henss, C. Nather,
¨
C. Wurtele, M. C. Holthausen, S. Schindler and F. Tuczek,
¨
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 9714–9729.
6 P. Chaudhuri, C. N. Verani, E. Bill, E. Bothe, T. Weyhermuller
and K. Wieghardt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 2213–2223.
7 D. Sellman, S. Emig, F. W. Heinemann and F. Knoch, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 276–278.
8 T. Kondo, S.-Y. Uenoyama, K.-I. Fujita and T.-A. Mitsudo,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 482–483.
9 (a) For discussion pertaining to involvement of Cu(III) as an
intermediate in oxidative reaction, see: W. Henze, T. Gartner
and R. M. Gschwind, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
11362–11363; (b) E. R. Bartholomew, S. H. Bertz, S. Cope. M.
Murphy and C. A. Ogle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
11244–11245; (c) T. Gartner, W. Henze and R. M. Gschwind,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 13718–13726; (d) P. Brandt,
M. Sodergren, P. G. Andersson and P.-O. Norrby, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2000, 122, 8013–8020; (e) M. Taki, S. Itoh and S. Fukuzumi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 6203–6204; (f) M. Taki, S. Itoh and
S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 6203–6204.
10 The experiments were performed with a Finnigan LCQ ion-trap
Scheme
2 Tentative mechanism of the Cu(I)-catalyzed imine
oxidation.
mass spectrometer; for
a description of the apparatus, see:
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
3464 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 3463–3465