1236 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 52, No. 6, 2005
Abdel-Gawad et al.
and SXT in a concentration of 30 mg mL-1 and Mycostatine 30
mg mL-1 were used as a reference for antibacterial and anti-
fungal activities, respectively. The minimal inhibitory con-
centration (MIC) of the biologically active compounds was
measured by a two fold serial dilution method. The data ob-
tained are summarized in Table 2. The quinoline derivative
6a containing 2,4-difluorophenyl in position four, quinoline
derivative 10 having thiourea and 3-bromophenyl moieties
and quinolinopyrimidine derivative 11 containing thioxo
moiety and cyclo derivative 18 were found to be the most ac-
tive compounds against Saccharomyces Cerevisiae, whereas
compounds 6a, 8 and 18 showed a moderate activity against
Staphylococcus aureus (29213). From these results it can be
concluded that the biologically active compounds 6a, 10, 11
and 18 (MIC values were < 50 mg/mL) are nearly as active as
the standared Mycostatine.
ment of Drug Radiation Research, National Center for Radia-
tion Research and Technology, Cairo, Egypt, for doing the
antimicrobial activity of some synthesized compounds.
Received October 13, 2004.
REFERENCES
1. Ghorab, M. M.; Heiba, H. I.; Amin, N. E. Pharmazie 1999,
54(3), 226.
2. Suman, M.; Jayanti, P. B.; Bahagwan, R. P.; Krishna, P. B.;
Surendra, S. P. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1980, 17, 1213.
3. Ghorab, M. M.; Abdel-Hamide, S. G.; Farrag, H. A. Acta
Poloniae Pharmaceutica – Drug Research 2001, 58(3), 175.
4. Fadda, A. A.; Khalil, A. M.; El-Habbal, M. M. J. Indian
Chem. 1991, 68, 393.
5. Abdel Hafez, A. A; Kamal, E. A.; Hassan, A. A.; El-Kashef,
H. S.; Rault, S.; Robba, M. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1996, 33,
431.
6. Harrison, I. T.; Lewis, B.; Nelson, P.; Rooks, W.;
Roszkowski, A.; Tomolouis, A.; Fried, J. H. J. Med. Chem.
1970, 13, 203.
7. Boess, C.; Bogl, K. W. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1996, 22, 495.
8. Ciranni; Signoretti, E.; Onori, S.; Valvo, L.; Fattibene, P.;
Savella, A. L.; Desena, C.; Alimonti, S. Drug Dev. Ind.
Pharm. 1993, 19.
9. Jacobs, G. P. J. Biomed. Appl. 1995, 10, 59.
10. Miyazaki, T.; Kaneko, T.; Yoshimura, T.; Crucq, A. S;
Tilquin, B. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 68.
11. Ghorab, M. M.; Abdel-Gawad, S. M.; El-Gaby, M. S. A. IL
Farmaco 2000, 55, 249.
12. El-Gaby, M. S. A.; Ghorab, M. M.; Abdel-Gawad, S. M.
Acta Pharm. 1999, 49, 266.
13. El-Gaby, M. S. A.; Hussein, A. M.; Abu-Shanab, F. A.;
Abdel Rahmeim, M. Afinidad 2003, 60(506), 358.
14. El-Gaby, M. S. A. Afinidad 2003, 60(504), 192.
15. Abdel-Gawad, S. M.; El-Gaby, M. S. A.; Ghorab, M. M., IL
Farmaco 2000, 55, 287.
16. El-Gaby, M. S. A. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2004, 51(1), 125.
17. Basly, J. P.; Basly, I.; Bernard, M. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1999,
75(2), 259-263.
RADIOSTABILITY OF THE BIOLOGICALLY
ACTIVE COMPOUNDS
The aim of the present work is to investigate the stabil-
ity of the chemical structure of the biologically active com-
pounds 6a, 10 and 11 after irradiation. These compounds, in
the dry state, were exposed to doses of gamma irradiation
ranging from 5-40 KGy. Ultraviolet measurements (UV spec-
tra) and thin layer chromatography (TLC) were run before
and after irradiation to probe any change after irradiation.
The UV spectra of unirradiated (control) and irradiated com-
pounds in DMF as solvent are listed in Table 3. The results
showed that all of the biologically active compounds 6a, 10
and 11 remain radioresistant, retaining their structure un-
changed up to 40 KGy (Table 3).
Further, thin layer chromatographic analyses (Rf) were
made on precoated silica gel G sheets 1B-F and were detected
by use of a UV Lamp at 254 nm. The Rf values of the un-
irradiated compounds 6a, 10 and 11 were 0.37, 0.46 and 0.39,
respectively [eluent benzene/ethylacetate 8.5/1.5]. After irra-
diation, the irradiated compounds gave identical Rf values as
before irradiation. This means that the structures of these
compounds remain radioresistant, and sterilization of these
compounds in dry form by gamma irradiation may prove to
be applicable.
18. Basly, J. P.; Basly, I.; Bernard, M. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1998,
74(4), 521-528.
19. Kuehne, M. E. Synthesis 1970, 510.
20. Goerdeler, J.; Pohland, H. Chem. Ber. 1963, 96, 526-533.
21. Pulakiyoti, B.; Romesh, C.; Jagir, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
568-571.
22. Reeves, D. S.; White, L. O. Principles of methods of assay-
ing antibiotics in pharmaceutical microbiology; 3rd ed.,
Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, 1983, pp. 140-
162.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Many thanks are due to Prof. Dr. A. I. El. Batal Depart-