3506
J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3506-3510
Solven t Effects in th e Regio- a n d Dia ster eoselective Ep oxid a tion s
of Acyclic Allylic Alcoh ols by Dim eth yld ioxir a n e: Hyd r ogen
Bon d in g a s Evid en ce for a Dip ola r Tr a n sition Sta te
Waldemar Adam and Alexander K. Smerz*
Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Wu¨rzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wu¨rzburg, Germany
Received November 8, 1995X
A mechanistically significant solvent effect is observed in the regioselectivity of the geraniol
epoxidation by dimethyldioxirane. In hydrogen-bonding solvents (MeOH), the 6,7-epoxide is
preferred over the 2,3-epoxide (74:26), which reveals that the more nucleophilic 6,7 double bond
(the 2,3 double bond is inductively deactivated by the allylic hydroxy group) is preferentially attacked
by the electrophilic dimethyldioxirane. In MeOH, both regioisomeric dipolar transition states are
equally well stabilized by interaction through intermolecular hydrogen bonding with solvent
molecules. In the nonpolar CCl4, intramolecular hydrogen bonding with the allylic hydroxy
functionality favors attack at the 2,3 double bond and proportionally more 2,3-epoxide is formed.
Similarly, also the π-facial selectivity in the dimethyldioxirane epoxidation of methyl-substituted
chiral acyclic allylic alcohols is controlled by intermolecular versus intramolecular hydrogen bonding.
Thus, higher threo selectivities are obtained in the nonpolar CCl4 by stabilization of the
diastereomeric transition state with minimal allylic strain through intramolecular hydrogen bonding
with the allylic hydroxy group. The geometry of the dipolar transition state for the dimethyldiox-
irane epoxidations is similar to that of m-CPBA, but with apparently a slightly larger (ca. 130°)
dihedral angle R to relieve 1,2-allylic strain.
In tr od u ction
oxidizing agent proceeds through a spiro rather than a
planar butterfly transition state.5 The electronic nature
of the transition state still remains unclear, i.e., whether
the epoxidation is synchronous or whether some dipolar
character applies. Also the possibility of a bona fide
diradical process, which was proposed already in early
investigations on dioxiranes,6 was again invoked.7
For some time it has been recognized that the hydroxy
group directs the π-facial selectivity in the epoxidation
of allylic alcohols for a variety of oxidizing agents,1
provided the substrate possesses allylic strain.2 Such
stereochemical studies have revealed valuable mecha-
nistic information on the transition state geometry of
oxygen transfer processes. Particularly informative have
been, for example, m-CPBA and vanadium-catalyzed
epoxidations, in which the oxidant associates in different
ways with the hydroxy functionality, i.e., through hy-
drogen bonding with m-CPBA versus metal-alkoxide bond
formation for vanadium.3 As a consequence of the
domination of 1,3-allylic strain (A1,3) for m-CPBA versus
1,2-allylic strain (A1,2) for vanadium in the highly ordered
associate, the π-facial selectivity in the epoxide formation
of a chiral allylic alcohol possessing either strain is
opposite for the two oxidants, namely, threo for m-CPBA
versus erythro for vanadium. This change has been
ascribed to differing dihedral angles R in the associate
of the allylic substrate and oxygen transfer agent in the
transition state, in particular ca. 120° for m-CPBA and
ca. 50° for the vanadium/tBuOOH system.
Recently it was found that these epoxidations can be
assisted through polar solvents, as demonstrated by
kinetic experiments.8 Partial charge separation was
proposed in the dimethyldioxirane epoxidation, and
hence, the dipolar transition state shown was suggested.
Analogous to the m-CPBA or vanadium-catalyzed epoxi-
dations, a hydroxy-directing effect was expected for DMD
in the oxidation of chiral allylic alcohols which possess
allylic strain, but in acetone/CH2Cl2 (ca. 1:1) as solvent
In this context, only little is known to date on such
hydroxy-directed stereochemical probing in dimethyl-
dioxirane (DMD) chemistry; unquestionably, such infor-
mation should be desirable for stereoselective synthesis
with this now popular oxidant.4 It has been proposed
that the attack on the double bond by this electrophilic
(4) (a) Adam, W.; Curci, R.; Edwards, J . O. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989,
22, 205-211. (b) Murray, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1187-1201. (c)
Curci, R. In Advances in Oxygenated Processes; Baumstark, A. L., Ed.;
J AI: Greenwich, CT, 1990; Vol. 2, Chapter I. (d) Adam, W.; Hadjiara-
poglou, L. P.; Curci, R.; Mello, R. In Organic Peroxides; Ando, W., Ed.;
Wiley, New York, 1992; Chapter 4, pp 195-219. (e) Adam, W.;
Hadjiarapoglou, L. Top. Curr. Chem. 1993, 164, 45-62.
(5) Baumstark, A. L.; McCloskey, C. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28,
3311-3314.
X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, May 1, 1996.
(1) Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93,
1307-1370.
(2) Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1841-1860.
(3) (a) Rossiter, B. E.; Verhoeven, T. R.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1979, 20, 4733-4736. (b) Sharpless, K. B.; Verhoeven, T. R.
Aldrichimica Acta 1979, 12, 63-74. (c) Narula, S. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1981, 22, 2017-2020. (d) Narula, S. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
5579-5582. (e) Itoh, T.; J itsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K.; Teranishi, S. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 159-169. (f) Mihelich, E. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1979, 20, 4729-4732.
(6) (a) Adam, W.; Bottle, S. E.; Mello, R. J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1991, 771-773. (b) Adam, W.; Curci, R.; Gonza´les Nu´n˜es,
M. E.; Mello, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7654-7658.
(7) (a) Minisci, F.; Zhao, L.; Fontana, F.; Bravo, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 1697-1700. (b) Minisci, F.; Zhao, L.; Fontana, F.; Bravo, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1895-1898. (c) Bravo, A.; Fontana, F.;
Fronza, G.; Mele, A.; Minisci, F. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
1573-1574. (d) Bravo, A.; Fontana, F.; Fronza, G.; Minisci, F.; Serri,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6945-6948.
(8) Murray, R. W.; Gu, D. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993,
2203-2207.
S0022-3263(95)01984-0 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society