N. C. Ross et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 5020–5023
5023
11. (a) Pastuszak, J.; Gardner, J. H.; Singh, J.; Rich, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47,
2982–2987; (b) Schmidt, U.; Beutler, U.; Lieberknecht, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1989, 28, 333–334; (c) Mou, L.; Singh, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6603–
6606; (d) Meutermans, W. D.; Bourne, G. T.; Golding, S. W.; Horton, D. A.;
Campitelli, M. R.; Craik, D.; Scanlon, M.; Smythe, M. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2711–
2714.
Laboratory for his assistance with the ESI spectra and Wendy
Hartsock for her assistance with HPLC and for preparation of the
manuscript.
Supplementary data
12. Taunton, J.; Collins, J. L.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10412–
10422.
13. (a) Cavelier-Frontin, F.; Pepe, G.; Verducci, J.; Siri, D.; Jacquier, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 8885–8890; (b) Besser, D.; Olender, R.; Rosenfeld, R.; Arad, O.;
Reissmann, S. J. Pept. Res. 2000, 56, 337–345.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
14. The linear precursors were constructed and minimized using the Tripos force
field in SYBYL7.0 (Tripos, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Electrostatic charges were
generated using the Gasteiger and Marsili method within SYBYL; an 8Å non-
bonded cut-off was employed and a dielectric constant of 4 was applied for
References and notes
1. (a) Metcalf, M. D.; Coop, A. AAPS J. 2005, 7, E704–E722; (b) Aldrich, J. V.;
McLaughlin, J. P. AAPS J. 2009, 11, 312–322.
2. Aldrich, J. V.; Vigil-Cruz, S. C.. In Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry & Drug Discovery;
Abraham, D. J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2003; Vol. 6, pp 329–481.
3. Aldrich, J. V.; Patkar, K. A.; McLaughlin, J. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106,
18396–18401.
minimizations.
A three-step minimization protocol, consisting of steepest
decent gradient (100 iterations), conjugate gradient (10,000 iterations) and
then a BFGS gradient minimization with convergence criterion of 0.001 kcal/
mol, was utilized to obtain convergence.
15. Chan, W. C.; White, P. D. Fmoc Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis:
Approach; Oxford University Press: New York, 2000. pp. 41–76.
A Practical
4. Gilon, C.; Halle, D.; Chorev, M.; Selinger, Z.; Byk, G. Biopolymers 1991, 31, 745–
750.
16. The yields of cyclic tetrapeptide and cyclic octapeptide measured by HPLC
analysis following rapid addition were 28% and 44%, respectively.
17. The crude linear peptide (50 mg, 0.072 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added
dropwise at a rate of 1.6 mL/h (using a KD Scientific single infusion syringe
5. (a) Closse, A.; Huguenin, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1974, 57, 533–545; (b) Itazaki, H.;
Nagashima, K.; Sugita, K.; Yoshida, H.; Kawamura, Y.; Yasuda, Y.; Matsumoto,
K.; Ishii, K.; Uotani, N.; Nakai, H.; Terui, A.; Yoshimatsu, S.; Ikenishi, Y.;
Nakagawa, Y. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1990, 43, 1524–1532; (c) Singh, S. B.; Zink, D.
L.; Polishook, J. D.; Dombrowski, A. W.; Darkin-Rattray, S. J.; Schmatz, D. M.;
Goetz, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8077–8080; (d) Mori, H.; Urano, Y.;
Kinoshita, T.; Yoshimura, S.; Takase, S.; Hino, M. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2003, 56,
181–185.
6. Saito, T.; Hirai, H.; Kim, Y. J.; Kojima, Y.; Matsunaga, Y.; Nishida, H.; Sakakibara,
T.; Suga, O.; Sujaku, T.; Kojima, N. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2002, 55, 847–854.
7. Seale, P. W.; Stead, P.; Jaxa-Chamiec, A. In Peptides 2000; Martinez, J., Fehrentz,
J. A., Eds.; EDK: Paris, France, 2001; pp 271–272.
8. Preliminary results were presented at the 20th American Peptide Symposium,
Montreal, Canada. Kulkarni, S. S.; Ross, N. C.; McLaughlin, J. P.; Aldrich, J. V. Adv.
Exp. Med. Biol. 2009, 611, 269–270.
9. (a) Schmidt, U.; Langner, J. J. Pept. Res. 1997, 49, 67–73; (b) Davies, J. S. J. Pept.
Sci. 2003, 9, 471–501.
pump) to
a solution of HATU (46 mg, 0.12 mmol) and DIEA (0.10 mL,
0.58 mmol) in DMF (150 mL) over 6 h. After 6 h a second portion of HATU
(46 mg, 0.12 mmol) was added to the reaction in one portion, and additional
linear peptide (50 mg, 0.072 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added dropwise at a
rate of 1.6 mL/h as described above. The reaction was then allowed to stir at
room temperature for an additional 12–24 h, and the solvent evaporated.
Following dissolution in EtOAc or DCM, the solution was washed (with 2 N
citric acid, sat bicarbonate and brine), dried (MgSO4), and the solvent was
removed to give the crude cyclic peptide.
18. ESI-MS (M+Na)+ = 600.2566 (calcd 600.2587); HPLC: tR = 26.0 min (30–70%
aqueous MeOH over 40 min starting after 1 min, flow rate 0.8 mL/min).
19. ESI-MS (M+Na)+ = 600.2345 (calcd 600.2587); HPLC: tR = 35.5 min.
20. Albericio, F.; Bofill, J. M.; El-Faham, A.; Kates, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9678–
9683.
21. Dolle, R. E.; Michaut, M.; Martinez-Teipel, B.; Seida, P. R.; Ajello, C. W.; Muller,
A. L.; DeHaven, R. N.; Carroll, P. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3647–3650.
10. (a) El Haddadi, M.; Cavelier, F.; Vives, E.; Azmani, A.; Verducci, J.; Martinez, J. J.
Pept. Sci. 2000, 6, 560–570; (b) Berst, F.; Ladlow, M.; Holmes, A. B. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 508–509.