10.1002/ejoc.201701566
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
O
O
OH
O
Ehtyl propiolate
n-BuLi
On the basis of the results described in scheme 2, we
postulate a mechanism for the sequential rearrangement from
alkynol to product 20 (Scheme 3). The pyridine within the
product abstracts 4-H from 23 affording cumulene 24, which is
protonated at C2 by reaction with the protonated base to form
allenoate (D)-25. This is supported by the observed deuterium at
this position and the mechanism here is consistent with that
suggested previously by Koide. In the following step, the
formation of aldol compound (D)-21 confirmed reaction of
aldehyde with the intermediate (D)-25 at C3. These results also
rule out any aldol reaction of cumulene 24 at C2 with aldehyde.
The second rearrangement occurs after work up presumably
through the deprotonation of (D)-21 at the picolinic position
facilitated by resonance with the pyridine ring.
H
H
CO2Et
+
+
THF
-78 °C
N
CO2Et
N
26
3
Scheme 4. Cross-over reaction with benzaldehyde.
Conclusions
In summary, we have shown that the alkynylation of azaaryl
aldehydes with ethyl propiolate generated propargylic alcohols
which isomerized spontaneously into corresponding enones. We
have gained significant mechanistic insight based on isotope
labeling and were able to provide evidence for the putative
allenolate intermediate by trapping it in an aldol-type reaction.
The presence of the base within the alkynol product is crucial for
the rearrangement, making the process autocatalytic. The
conceptual novelty of this work could be integrated as a key step
in related synthetic applications.
Abstraction of 4-H may also be effected by Me2Zn or BuLi.
However, this probability is ruled out on the basis of the
observations made in scheme 2 and 3. Such transfer of
deuterium atom from C4 to C2 would not be possible in such an
irreversible process with
a carbon base. To probe the
autocatalytic mechanism a crossover reaction was devised. If
this hypothesis is correct and the pyridine ring within the alkynol
is the base, the isomerization may occur preferentially with
resulting pyridine propargylic alcohol. Thus, an equimolar
mixture of pyridine-4-carboxaldehyde and benzaldehyde was
treated with an excess of nucleophilic ethyl propiolate. In
Experimental Section
See supporting information.
contrast
to
pyridine-2-carboxaldehyde,
pyridine-4-
Acknowledgements
carboxaldehyde has a more exposed N-atom and can act as a
base by itself, but also in the product by preventing an
intramolecular coordination in the metallated alkylol. Surprisingly,
we isolated (E)-enone 3 derived from pyridine-4-carboxaldehyde
along with unmodified alkynol 26 (Scheme 4). This indicates that
the pyridine in neither the aldehyde nor the alkynol/enone is able
to effect the deprotonation of 26. Again, remaining BuLi if any
did not initiate isomerization of 26. Thus, the absence of
This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway
(FRIPRO grant 205271), the University of Oslo, and COST
Action “Emergence and Evolution of Complex Chemical
Systems” (CM 1304).
Keywords: Alkyne addition • Raphael isomerisation • Enone
isomerization with 26 is consistent with
a
self-induced
esters • Rearrangement • Synthetic methods.
isomerization into enone 3 presumably by formation of a homo-
complex of pyridine-alkynols.
[12] G. Lu, Y.-M. Li, X.-S. Li, A. S. C. Chan, Coordination Chemistry
Reviews 2005, 249, 1736-1744.
References
[13] B. M. Trost, A. H. Weiss, A. Jacobi von Wangelin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 128, 8-9.
[1]
S. Florio, L. Troisi, V. Capriati, G. Suppa, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
3793-3797.
[14] S. Niwa, K. Soai, Journal of the Chemical Society-Perkin Transactions
1 1990, 937-943.
[2]
[3]
M. Y. Chen, J. M. Fang, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2937-2941.
N. Chinkov, A. Warm, E. M. Carreira, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
2957-2961.
[15] L. Pu, Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9873-9886.
[16] R. Alibes, F. Busque, P. de March, M. Figueredo, J. Font, T. Parella,
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 10857-10878.
[4]
[5]
N. Cohen, W. F. Eichel, R. J. Lopresti, C. Neukom, G. Saucy, J. Org.
Chem. 1976, 41, 3512-3515.
[17] P. de March, L. Elias, M. Figueredo, J. Font, Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
2667-2672.
B. M. Trost, B. M. O’Boyle, D. Hund, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
15061-15074.
[18] S. Swaminathan, K. V. Narayanan, Chemical Reviews 1971, 71, 429-
438.
[6]
[7]
[8]
B. M. Trost, A. H. Weiss, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4461-4464.
B. M. Trost, A. H. Weiss, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7664-7666.
T. Mukaiyama, K. Suzuki, K. Soai, T. Sato, Chemistry Letters 1979, 8,
447-448.
[19] V. Cadierno, P. Crochet, S. E. Garcia-Garrido, J. Gimeno, Dalton Trans
2010, 39, 4015-4031.
[20] A. W. Nineham, R. A. Raphael, J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 118.
[21] J. P. Sonye, K. Koide, Synthetic Communications 2006, 36, 599-602.
[22] J. P. Sonye, K. Koide, J Org Chem 2007, 72, 1846-1848.
[23] J. P. Sonye, K. Koide, J Org Chem 2006, 71, 6254-6257.
[24] J. P. Sonye, K. Koide, Organic Letters 2006, 8, 199-202.
[25] C. Cho, Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society 2005, 26, 1107-1108.
[26] Y. Yue, X. Q. Yu, L. Pu, Chemistry 2009, 15, 5104-5107.
[9]
S. Niwa, K. Soai, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 937-943.
[10] B. M. Trost, A. H. Weiss, Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2009, 351,
963-983.
[11] G. Lu, X. Li, X. Jia, W. L. Chan, A. S. C. Chan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 5057-5058.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.