2184
M.T. Hay et al. / Polyhedron 28 (2009) 2183–2186
(KBr,
m
(cmꢀ1)): 3137w, 3071s, 3049s, 2965s, 2931s, 2874s,
Cl
Fe
R
O
2719w, 1961m, 1891m, 1824m, 1776m, 1593s, 1480s, 1431s,
1381s, 1068vs, 879s, 744vs, 694vs, 645s, 594m, 551s.
Si
O
NBu4+
O
R
O
O
O
R
Si
Si
R
O
Si
Si O
O
O
R
O
2.3.2. Compound 4
Yield: 73.8%. Anal. Calc. for C51H99FeClNO12Si7 (1206.24): C,
50.78; H, 8.27; N, 1.16. Found: C, 50.61; H, 8.72; N, 1.26%. IR
Si
Si
O
R
R
m
(cmꢀ1)): 2948vs, 2864s, 1481m, 1471m, 1454m, 1383m,
Fig. 1. Iron (III) chloro-POSS compounds, R = isobutyl- (1), ethyl- (2), phenyl- (3),
and cyclopentyl- (4)
(KBr,
1243s, 1099vs, 1040vs, 943s, 906w, 736m, 496vs.
H
H
H
O
O
O
H
Air and 1
H
H
2.4. X-ray analysis of iron (III) chloro-POSS compounds
H
C
C
C
H
C
C
C
C
H
C
H
H
H
Crystallization of
2 from a minimum amount of toluene
H
H
afforded yellow crystals of 2. C30H71ClFeNO12Si7, M = 925.81,
monoclinic space group, P21/c, a = 9.8962(5), b = 29.5660(15),
THF
GBL
c = 16.1237(8) Å, b = 90.7710(10)o, V = 4717.2(4) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalc
=
Reaction 1. Oxidation of tetrahydrofuran to c-butyrolactone.
1.302 Mg/m3; F(0 0 0) = 1976,
l
Mo = 0.422 mmꢀ1; crystal dimen-
sions: 0.32 ꢁ 0.28 ꢁ 0.25 mm. The structure was solved via direct
methods. Least-squares refinement on F2 using all reflections con-
verged to RF2 ¼ 15:29%. One of the ethyl methylene carbons was
disordered 50:50 over two sites.
at 150 K on a Bruker Apex CCD diffractometer (sealed-tube Mo
radiation) which is controlled via Bruker Smart software. Trisila-
nolethyl-POSS, (CH3CH2)7Si7O12H3, the trisilanolphenyl-POSS,
(C6H5)7Si7O12H3, and the trisilanolcyclopentyl-POSS, (cyclo-C5H9)7-
Si7O12H3 were all obtained from Hybrid Plastics or as a gift from
Dr. Andre Lee from Michigan State University and used as received.
Triethylamine, anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF), c-butyrolactone
(GBL), and dodecane were all obtained from Sigma–Aldrich chem-
ical and used as received. Compound 1 was synthesized as de-
Crystallization of
3 from a minimum amount of toluene
afforded yellow crystals of 3. C58H71ClFeNO12Si7–2(C6H5CH3),
M = 1446.36, monoclinic space group, P21/n, a = 15.079(3),
b = 20.224(4), c = 25.423(4) Å, b = 100.642(4)o, V = 7619(2) Å3,
Z = 4, Dcalc = 1.261 Mg/m3; F(0 0 0) = 3052,
l ;
Mo = 0.401 mmꢀ1
crystal dimensions: 0 0.22 ꢁ 0.34 ꢁ 0.35 mm. The structure was
solved via direct methods. Least-squares refinement on F2 using
all reflections converged to RF2 ¼ 27:52%. There are two toluene
solvate molecules per asymmetric unit which were constrained
to fit approximately rigid hexagons. The crystal was very weakly
diffracting which caused problems in the refinement including
poorly shaped ADP’s, unexpected variations in Ueq values, and
some atypical bond lengths. These problems are noted in the
checkcif report. Crystallization of 4 from a minimum amount of
toluene afforded yellow crystals of 4. C51H99ClFeNO12Si7,
M = 1206.24, monoclinic space group, P21/c, a = 15.4303(16),
b = 22.127(2), c = 40.539(4) Å, b = 93.408(2)°, V = 13817(2) Å3,
scribed in the literature [16]. Compound
according to the literature procedure [17].
5 was prepared
2.2. Synthesis of compound 2
A colorless solution of the trisilanol-POSS, (CH3CH2)7Si7O12H3,
(0.200 g, 0.336 mmol) in toluene (4.0 mL) was treated with 3 equiv.
of triethylamine (141 lL, 1.01 mmol). The mixture was stirred for
5 min at room temperature before 1 equiv. of solid 5 (0.148 g,
0.336 mmol) was added. The yellow solid did not immediately dis-
solve. After stirring for 10 min, the solution had turned yellow and
a precipitate had formed. A white precipitate was collected by fil-
tration. The yellow filtrate was concentrated in vacuo giving a yel-
low oil, which was then extracted with acetonitrile. A majority of
the yellow oil dissolved except for a small amount of insoluble
white precipitate. These were removed by filtration, and the fil-
trate was concentrated in vacuo to give yellow crystalline material,
which was then extracted with toluene and then concentrated in
vacuo to afford a yellow powder after being dried under vacuum.
Z = 8, Dcalc = 1.159 Mg/m3; F(0 0 0) = 5192,
l ;
Mo = 0.428 mmꢀ1
crystal dimensions: 0.21 ꢁ 0.28 ꢁ 0.34 mm. The structure was
solved via direct
methods. Least-squares refinement on F2 using all reflections con-
verged to RF2 ¼ 23:54%. Crystals diffracted very weakly which
caused problems in the refinement including poorly shaped ADP’s,
unexpected variations in Ueq values, and some atypical bond
lengths. These problems are noted in the checkcif report. One of
the cyclopentyl groups was disordered over two 50% occupancy
orientations.
2.2.1. Compound 2
Yield: 83.9%. Anal. Calc. for C30H71FeClNO12Si7 (925.81): C,
38.92; H, 7.73; N, 1.51. Found: C, 38.89; H, 7.63; N, 1.54%. IR
(KBr,
m
(cmꢀ1)): 2967s, 2877s, 1481m, 1461m, 1415w, 1383w,
1252s, 1086vs, 940s, 881m, 753s, 696vs, 492s, 458s.
2.5. Aerobic oxidation of the tetrahydrofuran
2.3. Synthesis of compounds 3 and 4
In a 10-mL micro-scale round bottom flask, 0.0500 mol% of the
iron complex was dissolved in 2.00 mL of THF. The resulting solu-
tion was golden yellow. Three stacked micro-scale water con-
densers were added to the round bottom flask to prevent
evaporation of the solvent. The mixture was stirred for 5 days
at room temperature. Afterwards, the reaction mixture was ana-
lysed by infrared spectroscopy (IR) and gas chromatography
(GC). Dodecane was used as an internal standard during the GC
analysis, and the turnover number from four separate trials were
averaged to give the reported values. On separate occasions, sim-
ilar reaction mixtures were analysed by gas chromatography–
Compounds 3 and 4 were prepared following a procedure anal-
ogous to the synthesis of 2. Similar molar quantities of the appro-
priate trisilanol-POSS were used, but due to their lower solubility
in toluene, twice the volume of solvent was used as well as longer
reaction times were necessary.
2.3.1. Compound 3
Yield: 82.2%. Anal. Calc. for C58H71FeClNO12Si7 (1262.09): C,
55.19; H, 5.67; N, 1.11. Found: C, 55.12; H, 5.49; N, 1.12%. IR