A R T I C L E S
Lee et al.
Scheme 1. Lewis Base Activation in Cu-Based and Cu-Free
Pathways to Catalytic Allylic Alkylation
resulting in alkylation of the substrate via Wi (Scheme 1) and
precluding the need for a Cu salt or a Cu-based complex.
Association of the leaving group (LG), typically a Lewis basic
entity, with the Lewis acidic metal center should might facilitate
the alkylation process (see Wi).
We recently demonstrated the validity of the latter approach
through development of a class of reactions that involves
γ-chloro-R,ꢀ-unsaturated esters as substrates, a chiral NHC as
the catalyst and alkylmagnesium halide reagents.3 We have
illustrated that, in the absence of a Cu salt, NHC-Mg-catalyzed
reactions proceed to afford products bearing an all-carbon
quaternary stereogenic center12 with moderate to high site- (78:
22-93:7 SN2′:SN2) and enantioselectivity (81.5:18.5-99:1 er);
an example is illustrated in eq 1. In comparison, as depicted in
eq 2, in the presence of a Cu salt (CuCl2•2H2O), catalyst
turnover frequency is higher (0.5 mol % catalyst in 0.5 h vs 5
mol % in 24 h) and the transformation proceeds with similar
enantioselectivity. The desired chiral products, however, are
usually obtained in lower yields, partly due to inferior site-
selectivity, as demonstrated by the representative processes
shown (eq 1-2). Cu-free catalytic enantioselective allylic
Zn- or Al-based reagents.10 Such transformations often require
the presence of an additional Cu-based salt. Thus, it is often a
chiral Cu catalyst, generated in situ, which promotes C-C bond
formation (see top pathway in Scheme 1). The higher activity
of chiral Cu-based complexes, versus when only metal salts are
used or in reactions where only an organometallic reagent is
present (C-M in Scheme 1), is due to the activation provided
by one or more Lewis basic ligands11 that are bound to the
transition metal (i and ii, Scheme 1). The donor ligands (LB in
Scheme 1) raise the nucleophilicity of the Cu-bound carbon (ii),
while enhancing the π-Lewis acidicity of the transition metal
(Lewis base activation of a Lewis acid). The above factors
collectively translate into a highly effective alkylating agent (cf.
conversion of iii to iW and the alkylation product in Scheme 1).
An alternative strategy, also illustrated in Scheme 1 (bottom
pathway), involves direct actiVation of the organometallic
reagent by a nucleophilic Lewis base (W, Scheme 1). That is,
association of the Lewis basic catalyst (LB) with the Mg-, Zn-
or Al-based alkylating agent (C-M) might lead to its activation
in the same manner as described above for the Cu-based system,
(7) For applications of chiral bidentate NHC-Cu complexes to enanti-
oselective conjugate addition reactions, see: (a) Arnold, P. L.; Rodden,
M.; Davis, K. M.; Scarisbrick, A. C.; Blake, A. J.; Wilson, C. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 1612–1613. (b) Lee, K.-S.; Brown, M. K.; Hird,
A. W.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7182–7184. (c)
Clavier, H.; Coutable, L.; Toupet, L.; Guillemin, J.-C.; Mauduit, M.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 5237–5254. (d) Brown, M. K.; May,
T. L.; Baxter, C. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 1097–1100. (e) Martin, D.; Kehrli, S.; d’Augustin, M.; Clavier,
H.; Mauduit, M.; Alexakis, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8416–
8417. (f) May, T. L.; Brown, M. K.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7358–7362. (g) Brown, M. K.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12904–12906.
(8) For a recent review on bifunctional enantioselective catalysis, see:
(a) Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4566–
4583. (b) Na´jera, C.; Sansano, J. M.; Saa´, J. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 2385–2400. For additional examples of bifunctional enantiose-
lective catalysis, see: (c) Kacprzynski, M. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10676–10681. (d) Kanai, M.; Kato, N.;
Ichikawa, E.; Shibasaki, M. Synlett 2005, 1491–1508. (e) Carswell,
E. L.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7230–7233. (f) Paull, D. H.; Abraham, C. J.; Scerba, M. T.; Alden-
Danforth, E.; Lectka, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 655–663. (g) Friel,
D. K.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
9942–9951.
alkylation (EAA) reactions, unlike those performed in the
presence of a Cu salt,6 are inefficient and proceed with little or
no site- or enantioselectivity with substrates that lack a
carboxylic ester group; the example depicted in eq 3 is
representative.
On the basis of the above findings, we designed experiments
that offer insight regarding the structural attributes of non-Cu-
based chiral NHC-metal complexes and their ability to promote
(9) ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A.,
Yamamoto, H., Eds; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999.
(10) For reviews on catalytic allylic alkylation reactions that involve “hard”
alkyl- or arylmetal-based reagents, see: (a) Hoveyda, A. H.; Hird,
A. W.; Kacprzynski, M. A. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1779–1785. (b)
Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4435–
4439. (c) Falciola, C. A.; Alexakis, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 3765–
3780.
(11) For a review on Lewis base catalysis, see: Denmark, S. E.; Beutner,
G. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1560–1638.
(12) Quaternary Stereocenters: Challenges and Solutions for Organic
Synthesis; Christophers, J., Baro, A., Eds; Wiley-VCH: Wenheim,
2006.
9
11626 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 32, 2009