Figure 4. TEM images of SUVs with 6f; (a) Untreated EYPC/EYPG; (b)
EYPC/EYPG treated with 6f; (c) Untreated EYPC/cholesterol; (d)
EYPC/cholesterol treated with 6f. The peptide was used at 10 µg/mL
concentrations.
5. Jarvis, J. N.; Boulle, A.; Loyse, A.; Bicanic, T.; Rebe, K.; Williams, A.;
Harrison, T. S.; Meintjes, G. AIDS (London, England) 2009, 23, 1182-
1183.
6. Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention
7. Harrison, T. S. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 48, 1784-1786.
8. Pathak, A.; Pien, F. D.; Carvalho, L. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998, 26, 334-338.
9. Schwarz, P.; Dromer, F.; Lortholary, O.; Dannaoui, E. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 113-120.
From TEM study, we observed the morphology of the SUVs in
the presence and absence of the peptide 6f by depositing a sample
of the treated and untreated SUVs, on to a carbon coated copper
grid, and negatively staining the sample with 2% (w/v)
phosphotungstic acid solution. The results indicated that the
untreated SUVs were uniformly shaped, with intact morphology
(Fig. 4a) whereas SUVs treated with 6f resulted in the destruction
of morphology (Fig. 4b), in case of EYPC/EYPG. Whereas in
case of EYPC/cholesterol, the SUVs treated with 6f retains the
integrity of membrane (Fig. 4d). From these studies, we conclude
that the peptide does not lyse mammalian membranes at the
concentrations, at which it destroys mimic of the pathogenic
membranes further confirming the results of cytotoxicity
experiments.
In summary, two series of synthetic histidine-rich
tripeptidomimetics with varying lipophilicity were synthesized
and evaluated in vitro against fungal and bacterial strains.
Peptides 6f and 10f substituted with a bulky adamantan-1-yl
group at the C-2-position of the imidazole ring were found to be
the most active against C. neoformans. To study the interaction
of these peptides, tryptophan fluorescence quenching and TEM
studies were performed using synthetic mimics of membrane.
The results indicate that tested peptides possibly interact with
membrane, followed by the non-specific disruption of the cell
membrane.
10. Denning, D. W. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 889-891.
11. Leonard, W. R.; Belyk, K. M.; Conlon, D. A.; Bender, D. R.; DiMichele,
L. M.; Liu, J.; Hughes, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2335-2343.
12. Maligie, M. A.; Selitrennikoff, C. P. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
2005, 49, 2851-2856.
13. Zasloff, M. Nature 2002, 415, 389-395.
14. Theis, T.; Stahl, U. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.2004, 61, 437-455.
15. Hegedüs, N.; Marx, F. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2013, 26, 132-145.
16. Ribeiro, S. M.; Porto, W. F.; Silva, O. N.; Santos, Mde. O.; Dias, S. C.;
Franco, O. L. In Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides; Kastin, A. J.;
Academic Press: Waltham, Massachusetts, 2013; pp 169-179.
17. Morton, C. O.; Hayes, A.; Wilson, M.; Rash, B. M.; Oliver, S. G.; Coote,
P. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3948-3959.
18. Ganz, T. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 710-720.
19. Douglas, C. M. Med. Mycol. 2001, 39, 55-66.
20. Sharma, R. K.; Reddy, R. P.; Tegge, W.; Jain, R. J. Med. Chem. 2009,
52, 7421-7431.
21. Mahindra, A.; Bagra, N.; Wangoo, N.; Khan, S. I.; Jacob, M. R.; Jain, R.
ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, (DOI: 10.1021/ml500011v).
22. Matejuk, A.; Leng, Q.; Begum, M. D.; Woodle, M. C.; Scaria, P.; Chou,
S. T.; Mixson, A. J. Drugs Future 2010, 35, 197.
23. Helmerhorst, E. J.; Van't Hof, W.; Veerman, E. C.; Simoons-Smit, I.;
Nieuw Amerongen, A. V.; Biochem. J. 1997, 326, 39-45.
24. Schibli, D. J.; Epand, R. F.; Vogel, H. J.; Epand, R. M. Biochem. Cell
Biol. 2002, 80, 667-677.
25. Oppenheim, F. G.; Xu, T.; McMillian, F. M.; Levitz, S. M.; Diamond, R.
D.; Offner, G. D.; Troxler, R. F. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 7472-7477.
26. Raj, P. A.; Edgerton, M.; Levine, M. J. J. Biol. Chem.1990, 265, 3898-
3905.
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: rahuljain@niper.ac.in; Fax: +91 (172) 2214692; Tel:
+91 (172) 2292024.
27. Rothstein, D. M.; Spacciapoli, P.; Tran, L. T.; Xu, T.; Roberts, F. D.;
Dalla Serra, M.; Buxton, D. K.; Oppenheim, F. G.; Friden, P. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1367-1373.
Acknowledgments
28. Zhu, J.; Luther, P. W.; Leng, Q.; Mixson, A. J. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2006, 50, 2797-2805.
Amit Mahindra thanks the Council of Scientific and
IndustrialResearch (CSIR), New Delhi for the award of a Senior
Research Fellowship. Ms Marsha Wright and Mr John Trott are
acknowledged for excellent technical support in biological testing
at NCNPR.Antimicrobial studies were supported by the NIH,
NIAID, Division of AIDS, Grant No. AI 27094 (antifungal) and
the USDA Agricultural Research Service Specific Cooperative
Agreement No. 58-6408-1-603 (antibacterial).
29. Chan, D. I.; Prenner, E. J.; Vogel, H. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) -
Biomembranes 2006, 1758, 1184-1202.
30. Jose, F. M.; Mόnica, G.; Eleonora, H.; Lourdes, C.; Alberto, M. In Small
Wonders: Peptides for Disease Control; American Chemical Society:
Washington D.C., 2012; 1095, pp 337-357.
31. Minoux, H.; Chipot, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10366-10372.
32. Jain, R.; Cohen, L. A.; El-Kadi, N. A.; King, M. M. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 2365-2370.
33. Jain, R.; Cohen, L. A.; King, M. M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4539-4548.
34. Mahindra, A.; Sharma, K. K.; Jain, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 6931-
6935.
Abbreviations
35. Mahindra, A.; Nooney, K.; Uraon, S.; Sharma, K. K.; Jain, R. RSC Adv.
2013, 3, 16810-16816.
36. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of
Yeasts: Approved Standard, 2nd ed.; NCCLS document M27-A2;
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA,
2002.
AA, amino acid; Boc, tert-Butoxycarbonyl; DIC, 1,3-
Diisopropylcarbodiimide; DIEA, N,N-Diisopropylethylamine;
EYPC, Egg yolk L-a-phosphatidylcholine; DMF, N,N-
Dimethylformamide; EYPG, Egg yolk L-a-phosphatidyl-DL-
glycerol; TBTU,
tetramethyluronium
O-(Benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-
tetrafluoroborate; HOBt, 1-
37. Kagan, S.; Ickowicz, D.; Shmuel, M.; Altschuler, Y.; Sionov, E.; Pitusi,
M.; Weiss, A.; Farber, S.; Domb, A. J.; Polacheck, I. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2012, 56, 5603-5611.
Hydroxybenzotriazole; HONB, N-endo-Hydroxy-5-norbornene-
2,3-dicarboximide; IC50, The concentration (µg/mL) that affords
50% inhibition of growth; MeOH, Methanol; MFC/MBC,
38. Borenfreund, E.; Babich, H.; Martin-Alguacil, N. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.
1990, 26, 1030-1034.
39. Eftink, M. R.; Ghiron, C. A. Anal. Biochem. 1981, 114, 199-227.
40. Morrissey, J. H. 2001. Morrissey laboratory protocol for preparing
Minimum
Fungicidal/Bactericidal
Concentration;
MIC,
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; TEM, Transmission electron
microscopy; Trp, Tryptophan.
phospholipid vesicles (SUV) by sonication
http://tf7.org/suv.pdf).
(please see:
References and notes
Supplementary Material
1. Romani, L. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 275-288.
2. Pfaller, M. A.; Pappas, P. G.; Wingard, J. R. Clin Infect Dis.2006, 43,
S3-S14.
Detailed synthetic procedures, characterization data, HPLC
chromatograms and details on the biological assays are available
in supporting information.
3. Rajasingham, R.; Rolfes, M. A.; Birkenkamp, K. E.; Meya, D. B.;
Boulware, D. R. PLOS Medicine 2012, 9, 1-10.
4. Park, B. J.; Wannemuehler, K. A.; Marston, B. J.; Govender, N.; Pappas,
P. G.; Chiller, T. M. AIDS (London, England) 2009, 23, 525-530.