sequence to reveal aldehyde 16. A catalyst-controlled Kiyoo-
ka16 aldol reaction of aldehyde 16 and enolsilane 1717
provided carbinol 18 in 84% yield and 9:1 dr. Protection of
alcohol 18 to give TBS ether 19 was followed by acid-
catalyzed cyclization to provide a 10:1 mixture of lactone
20 and the corresponding diol, which was converted to
lactone 20 by exposure to CF3CO2H. Protection of the
primary alcohol gave benzyl ether 21 and subsequent one-
pot reductive acetylation18 afforded acetate 5 in quantitative
yield (9 steps, 34% overall from 2-deoxy-D-ribose).
Scheme 5. Coupling of Acetate 5 with Enolsilane 6
The synthesis of enolsilane 6 (Scheme 4) began from
known catechol 246,19 prepared by cycloaddition of allene
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Enolsilane 6
enolsilane for the assembly of 5 and 6. Most intriguing,
however, was that addition of a solution of enolsilane 6 to
a premixed solution of 5 and BF3·OEt2 at -40 °C was
required for efficient coupling. The union proceeded with
high diastereoselectivity, giving tetrahydropyran 4 as the only
detectable diastereomer. The high diastereoselectivity can be
rationalized by well precedented23 pseudoaxial addition of
the nucleophile to the oxocarbenium conformer 29, proceed-
ing through a favorable chairlike conformation. Conformer
29 would also be expected to be favored as a result of
through-space stereoelectronic stabilization23 of the oxocar-
benium ion by the axially positioned C11 ether.
With the C8-C25 carbon framework in place, conditions
to set the C15 stereocenter were investigated (Scheme 6).
Standard achiral reducing agents proved to be nonselective
or completely selective for the undesired diastereomer;24
however, the use of the chiral (R)-CBS25 agent exclusively
provided desired diastereomer 3026 in 82% yield. After
protection of the secondary alcohol as its TBS ether and
cleavage of the benzyl ether, carbinol 31 was oxidized over
2 steps to carboxylic acid 32. Initial studies showed the one-
pot Curtius reaction with (O,O)-diphenylphosphoryl azide27
to be ineffective, providing significant quantities of insepa-
rable carbamoyl azide impurity.28 Therefore, Weinstock’s
procedure9,29 was employed to generate the intermediate
isocyanate, which under mild conditions using copper(I)
2320 and diene 22.21 Protection of catechol 24 as the bis-
TIPS ether was followed by selective ester reduction to give
aldehyde 25 in 78% yield over 2 steps. An asymmetric
propionate aldol22 reaction of aldehyde 25 and propionyl
thiazolidinethione 26 afforded the Evans-syn-aldol adduct
27 in 94% yield and >20:1 dr. Direct displacement of the
chiral auxiliary with Weinreb’s amine was followed by
protection of the secondary alcohol as a TBS ether to deliver
silyl ether 28. The methyl ketone prepared from Weinreb’s
amide 28 was then readily converted to desired enolsilane 6
(7 steps; 66% overall from catechol 24).
Having devised highly stereocontrolled routes to all three
key fragments, the union of enolsilane 6 and acetate 5 was
investigated (Scheme 5). Rigorous experimentation revealed
that BF3·OEt2 was the optimum Lewis acid and that TBS
enolsilane 6 performed better than the corresponding TMS
(21) Langer, P.; Schneider, T.; Stoll, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2000, 6, 3204.
(22) (a) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 7883. (b) Crimmins, M. T.; Chaudhary, K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
775. (c) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A.; Chaudhary, K. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 65, 894. (d) Crimmins, M. T.; Shamszad, M. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 149.
(23) Ayala, L.; Lucero, C. G.; Romero, J. A. C.; Tabacco, S. A.;
Woerpel, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15521.
(24) DIBAL in toluene at -78 °C was completely selective for the
undesired isomer.
(25) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1987.
For a review, see: Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S.; Chen, C. P.;
Singh, V. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7925.
(26) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Rogers, B.; Yang, G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
3511. Also see Supporting Information.
(27) Shioiri, T.; Yamada, S.; Ninomiya, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
94, 6203.
(18) (a) Kopecky, D. J.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
191. (b) Dahanukar, V. H.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
8317.
(28) (a) Shioiri, T.; Yamada, S. I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1974, 22, 855.
(b) Csuk, R.; Schabel, M. J.; von Scholz, Y. V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1996, 7, 3505. (c) Sibi, M. P.; Lu, J.; Edwards, J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
5864.
(19) Langer, P.; Kracke, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4545.
(20) (a) Node, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Ichihashi, S.; Nishide, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 6331. (b) Isobe, T.; Ishikawa, T. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
6984.
(29) Weinstock, J. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3511. Also see: Smith, A. B.,
III.; Safonov, I. G.; Corbett, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11102
.
3992
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 17, 2009