Organic Process Research & Development 2007, 11, 689−692
A Short and Efficient Synthesis of (R,R)-2-Methylcyclopropanecarboxylic Acid
Laurent Delhaye,† Alain Merschaert,*,†,§ Pieter Delbeke,‡ and Willy Brioˆne‡
Chemical Product Research and DeVelopment and Analytical Sciences Research and DeVelopment, Eli Lilly & Company,
Lilly DeVelopment Centre S.A., Rue Granbonpre 11, B-1348 Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium
Abstract:
We report herein a short and efficient synthesis of (R,R)-2-
methylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid via a Horner-Wadsworth-
Emmons reaction involving commercially available (S)-propy-
lene oxide and triethylphosphonoacetate (TEPA). The TEPA/
base/propylene oxide stoichiometry was found critical to achieve
high yields. We therefore studied the TEPA anion formation
and stability using in situ IR spectroscopy. The reaction yield
is strongly influenced by the counterion and solvent, whereas
high diastereoselectivities are always obtained. Under the best
experimental conditions (HexLi/MeTHF/150 °C), crude (R,R)-
2-methylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid is obtained in 85-90%
yield with >98% trans selectivity.
Figure 1.
Figure 2. Major impurities formed in the reaction of (S)-
propylene oxide with TEPA anions.
Introduction
It has been known for a long time that cyclopropane
derivatives can be prepared from epoxides via the Horner-
Wadsworth-Emmons (HWE) reaction.1 In recent years, this
method has successfully been extended to the preparation
of enantiomerically pure trans-2-aryl-cyclopropanecarboxylic
acid derivatives.2
Several methods have been reported to prepare chiral
nonracemic 2-methylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid.3 However,
to the best of our knowledge, all these methods have major
disadvantages with respect to the development of a large
scale process: multistep synthesis,3a,b,d,e moderate enantio-
meric excess,3a-c,g use of expensive chiral auxiliaries,3d,e,g and
consistently low overall yields.
Results and Discussion
In contrast to the reaction of styrene oxide or related aryl
epoxides with anions of triethylphosphonoacetate (TEPA),
the utilization of propylene oxide is much more challenging
from several points of view: (i) alkyl epoxides typically
afford only moderate yields of the corresponding cyclopro-
panes;4 (ii) the low boiling point of propylene oxide may
cause technical difficulties unless appropriate pressurized
equipment is used;5 (iii) a mixture of cis- and trans-
diastereomers is likely to be obtained due to the potentially
weaker steric repulsion between the methyl group and the
carbethoxy function.
From the first screening that was perfomed at a 1 mmol
scale we restricted the choice of bases to potassium, sodium
or lithium alkoxides, alkyl lithiums, and sodium hydride for
the subsequent work. Indeed, very low yields were observed
with weaker mineral (Cs2CO3, K2CO3, K3PO4, KOH) or
organic (LDA, DBU) bases. We also decided to focus on
ethereal solvents as low conversions were obtained in
hydrocarbons (toluene, xylenes).6
Herein, we wish to report the development of a short and
high-yielding synthesis of (R,R)-2-methylcyclopropanecar-
boxylic acid 2b from commercially available (S)-propylene
oxide 1 (Figure 1).
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alain.merschaert@
ucb-group.com.
† Chemical Product Research and Development.
‡ Analytical Sciences Research and Development.
§ Present affiliation and address: UCB Pharma S.A., Chemical Process
Development and Industrialisation, Chemin du Foriest, B-1420 Braine-l’Alleud,
Belgium.
During our initial studies, we also noticed the formation
of several major byproducts (Figure 2). Impurities 3 and 4
are derived from either a competitive protonation of the
alkoxide 6 or carbanion 8 intermediates illustrated in the
mechanism proposed below (Figure 3).2b,3f Impurity 5 results
(1) (a) Wadsworth, W. S., Jr.; Emmons, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83,
1733. (b) Denney, D. B.; Vill, J. J.; Boskin, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962,
84, 3944.
(2) (a) Armstrong, A.; Scutt, J. N. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2331. (b) Armstrong, A.;
Scutt, J. N. Chem. Commun. 2004, 510. (c) Singh, A. K.; Rao, M. N.;
Simpson, J. H.; Li, W.-S.; Thornton, J. E.; Kuehner, D. E.; Kacsur, D. J.
Org. Process Res. DeV. 2002, 6, 618.
(3) (a) Sakaguchi, K.; Mano, H.; Ohfune, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4311.
(b) Arai, I.; Mori, A.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 8254.
(c) Wang, M.-X.; Feng, G.-Q. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2002, 18, 267. (d)
Vallgarda, J.; Hacksell, U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5625. (e) Vallgarda,
J.; Appelberg, U.; Csoeregh, I.; Hacksell, U. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1994, 461. (f) Walser, P.; Renold, P.; N’Goka, V.; Hosseinzadeh, F.;
Tamm, C. HelV. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 1941. (g) Ebers, R.; Kellogg, R. M.
Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1990, 109, 552.
(4) (a) See ref 1. (b) Deno, N. C.; Billups, W. E.; LaVietes, D.; Scholl, P. C.;
Schneider, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 3700.
(5) Under our optimal conditions (HexLi/MeTHF/150 °C), a pressure of 10
bar is obtained with a reactor filled at one-third of its volume. The use of
t-BuONa at 110 °C allows lowering the pressure at 4 to 5 bar.
(6) Low conversions in hydrocarbons were attributed to the formation of very
thick slurries resulting in bad mixing.
10.1021/op060249m CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/13/2007
Vol. 11, No. 4, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
689