4936
B. Zhu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4933–4936
Table 2
amide was converted to the methyl ketone by treatment with
In vivo efficacy of 1e in the S. aureus murine lethal systemic infection model
CH3MgBr. The resulting ketone 16 was subjected to a reductive
amination reaction with glycine methyl ester (R2 = H) or
L-alanine
Compd
ED50 (mg/kg)
methyl ester [R2 = (S)-CH3] in the presence of NaCNBH3 to give
compound 18 as a mixture of two diastereomers. Removal of the
Boc group using trifluoroacetic acid, followed by cyclization under
basic conditions (aq NaHCO3, THF) afforded the cyclized amide 19.
The amide group was reduced to a tertiary amine by treatment
with LiAlH4. Protecting the secondary amine with a Boc group gave
a mixture of two diastereomers 20 and 21, which could be easily
separated by standard chromatography. The TBS protecting group
of 20 and 21 was removed by treatment with aq HF in CH3CN,
and the resulting hydroxyl was oxidized to the corresponding ke-
tones 22 and 23, respectively.
Compounds 22 and 23 were first converted to boronic esters 3b
and 3c, which were then coupled with the quinolone derivative 2.
The final products 1k–q and 1r–u were obtained after oxidation,
hydrolysis and de-protection under the same conditions as those
described in Scheme 3.
Oral
Subcutaneous
Cipro
1e
10.8
4.0
1.4
<1.25
Compound 1e was selected for further evaluation in a murine
lethal systemic infection model ( S. aureus subsp. aureus
ATCC13709),11 and exhibited more potent in vivo efficacy (oral
ED50 = 4.0 mg/kg; subcutaneous ED50 <1.25 mg/kg) than ciproflox-
acin (Table 2).
In summary, we have designed and synthesized a series of novel
7-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazin-7-yl) quinolones with a
carbon–carbon linkage between the quinolone nucleus and the C7
side chain. The antibacterial activity of these compounds was eval-
uated against ciprofloxacin-susceptible and ciprofloxacin-resistant
bacteria. One of the best analogs of this series (compound 1e) also
demonstrated good in vivo efficacy. Further studies of the antibac-
terial activity of this series of quinolone compounds will be re-
ported in the future.
The in vitro antibacterial activity of the 7-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazin-7-yl) quinolones 1 was determined against
both ciprofloxacin-susceptible and ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria.
Data for representative compounds, along with ciprofloxacin, are
presented in Table 1 as the minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC; lowest concentration of compound inhibiting visible
growth)10 against an abbreviated panel of six bacterial strains,
including ciprofloxacin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus subsp.
aureus ATCC13709 (A), S. pneumoniae ATCC49619 (B), and Esche-
richia coli ATCC25922 (F), as well as ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical
isolates of S. pneumoniae OC5462 (C), OC5458 (D) and OC5465 (E).
Compared to ciprofloxacin, the 7-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrol-
o[1,2-a]pyrazin-7-yl) quinolones listed in Table 1 showed similar
in vitro activity against the ciprofloxacin-susceptible Gram-posi-
tive bacteria, S. aureus subsp. aureus ATCC13709 (A) and S. pneumo-
niae ATCC49619 (B), whereas they were generally less active
against the ciprofloxacin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria,
E. coli ATCC25922 (F). In contrast, the majority of the 7-(1,2,3,4-tet-
rahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazin-7-yl) quinolones exhibited lower
MIC values against all or some of the three ciprofloxacin-resistant
S. pneumoniae strains C, D and E than ciprofloxacin. The data indi-
cated that substituents at the 1- and 8-positions of the quinolone
core as well as the C7 side chain all played crucial roles in deter-
mining the antibacterial activity of the corresponding quinolone
compounds. Among various 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyra-
zine side chains investigated, the combination of a C-8 methoxy
group (X = C-OCH3) and a N-1 cyclopropyl group (R1 = cyclopropyl)
generally led to analogs with better antibacterial activity, as dem-
onstrated by compounds 1b, 1e, and 1m. For methyl substituted
1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine side chains, the position
of the methyl group on the tetrahydropyrazine ring was important
(1d–1i vs 1k, 1m–1q), as well as the stereochemistry (1e vs 1j; 1m
vs 1s). The (S)-configuration of the methyl group seemed to be pre-
ferred. Accordingly, incorporation of a second methyl group of the
(R)-configuration into the tetrahydropyrazine ring did not improve
antibacterial activity (1u vs 1e). The unsubstituted 1,2,3,4,-tetrahy-
dropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine (1a–1c) and the (S)-methyl substituted
1,2,3,4,-tetrahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine (1d–1i) side chains are
apparently optimal for this series. In fact, among the 7-(1,2,3,4,-
tetrahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazin-7-yl) quinolones evaluated, 1b
and 1e are the most potent compounds in terms of in vitro antibac-
terial activity against ciprofloxacin-susceptible and ciprofloxacin-
resistant strains.
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to thank Ellyn Wira for contributions to
in vitro testing.
References and notes
1. Lesher, G. Y.; Froelich, E. J.; Gruett, M. D.; Bailey, J. H.; Brundage, R. P. J. Med.
Chem. 1962, 5, 1063.
2. For some recent reviews, see: (a) Ball, P. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 46, 17;
(b) Appelbaum, P. C.; Hunter, P. A. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2000, 16, 5; (c)
Andriole, V. T. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, S113; (d) Bambeke, F. V.; Michot, J. M.;
Eldere, J. V.; Tulkens, P. M. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 256; (e) Mitscher, L.
A. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 559.
3. (a) Wise, R.; Andrews, J. M.; Edwards, L. J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983,
23, 559; (b) Grobe, K.; Heitzer, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1987, 29.
4. (a) Atarashi, S.; Yokohama, S.; Yamamzaki, K.; Sakano, K.; Imamura, M.;
Hayakawa, I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1987, 35, 1896; (b) Une, T.; Fujimoto, T.; Sato,
K.; Osada, Y. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1988, 32, 559.
5. For selected examples, see: (a) Carabateas, P. M.; Brundage, R. P.; Gelotte, K. O.;
Gruett, M. D.; Lorenz, R. R.; Opalka, C. J.; Singh, B.; Thielking, W. H.; Williams, G.
L.; Lesher, G. Y. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1984, 21, 1857; (b) Reuman, M.; Daum, S. J.;
Singh, B.; Wentland, M. P.; Perni, R. B.; Pennock, P.; Carabateas, P. M.; Gruett, M.
D.; Saindane, M. T.; Dorff, P. H.; Coughlin, S. A.; Sedlock, D. M.; Rake, J. B.;
Lesher, G. Y. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2531; (c) Todo, Y.; Takagi, H.; Iino, F.;
Fukuoka, Y.; Takahata, M.; Okamoto, S.; Saikawa, I.; Narita, H. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1994, 42, 2569; (d) Laborde, E.; Kiely, J. S.; Culberton, T. P.; Lesheski, L. E. J.
Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1964.
6. (a) Takahata, M.; Mitsuyama, J.; Yamashiro, Y.; Yonezawa, M.; Araki, H.; Todo,
Y.; Minami, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Narita, H. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43,
1077; (b) Hayashi, K.; Takahata, M.; Kawamura, Y.; Todo, Y. Arzneimittel-
Forschung 2002, 52, 903.
7. Pfitzner, K. E.; Moffatt, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5661.
8. Takagi, J.; Takahashi, K.; Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
8001.
9. For preparation of 7-OTf intermediate, see: Kiely, J. S.; Laborde, E.; Lesheski, L.
E.; Bucsh, R. A. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1991, 28, 1581.
10. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the broth
microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
(CLSI, formerly NCCLS) guidelines. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial
Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 5th ed.; Approved
standard: NCCLS Document M7-A5, 2000.
11. The in vivo efficacies of compound 1e and ciprofloxacin were tested in female
Swiss-Webster mice infected ip with Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus
ATCC13709. Mice were dosed subcutaneously and orally with test compound
at 1 h following infection. Mortality was observed over a period of three days. A
group of infected mice not treated with drug served as controls.